<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Nielsen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/nielsen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Report: American Viewing Behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-report-american-viewing-behavior-2012-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-report-american-viewing-behavior-2012-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video watching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=97314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest Nielsen cross-platform report shows that Americans are watching more than 33 hours of video per week. Over 90% of viewers are subscribing to pay services for their television content but even more interesting is that over 75% are &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/cross-platform-report-q3-2011.html">Nielsen</a> cross-platform report shows that Americans are watching more than 33 hours of video per week. Over 90% of viewers are subscribing to pay services for their television content but even more interesting is that over 75% are also paying for broadband service. In fact, pay television services and internet broadband subscriptions have risen over 5% in the last year.  </p>
<p>Actually this makes a lot of sense. As consumers choose to spend more time at home to save money, they need to be entertained. Over five million homes have broadband only connections meaning they aren&#8217;t paying for television programming. this is an increase of almost 23% since 2010. I think this also makes a lot of sense. Save some money, most content is available online somewhere. Sometimes you just have to wait a week or two to see your favorite show.  </p>
<p>So that&#8217;s what Nielsen had to report. The internet just seems to get more popular every year and consumers continue to spend more on home entertainment like satellite, broadband, and wi-fi despite less than ideal economic conditions. It&#8217;s no surprise. As fuel gets more expensive, why not pay to bring the entertainment to you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-report-american-viewing-behavior-2012-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft, Apple Are Most Visited Computer/Electronic Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/microsoft-most-visited-site-2012-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/microsoft-most-visited-site-2012-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Bowling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overstock.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=88499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just as how you go to the grocery store when you want to find food, a new Nielsen report shows that when the people want to find some information about electronics and computers, it comes as no surprise that they &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as how you go to the grocery store when you want to find food, a new Nielsen <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/consumer-electronics-websites-microsoft-is-most-visited-but-apple-has-longest-time-spent/">report</a> shows that when the people want to find some information about electronics and computers, it comes as no surprise that they turn to websites of companies that specialize in electronics and computers.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s website welcomed 93.8 million unique visitors from the U.S. in September 2011, more than any other computer and consumer electronics brand online during the month. Visitors spent an average of 42 minutes perusing the site. In comparison, Apple saw 68.7 million unique visitors but their they were more likely to spend more time on their site as the average visitor remained on their website for 62 minutes per visitor. &#8220;Adobe, Mozilla, and CNET rounded out the top five brands, with 24 to 28 million visitors going to their sites and spending 2 to 6 minutes each on average. CNET was the only news website among the top 5 in this category overall.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amazon had the third-highest amount of unique visitor traffic with 72 million unique visitors, each spending an average of 29 minutes on the site. Amazon was leaps and bounds the most visited mass merchandiser website, easily dwarfing the traffic for and time spent on rival sites like Walmart, Target, and Overstock.com. Consumer traffic at Walmart &#8220;followed as the second-ranked site, where 34.5 million visitors spent an average of 13 minutes per person on the site. Target, Shopathome.com, and Overstock.com rounded out the top five most visited mass merchandiser websites.&#8221;</p>
<p>One stand-out factoid about Amazon: 1 in 3 people in the United States visited the site in September 2011. </p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/pictures/microsoftmostvisited.jpg" title="The fourth coast" class="aligncenter" width="457" height="353" /></p>
<p>Demographically speaking, women were more likely to both categories of websites. 3 out of 4 Internet savvy women visited consumer electronics sites during September 2011, compared to 7 out of 10 men. &#8220;Women were also 7 percent more likely to visit mass merchandiser sites. Young people aged 18-34 were slightly more likely than the general population (4 percent more likely) to visit consumer electronics sites.&#8221; Additionally, those in the middle income bracket were also more likely to visit computer and consumer electronics websites (guess that makes sense that they&#8217;d visit it more than low income consumers, and those 1%ers probably just hire people to do their comparative shopping for them).</p>
