<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Phishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/phishing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Phishing Scam Poses as Message from Mark &#8216;Zurckerberg&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-phishing-scam-poses-as-message-from-mark-zurckerberg-2013-03</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-phishing-scam-poses-as-message-from-mark-zurckerberg-2013-03#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Wolford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook hoax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoaxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=219738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook CEO Mark Zurckerberg is not sending out privacy notices, requesting that users verify their accounts. That&#8217;s because no such messages would ever come from the Facebook CEO. There&#8217;s also that pesky little detail that the CEO of Facebook is &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook CEO Mark Zurckerberg is not sending out privacy notices, requesting that users verify their accounts. That&#8217;s because no such messages would ever come from the Facebook CEO. There&#8217;s also that pesky little detail that the CEO of Facebook is not Mark Zurckerberg.</p>
<p>This one should immediately throw up some red flags, considering that the scammers can&#8217;t even spell &#8220;Zuckerberg&#8221; correctly. A new phishing scam making its way around Facebook is just a new riff on a classic ruse. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.hoax-slayer.com/facebook-page-phishing-scam.shtml">Hoax Slayer is reporting</a> a message hitting some users&#8217; inboxes claims to be from &#8220;Mark Zurckerberg&#8221; and states that&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Mark Zurckerberg</p>
<p>Dear Facebook user, After reviewing your page activity, it was determined that you were in violation of our Terms of service.Your account might be permanently suspended.</p>
<p>If you think this is a mistake,please verify your account on the link below.This would indicate that your Page does not have a violation on our Terms of Service.</p>
<p>We will immediately review your account activity,and we will notify you again via email.<br />
Verify your account at the link below: </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Clicking on the link will direct users to a fake Facebook login page. Although made to look like the real Facebook login page, this malicious site will simply steal your info once you enter it in. </p>
<p>This type account verification scam is old, but persistent. Most claim that the user has violated some Facebook terms and must verify their account in order to keep it from being suspended. In the past couple of months, we&#8217;ve seen a couple variations of this scam hit Facebook. One version <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-scammers-pose-as-security-team-to-phish-your-info-2013-01">purported to come from the Facebook Security Team</a>. Another scam message claimed that users had been &#8220;annoying or insulting&#8221; to other users and that they face account suspension. Both of those scams, like this &#8220;Zurckerberg&#8221; one, asked for personal info to &#8220;verify&#8221; the accounts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-phishing-scam-poses-as-message-from-mark-zurckerberg-2013-03/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Goes DMARC To Fight Phishing</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/twitter-goes-dmarc-to-fight-phishing-2013-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/twitter-goes-dmarc-to-fight-phishing-2013-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dMarc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=218106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over a year ago, fifteen major companies joined forces to create DMARC, a &#8220;technical working group&#8221; to develop antiphishing standards. The companies were: Google, Facebook, LinkedIn AOL, Microsoft, Yahoo, PayPal (eBay), Bank of America, Fidelity Investments, American Greetings, Agari, Cloudmark, &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over a year ago, fifteen major companies <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/dmarc-major-web-players-join-forces-on-antiphishing-standards-2012-01">joined forces</a> to create <a href="http://www.dmarc.org/">DMARC</a>, a &#8220;technical working group&#8221; to develop antiphishing standards. The companies were: Google, Facebook, LinkedIn AOL, Microsoft, Yahoo, PayPal (eBay), Bank of America, Fidelity Investments, American Greetings, Agari, Cloudmark, eCert, Return Path and Trusted Domain Project.</p>
<p>Today, Twitter announced that it is using the DMARC technology with its emails, making it less likely that users will see any email pretneding to be from a Twitter.com address. </p>
<p>&#8220;We send out lots of emails every day to our users letting them know what’s happening on Twitter. But there’s no shortage of bad actors sending emails that appear to come from a Twitter.com address in order to trick you into giving away key details about your Twitter account, or other personal information, commonly called &#8216;phishing&#8217;,&#8221; <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2013/02/introducing-dmarc-for-twittercom-emails.html">said</a> Twitter Postmaster Josh Aberant. </p>
<p>&#8220;Without getting too technical, DMARC solves a couple of long-standing operational, deployment, and reporting issues related to email authentication protocols,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It builds on established authentication protocols (DKIM and SPF) to give email providers a way to block email from forged domains popping up in inboxes. And that in turn lessens the risk users face of mistakenly giving away personal information.&#8221;</p>
