That rapid growth, however, has some people worried. The company has been dogged by an array of controversies relating to its manipulation and censorship of search results, its access to users’ private data, and its willingness to provide search terms to government authorities. As recently as yesterday, one tech blog noted that Google’s censorship seems to be on the rise.

YaCy (pronounced “ya see”) hopes to change all that. The German-based company, which has the support of the Free Software Foundation of Europe, released version 1.0 of their peer-to-peer search client today. YaCy is not a search engine in the traditional sense. It has no true web portal like Google’s or Bing’s or Yahoo’s. Though there is a demo web portal available for testing, the developer is careful to stress that it is only a demonstration, and does not provide the full experience. Instead users download a free open-source client to their computers. These clients crawl the internet independently, as well as indexing sites visited by their users, and share the results with other peers on the network. The result is that YaCy has no centralized servers. This means that users’ search terms are not accessible to any government entity, and that search results cannot be censored.

According to the YaCy website, the network currently has 1.4 billion documents indexed and over 600 peers. Each new peer expands the network and improves the speed at which websites are indexed. In addition to avoiding centralized servers and the concerns about censorship and privacy that go with them, YaCy aims to provide better, more personally relevant results to its users.

A request for comment sent to Michael Christen, YaCy’s developer, has not yet received a response. A screen shot of a typical YaCy search results page can be seen below.

The general reaction on Twitter seems to be one of cautious optimism. Most laud the freedom from centralized “big brother” type access:

Others see YaCy as a major breakthrough in search technology.

While others are uncertain whether the concept of peer-to-peer search has traction, given that it requires users to put their own machines on the network.

And others worry about the user-friendliness of the software’s design.

What do you think? Is YaCy a credible rival to Google? Will you be installing it? Sound off in the comments.

Devin Leonard with Fortune reports that Lime Wire has attracted +1 Records with a campaign to promote the label’s band The Morning Benders, and sell its music through Lime Wire’s music download store, which was launched earlier this year. Independent label The Orchard has already been participating, also offering tracks in the Lime Wire Store.

But that’s only the beginning. Lime Wire is trying to get major labels on board (which will surely be no easy task for them since they have been practically bitter enemies) to launch a legitimate online music site that would serve as a giant search engine for music. Naturally MySpace Music comes to mind, and honestly makes Lime Wire’s plan seem not so far-fetched. Leonard writes:

Earlier this year, Universal was suing MySpace in federal court for copyright violations. Now the majors are joint venture partners in the social network’s new ad-supported free music service.

In the end, some would say, the future of Lime Wire and the big record labels, too, may boil down to this: Does the music industry want to embrace the future (or even the present) and work with its one-time adversaries like Lime Wire? Or would it rather go down fighting its last and most epic battle over copyright infringement in the digital age?

If you want to know my personal opinion, I think the recording industry will eventually cave and give in to more platforms for online music (even if not for Lime Wire in particular). I think we’re going to see more strides the way we’re seeing with video right now. They’re going to eventually realize that the piracy battle will never truly be won, and that they can make their money other ways by playing ball.