<p>Nielsen suggests that interested readers<a href="http://www.webpronews.com/hidef-smartphones-2012-01"> take a look</a> at their State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report for additional insights about these consumer habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/microsoft-most-visited-site-2012-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hi-Def, Smartphones, et al Rule Our Lives!</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/hidef-smartphones-2012-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/hidef-smartphones-2012-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tuttle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=87535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lorraine Baines: Our first television set. Dad just picked it up today. Do you have a television? Marty McFly: Well, yeah! You know we have&#8230; two of them. Milton Baines: Wow! You must be rich! Stella Baines: Oh, honey, he&#8217;s &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Lorraine Baines</em>: Our first television set. Dad just picked it up today. Do you have a television?<br />
<em>Marty McFly</em>: Well, yeah! You know we have&#8230; two of them.<br />
<em>Milton Baines</em>: Wow! You must be rich!<br />
<em>Stella Baines</em>: Oh, honey, he&#8217;s teasing you. Nobody has two television sets.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">a new report released by the Nielsen people</a> (who peek in your windows to see what you watch on TV), almost one in three U.S. households that have a television actually owns &#8211; wait for it &#8211; FOUR or more!</p>
<p>I am guessing that one is an HDTV hanging in the living room that they are still making payments on. Another is in the parents&#8217; bedroom. One hooked to an older XBox in the kids&#8217; room. Another is a monster CRT in the garage that still works but is hooked to nothing because Dad hasn&#8217;t yet bought that converter box and rabbit ears but doesn&#8217;t want to trash it and God knows no one will buy that dinosaur on Craigslist.  /digression</p>
<p>290 million Americans owns at least one television. There are only 307 million people in the U.S., including babies and hobos. We are entertainment and information junkies.</p>
<p>And we don&#8217;t stop with TVs. We love smartphones, tablets, anything we can get our hands on.</p>
<p>211 million Americans are online (at home) and 116 million of us carry that web-access around with us mobile. And what do we do with all that access? I&#8217;m glad you asked.</p>
<p>In terms of smart phone use, it breaks down like this&#8230;</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/nielsen-smartphone.png" title="Smartphone Use" class="aligncenter" width="888" height="629" /></p>
<p>And, as far as the apps we use on our phones, here&#8217;s the skinny&#8230;</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/nielsen-apps.png" title="App Use" class="aligncenter" width="921" height="676" /></p>
<p>So, we got TV and we got Internet. And, we got them at the same time! Ain&#8217;t that just like a guy?</p>
<p>Nope, that&#8217;s just like a woman&#8230;</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/nielsen-simultaneous.png" title="Simultaneous Use" class="aligncenter" width="467" height="849" /></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t shoot the messenger. You know you do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/hidef-smartphones-2012-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lots More People Still Use Myspace Than Google+</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/lots-more-people-still-use-myspace-than-google-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/lots-more-people-still-use-myspace-than-google-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Bowling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vevo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=86126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what is probably a surprise to nobody who uses the Internet with any kind of regularity, Google was the most visited U.S. web brand in 2011. As reported by Nielsen earlier today, the search engine juggernaut maintained an average &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what is probably a surprise to nobody who uses the Internet with any kind of regularity, Google was the most visited U.S. web brand in 2011. As <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsens-tops-of-2011-digital/">reported by Nielsen earlier today</a>, the search engine juggernaut maintained an average of 153.4 million unique visitors per month in 2011 while Facebook, the second top-ranked web brand, attracted 137.6 million unique visitors each month.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/pictures/topwebbrands.jpg" title="GOOGLE SMASH!" class="aligncenter" width="597" height="634" /></p>