<p>Twitter began using DMARC earlier this month. AOL, Gmail, Hotmail/Outlook and Yahoo Mail all take advantage of the technology. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/twitter-goes-dmarc-to-fight-phishing-2013-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Phishing Scam Claims You&#8217;ve Violated Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-phishing-scam-claims-youve-violated-policy-2013-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-phishing-scam-claims-youve-violated-policy-2013-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Wolford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scammers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=213007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another day, another Facebook-based phishing scam looking to snatch all of your personal information (including bank account info) and use it for nefarious purposes. The latest scam to hit the network comes in the form of messages sent to users&#8217; &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another day, another Facebook-based phishing scam looking to snatch all of your personal information (including bank account info) and use it for nefarious purposes. </p>
<p>The latest scam to hit the network comes in the form of messages sent to users&#8217; inboxes. These are not simply spam messages that will get caught up in that &#8220;other&#8221; inbox that Facebook reserves for non-important communications. These messages may come from compromised accounts, ones that could be given access to your inbox. </p>
<p>If you receive one of these scam messages, it&#8217;ll look like this:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>WARNING: Your account is reported to have violated the policies that are considered annoying or insulting Facebook users.system will disable your account within 24 hours if you do not do the reconfirmation. Please confirm your Facebook account below:</em></p></blockquote>
<p>If the ridiculous assertion that you&#8217;ve &#8220;annoyed users&#8221; doesn&#8217;t immediately throw you off, there&#8217;s a link. </p>
<p>Upon clicking, a page will prompt users to enter their Facebook account info and password. It then asks you to confirm which webmail service you use to sign-in to Facebook (getting more suspicious). Finally, it drops the big request &#8211; your credit card info. At this point, you should definitely realize you&#8217;ve been duped and stop entering information.</p>
<p>This scam is similar to another one we reported on earlier this month that also <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-scammers-pose-as-security-team-to-phish-your-info-2013-01">involved private messages from &#8220;The Facebook Security Team</a>.&#8221; Except we all know that the real Facebook Security team doesn&#8217;t send out messages to specific users asking them to verify account details. Both scams warn users that their accounts may be suspended for some sort of unspecified violation of the terms of service.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/phishing-scam-spreads-via-facebook-pm/">GFI</a> via <a href="http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/01/24/not-just-twitter-dms-scammers-now-phish-usernames-passwords-and-credit-cards-via-facebook-pms/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed:+TheNextWeb+(The+Next+Web+All+Stories)&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">The Next Web</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-phishing-scam-claims-youve-violated-policy-2013-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Scammers Pose as Security Team to Phish Your Info</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-scammers-pose-as-security-team-to-phish-your-info-2013-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-scammers-pose-as-security-team-to-phish-your-info-2013-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Wolford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scammers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=209809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook users should be cautious if confronted by a message from the &#8220;Security Team,&#8221; as they could be unwittingly giving up their private info to scammers. It&#8217;s the latest phishing attack on the network, which sees its fair share of &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook users should be cautious if confronted by a message from the &#8220;Security Team,&#8221; as they could be unwittingly giving up their private info to scammers. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the latest phishing attack on the network, which sees its fair share of such deceptions. Some users are currently receiving  messages from pages called Security Team, which ask users to verify their accounts via outside link or face an account suspension.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what the scam message looks like, <a href="http://facecrooks.com/Scam-Watch/Page-Security-Team-Phishing-Scam-Targeting-Facebook-Page-Admins.html">courtesy Facecrooks</a>:</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/phishfbscam567.jpg" class="aligncenter" width="616" height="354" /></p>
<p>As you can see, the scammers use the same logo that the real Facebook Security page uses, hoping that it will give the message more credibility with users. It&#8217;s also grammatically well constructed (for the most part), something we can&#8217;t say for most phishing scams that hit Facebook.   </p>
<p>But the link that it contains should tip you to its illegitimacy. It uses Facebook&#8217;s app&#8217;s domain to link users to a page asking for their page name, phone number, and password.</p>
<p>A quick search on Facebook yields dozens of pages for &#8220;Security Team,&#8221; all using the official Facebook Security logo and all created in the last couple of weeks.  These pages, as obvious scam attempts, should be removed fairly soon. But others will always pop up in their place. Always be vigilant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-scammers-pose-as-security-team-to-phish-your-info-2013-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Wants You To Help Identify Phishing Scams</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-wants-you-to-help-identify-phishing-scams-2012-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-wants-you-to-help-identify-phishing-scams-2012-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Wolford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=186200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who&#8217;s spent even a little bit of time on Facebook knows that users need to be vigilant. Phishing attacks, although relatively rare, do exist, and Facebook&#8217;s media-rich login based system is the perfect place for scammers to target potential &#8230;<br /><a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/136480/0/cc?z=1"><img src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/136480/0/vc?z=1&dim=105992&kw=&click=" width="615" height="80" border="0"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who&#8217;s spent even a little bit of time on Facebook knows that users need to be vigilant.  Phishing attacks, although relatively rare, do exist, and Facebook&#8217;s media-rich login based system is the perfect place for scammers to target potential victims.  </p>
<p>Today, Facebook has unveiled on new way for users to report phishing attempts across the network.</p>
<p>Now, if you come across any shady attempt to acquire your username, password, or other personal information, Facebook wants you to file a report.  You can do this by sending an email to the new address phish@fb.com.</p>
<p>&#8220;By providing Facebook with reports, we can investigate and request for browser blacklisting and site takedowns where appropriate. We will then work with our eCrime team to ensure we hold bad actors accountable. Additionally, in some cases, we&#8217;ll be able to identify victims, and secure their accounts,&#8221; <a href="https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-security/new-protections-for-phishing/10150960472905766">says Facebook</a>.  </p>
<p>Facebook reminds users that they should be wary of any email that asks for login or financial info.  One thing that users can do to protect themselves while investigating possible scams is to navigate to websites directly, instead of using the provided links within emails, chat messages, or posts.  </p>
<p>&#8220;This new reporting channel will compliment internal systems we have in place to detect phishing sites attempting to steal Facebook user login information.  The internal systems notify our team, so we can gather information on the attack, take the phishing sites offline, and notify users.  Affected users will be prompted to change their password and provided education to better protect themselves in the future,&#8221; they say.</p>
<p>In April, Facebook <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-launches-an-anti-virus-marketplace-2012-04">launched the Anti-Visus Marketplace</a> which allows users to download trial version of various popular anti-virus software.  At the time, they also incorporated those company&#8217;s databases into their own URL blacklist.  Last month, they unveiled the new Malware Checkpoint, which allows users to <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-launches-malware-checkpoint-so-users-can-be-proactive-in-their-own-protection-2012-07">be more proactive</a> in their own security.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-wants-you-to-help-identify-phishing-scams-2012-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Discusses Its Safe Browsing Record</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/google-discusses-its-safe-browsing-record-2012-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/google-discusses-its-safe-browsing-record-2012-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browsing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=172395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, this isn&#8217;t an advertisement for the benefits Google&#8217;s Chrome browser provides. Not even vicariously. Instead, the latest post over at the Google Security Blog is discussing the measures Google has taken to keep browsers safe through a number of &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, this isn&#8217;t an advertisement for the benefits Google&#8217;s Chrome browser provides. Not even vicariously. Instead, <a href="http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2012/06/safe-browsing-protecting-web-users-for.html" target="_blank">the latest post over at the Google Security Blog</a> is discussing the measures Google has taken to keep browsers safe through a number of anti-malware initiatives. While there&#8217;s still a ton to watch out in regards to phishing and various other forms of malware, but Google&#8217;s efforts to protect browsers, especially in regards to their search results, certainly helps.</p>
<p>Another thing that helps is the improved attention to detail from North American web users, which helps explain <a href="http://www.antiphishing.org/reports/apwg_trends_report_h2_2011.pdf" target="_blank">the rise of phishing attempts in Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia</a>. As for Google&#8217;s Safe Browsing effort, this month marks the five-year anniversary of the program, giving Google an opportunity to point out where they&#8217;ve been successful:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>