<p>If it&#8217;s any consolation to Facebook, they obliterated all other social networks and blogs this year. Blogger, Google&#8217;s blogging service, was a distant second to Facebook&#8217;s top-ranked social networking site with 45.7 unique visitors per month. Twitter trailed even further behind the two online services with 23.5 million unique visitors followed by another blogging service, WordPress.com, at 20.3 million unique visitors. One telling detail of this data about social networks is that Myspace.com &#8211; Myspace! &#8211; was the fifth top ranked social network/blog in 2011 with 17.9 million visitors &#8211; over twice as many unique visitors as Google+. Really, Google+, you couldn&#8217;t even keep up with Myspace? While Google may be the top web brand in the country this year, they&#8217;ve still got some distance to cover in the social networking arena. </p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s this report from CNET earlier today that<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-57349107-2/google-surpasses-62-million-users/"> says that Google+ surpassed 62 million users</a>. Something isn&#8217;t adding up. Granted, the CNET report says that a quarter of all Google+ users joined in December and the Nielsen data doesn&#8217;t include December, but that&#8217;s still a huge discrepancy in these numbers. Maybe Google&#8217;s fudging their numbers by synchronizing Google+ with Gmail accounts so that they can include Gmail users as Google+ stats. I mean, I technically am a Google+ user because I use Gmail but that doesn&#8217;t mean I actually use Google+ for anything. I don&#8217;t see how else these numbers can be so starkly different.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/pictures/topsocialnetworks.jpg" title="FACEBOOK CRUSH!" class="aligncenter" width="592" height="638" /></p>
<p>Google shouldn&#8217;t hold its gigantic G-shaped head too low, though, because they also dominated among online video providers this year. YouTube, Google&#8217;s video service, attracted 111.1 million unique visitors this past year. The closest any other video service came to that number was VEVO, who attracted 34.5 million viewers. One notable stat in this data set is that Netflix took the Elevator of Winning all the way down to the Basement of Losing because they eked into the last spot on this list with 7.4 million. They&#8217;re probably lucky they even showed up on this list after spending their totally fubar summer trying their very best not to admit to everyone, &#8220;Hey, look okay, we have no idea what we&#8217;re doing!&#8221; Given that the DVD and streaming service is now split and nobody really wants to pay twice as much for both services now, I bet Netflix doesn&#8217;t even show up on this list next year.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/pictures/topvideodistributors.jpg" title="YOUTUBEPACMAN" class="aligncenter" width="588" height="636" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably a moot question to ask at this point, but is anyone even surprised by these rankings? When was the last time anyone even logged into a Myspace account? Watch this space this time next year to find out what 2012 does to shake up the hierarchy of online media titans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/lots-more-people-still-use-myspace-than-google-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen And comScore Settle Patent Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-and-comscore-settle-patent-dispute-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-and-comscore-settle-patent-dispute-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=85495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In March, Nielsen sued comScore, accusing the firm of infringing upon 5 patents related to measuring and displaying online content. Here’s a look at that complaint, courtesy of PaidContent: Nielsen v. ComScore [Complaint] Shortly thereafter, comScore countersued Nielsen and its &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In March, Nielsen sued comScore, accusing the firm of infringing upon 5 patents related to measuring and displaying online content. </p>
<p>Here’s a look at that complaint, <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-nielsen-sues-comscore-in-the-battle-of-the-audience-measurement-firms/">courtesy</a> of PaidContent: </p>
<p><center><font size="1"><a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/74454382/Nielsen-v-ComScore-[Complaint]">Nielsen v. ComScore [Complaint]</a></font><br /><object id="_ds_74454382" name="_ds_74454382" width="616" height="550" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://viewer.docstoc.com/"><param name="FlashVars" value="doc_id=74454382&#038;mem_id=7281&#038;showrelated=1&#038;showotherdocs=1&#038;doc_type=pdf&#038;allowdownload=1" /><param name="movie" value="http://viewer.docstoc.com/"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /></object><br /><script type="text/javascript">var docstoc_docid="74454382";var docstoc_title="Nielsen v. ComScore [Complaint]";var docstoc_urltitle="Nielsen v. ComScore [Complaint]";</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://i.docstoccdn.com/js/check-flash.js"></script></center></p>
<p>Shortly thereafter, comScore countersued Nielsen and its Net Ratings division, claiming it was infringing upon <em>its</em> patents. </p>
<p>That whole mess is apparently over now (at least for the next few years), as the two measurement firms have settled. Nielsen and comScore put out a joint press release, which says the following: </p>