<ul>
<li><strong>We protect 600 million users through built-in protection for Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, where we show several million warnings every day to Internet users.</strong> You may have seen our telltale red warnings pop up — when you do, please don’t go to sites we&#8217;ve flagged for malware or phishing. Our free and public <a href="https://developers.google.com/safe-browsing/developers_guide_v2">Safe Browsing API</a>allows other organizations to keep their users safe by using the data we’ve compiled.</li>
<li><strong>We find about 9,500 new malicious websites every day.</strong> These are either innocent websites that have been compromised by malware authors, or others that are built specifically for malware distribution or phishing. While we flag many sites daily, we strive for high quality and have had only a handful of false positives.</li>
<li><strong>Approximately 12-14 million Google Search queries per day show our warning</strong> to caution users from going to sites that are currently compromised. Once a site has been cleaned up, the warning is lifted.</li>
<li><strong>We provide malware warnings for about 300 thousand downloads per day</strong> through our <a href="http://blog.chromium.org/2012/01/all-about-safe-browsing.html">download protection service</a> for Chrome.</li>
<li><strong>We send thousands of notifications daily to webmasters.</strong> Signing up with<a href="http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2009/10/show-me-malware.html">Webmaster Tools</a> helps us communicate directly with webmasters when we find something on their site, and our ongoing partnership with <a href="http://stopbadware.org/">StopBadware.org</a> helps webmasters who can&#8217;t sign up or need additional help.</li>
<li><strong>We also send thousands of notifications daily to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) &amp; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Emergency_Response_Team">CERTs</a></strong> to help them keep their networks clean. <a href="http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2011/10/safe-browsing-alerts-for-network.html">Network administrators can sign up</a>to receive frequent alerts.</li>
</ul>
<p></em></p></blockquote>
<p>Their report also points out the monthly discoveries of phishing sites and malware-infected sites, all of which are things to avoid.  If you haven&#8217;t been keeping up with how the war on malicious software and unscrupulous phishing attempts, you would be wise to increase your levels of vigilance:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/google_phishing_chart.jpg" alt="Phishing Chart" /></center><br />
As you can see, phishing attempts are very much alive and well.  The same is true for malware-infected sites and sites that try to infect your machine:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/google_malware_chart.jpg" alt="Malware-Infected Sites" /></p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/google_attack_sites_chart.jpg" alt="Attack Sites" /></center><br />
As you can see, the need for intelligent browsing coupled with a browser that has built-in anti-phishing/malware measures are pretty much a must in regards to browsing safety.  For those who surf on mobile browsers, <a href="http://static.usenix.org/event/upsec08/tech/full_papers/niu/niu.pdf" target="_blank">be mindful</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/google-discusses-its-safe-browsing-record-2012-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake Facebook Emails Claim You Have Missed Notifications</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/fake-facebook-emails-claim-you-have-missed-notifications-2012-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/fake-facebook-emails-claim-you-have-missed-notifications-2012-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Wolford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sophos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=169426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When browsing your inbox, be cautious around any email you receive claiming that you have Facebook notifications pending. That&#8217;s because a new email scam is on the loose and it&#8217;s targeting Facebook users. This new email scam comes packaged in &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When browsing your inbox, be cautious around any email you receive claiming that you have Facebook notifications pending.  That&#8217;s because a new email scam is on the loose and it&#8217;s targeting Facebook users.</p>
<p>This new email scam comes packaged in a highly convincing fashion and claims to come directly from Facebook.  The subject line will tell you that &#8220;you have notifications pending,&#8221; and the body will say &#8220;Hi, here&#8217;s some activity you have missed on Facebook.&#8221;  The email will also prompt recipients to click buttons to &#8220;Go To Facebook&#8221; and to &#8220;See All Notifications.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, the only words of advice here are to stay away from those links.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an actual, non-scammy notification email from Facebook:</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/fbrealemail90.jpg" class="aligncenter" width="616" height="305" /></p>
<p>And here&#8217;s the scam email.  You can see how people could be fooled &#8211; the scammers have done a remarkable job rendering a similar design to the message.  </p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/facebookfakeemail90.jpg" class="aligncenter" width="482" height="307" /></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/06/12/beware-fake-facebook-notifications/">Sophos&#8217; Naked Security blog</a>, the links took them to a Canadian pharmacy site that offered male enhancement drugs like Cialis and Viagra &#8211; typical.  &#8220;Chances are that the spammers are earning affiliate cash by driving traffic to the pharmaceutical website,&#8221; they said.</p>
<p>Of course, these types of links could take you on any number of malicious trips &#8211; a phishing site, a site containing malware, etc.  Just be on your toes, Facebook users.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/fake-facebook-emails-claim-you-have-missed-notifications-2012-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LinkedIn Password Leak Brings Email Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/linkedin-password-leak-brings-email-spam-2012-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/linkedin-password-leak-brings-email-spam-2012-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=167174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With more than 6.4 million LinkedIn passwords leaked onto a hash-cracking forum this week, there is no wonder that spammers will have a field day with the confusion it brought. Cameron Camp, a security researcher for the ESET cybersecurity software &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With more than 6.4 million <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/linkedin-passwords-leaked-online-2012-06">LinkedIn passwords leaked</a> onto a hash-cracking forum this week, there is no wonder that spammers will have a field day with the confusion it brought.  Cameron Camp, a security researcher for the ESET cybersecurity software company, <a href="http://blog.eset.com/2012/06/06/linkedin-security-woes-and-what-to-do-about-it">announced</a> that ESET had been notified by &#8220;several&#8221; people that they had received spam emails purporting to be from LinkedIn.  The emails asked users to confirm their email address with LinkedIn, and provided a link to do so.  Camp reports that the link actually sent users to an online pharmacy.  This spam email resembles others such as the <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-phishing-attacks-could-dupe-the-unwary-2012-04">Google+ spam email</a> that was identified earlier this year.</p>
<p>LinkedIn yesterday <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/linkedin-password-leak-confirmed-and-remedied-2012-06">responded</a> to the password leak within a few hours, announcing on its blog that affected accounts had been disabled and that members would be receiving instructions on how to reset their password.  One point Vicente Silveira, director at LinkedIn, made clear in his blog post announcing the company&#8217;s response was that the emails sent out would not contain any links to reset passwords.  From the post:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8230;members will also receive an email from LinkedIn with instructions on how to reset their passwords. There will not be any links in this email. Once you follow this step and request password assistance, then you will receive an email from LinkedIn with a password reset link.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This mirrors <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/linkedin-provides-password-protection-tips-2012-06">password advice</a> Silveira gave in an earlier blog post yesterday where he stated that users should never change their password by following a link in an email they did not request.  As Camp pointed out, these types of email spam are common, and these particular emails might not be related to the recent password leak.  Still, users should be careful of these types of spam and other, more malicious phishing attacks which redirect users to websites spoofed to look exactly the same as the login page for a website they use.</p>
<p>(Screenshot courtesy <a href="http://blog.eset.com/2012/06/06/linkedin-security-woes-and-what-to-do-about-it">ESET</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/linkedin-password-leak-brings-email-spam-2012-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German Court Rules Phishing Victim at Fault</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/german-court-rules-phishing-victim-at-fault-2012-04</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/german-court-rules-phishing-victim-at-fault-2012-04#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Fossum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparda bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=145717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would appear that German courts have little rational tolerance for various sorts of internet idiocy as of late, recently ruling that Youtube is responsible for its users when they upload copyrighted songs &#8211; and now a German Federal court &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that German courts have little rational tolerance for various sorts of internet idiocy as of late, recently ruling that <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-loses-german-royalties-case-2012-04" target="_blank">Youtube is responsible for its users when they upload copyrighted songs</a> &#8211; and now a German Federal court in the town of Karlsruhe has <a href="http://www.thelocal.de/national/20120425-42161.html" target="_blank">just ruled</a> that a victim of a phishing scam is responsible &#8211; for being phished. </p>
<p>The latest case involves a retiree losing roughly $6,600 after giving up his bank information to a fake site that looked identical to the real site of his bank, which ended up illegally transferring the funds to Greece, who incidentally can use all the transfers it can get. Still, Germany&#8217;s highest civil court has decided that the retiree was the one who was negligent, as Sparda Bank had offered its clients multiple warnings regarding phishing. And, Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), logged 5,000 reports of phishing in 2010, a big jump from 2009. </p>
<p>Still, the retiree did sit down and take the time to enter 10 TAN codes (transaction numbers) into the fake site. Who does that? The elderly maybe &#8211; and it&#8217;s clear Germans might, as the TAN codes are commonly used in that country to verify accuracy of online transactions. The codes can then be printed out, texted or looked up on a smartphone. Sparda Bank&#8217;s defense also noted that being prompted to enter multiple TAN codes is a classic sign of phishing. </p>
<p>According to the Local, &#8220;The plaintiff argued that the bank had a duty to protect its customers from the abuse of these codes &#8211; But the federal court upheld previous judgements by the district and state courts, agreeing with the bank’s argument that the customer should bear responsibility for falling for the con.&#8221; So, the retiree is out almost 7 grand, and Youtube might also soon be looking at a much more substantial loss. </p>
<p>In related news, it has been reported that the <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/syrian-activists-targets-of-facebook-phishing-2012-04" target="_blank">Syrian Electronic Army has been trying to gain access to rebel accounts using phishing tactics</a>, though they likely shouldn&#8217;t be too worried, as Anonymous has been monitoring the goings on of that situation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/german-court-rules-phishing-victim-at-fault-2012-04/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Phishing Attacks Could Dupe the Unwary</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-phishing-attacks-could-dupe-the-unwary-2012-04</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-phishing-attacks-could-dupe-the-unwary-2012-04#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing scan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=138214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The security gurus over at Naked Security are warning gmail users about a phishing scam they have seen emailed around to gmail users recently. A phishing scam is one in which a user is tricked into entering account usernames, passwords, &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The security gurus over at Naked Security are <a href="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/04/10/google-phishing/">warning</a> gmail users about a phishing scam they have seen emailed around to gmail users recently.  A phishing scam is one in which a user is tricked into entering account usernames, passwords, or other personal information into fields on compromised websites designed to look official.  The usual format is something along the lines of a terse email, apparently from an official source such as Facebook, Microsoft, or Google, demanding a password change from a user and providing a link to do so.  The link will lead to a page designed to mimic an official login page, but which will steal the information entered into the login fields.  Less sophisticated phishing scams will simply implore the user to reply to the email with personal information.</p>
<p>The phishing email Naked Security is warning of appears as if it were sent from the &#8220;<a href="http://plus.google.com/106496588763497046416/" title="WPWidgets Google Plus Search Directory">Google+</a> team.&#8221;  The email supposedly confirms that the user&#8217;s recovery email address has been changed, and that if the user has not done this, they should follow a link that has the link-text of http://accounts.google.com and update their account.  The last paragraph of the email is in a larger font and reads &#8220;However, Failure to do so may result in account suspension permanently.&#8221; [sic]  That&#8217;s an odd statement, since the email also states at one point that if the user has, in fact, changed their recovery email address then they can disregard the email entirely.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s logical contradictions such as this, numerous grammar and punctuation errors, and the threat of &#8220;account suspension permanently&#8221; that gives away a phishing scam.  Also, for those who are <em>really</em> paying attention, Google uses https for all of its sites now.  Obviously, the link to the Google accounts page actually leads to a phishing site that will steal the user&#8217;s Google login credentials.  And with Google services so intimately linked, that means the phisher would have access to the user&#8217;s Gmail, Google docs, <a href="http://plus.google.com/106496588763497046416/" title="WPWidgets Google Plus Search Directory">Google+</a>, and YouTube accounts, among others.  An Android phone could also be compromised through Google Play.</p>
<p>It can be easy to fall for such a scam if users are in a hurry or aren&#8217;t paying attention.  And Google isn&#8217;t the only company being spoofed, as some <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/phishing-email-targets-apple-customers-2011-12">Apple</a> customers have found out.  Users who simply take some time and enter the URL for the websites they use manually should be safe.  Also, Google users can add some <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/google-launches-2-step-verification-for-google-apps-2010-09">extra protection</a> to their accounts by turning on 2-step verification, which requires a code messaged to a user&#8217;s phone before logging in on a new computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-phishing-attacks-could-dupe-the-unwary-2012-04/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