<p><em>Nielsen Holdings N.V. (NYSE: NLSN), a leading global provider of information and analytics around what consumers watch and buy, and comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR), a leader in measuring the digital world, today announced the companies have settled their patent disputes.</p>
<p>As part of this settlement both companies will enter into a cross-licensing agreement. Subject to retained rights by Nielsen, comScore will acquire ownership of the four Nielsen families of patents asserted in litigation, a portfolio with many U.S. and international patents. comScore also grants Nielsen worldwide licenses for the families of the four patents comScore asserted in litigation. Both parties agree not to bring any patent action against the other for the next three years. In addition, Nielsen has acquired approximately $19 million in comScore restricted common stock with neutral voting requirements, which Nielsen has agreed to hold for a period of one year minimum.<br />
“We are pleased with this resolution,” said Steve Hasker, President, Media Products and Advertiser Solutions, Nielsen. “This agreement is supportive of and complements the substantial investments Nielsen has made in its intellectual property over the years. It also creates an incentive for our companies to explore potential forms of collaboration to better serve our clients.”</p>
<p>“We are pleased to put this matter behind us and to bolster our patent portfolio, enabling the application of this intellectual property to many areas involving the Web, such as ad visibility and Web engagement measurements,” said Dr. Magid Abraham, President &#038; CEO, comScore. “We believe that the agreements we have reached signal a new phase of cooperation for our companies and enable us to better deliver the innovation and value the industry needs.”</p>
<p>This agreement settles both patent suits filed by the parties in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-and-comscore-settle-patent-dispute-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top TV Ads of 2011 According to Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/top-tv-ads-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/top-tv-ads-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=85329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen has released a few top ten lists for the top TV ads of the year. The top most-liked new ad was from Volkswagen, and its Passat ad featuring a little boy dressed as Darth Vader. Here’s a look at &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen has released a few top ten lists for the top TV ads of the year. </p>
<p>The top most-liked new ad was from Volkswagen, and its Passat ad featuring a little boy dressed as Darth Vader. </p>
<p><center><object width="616" height="343"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/R55e-uHQna0?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/R55e-uHQna0?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="616" height="343" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Here’s a look at the whole list: </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-advertising"><img alt="Nielsen top ads" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/ads-2011-1.jpg" title="Nielsen top ads" class="aligncenter" width="588" height="912" /></a>   </p>
<p>The top most-remembered branded integration with a drama/sitcom was Purell and The Big Bang Theory from October 27, where Sheldon uses hand sanitizer after he puts a live snake into a desk drawer. Here’s that top ten list: </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-advertising/"><img alt="top ads" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/ads-2011-2.jpg" title="top ads" class="aligncenter" width="581" height="1063" /></a>   </p>
<p>Finally, the top primetime program with product placement activity was American Idol, with 577 occurrences. </p>
<p><img alt="top ads" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/ads-2011-3.jpg" title="top ads" class="aligncenter" width="584" height="639" />   </p>
<p><strong>What was your favorite TV ad of the year? <u><a href="http://www.webpronews.com/top-tv-ads-2011-12#comments">Let us know in the comments</a></u>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/top-tv-ads-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Facebook Users Add And Delete Friends [Infographic]</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-add-friends-delete-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-add-friends-delete-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=84988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NM Incite, a Nielsen McKinsey company, has put out the following infographic looking at why Facebook users add and remove friends. The top reason for adding a friend, according to their survey of nearly 2,000 adults, is knowing them in &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NM Incite, a Nielsen McKinsey company, has put out the following infographic looking at why Facebook users add and remove friends. </p>
<p>The top reason for adding a friend, according to their survey of nearly 2,000 adults, is knowing them in real life. Makes sense. The other reasons are interesting: 60% for mutual friends, 11% for business networks, 8% for physical attractiveness, 7% for increasing friend count (lame), 7% for friending everyone (lame), 7% for quality of photo, and 4% for their number of friends. </p>
<p>The top reason for removal is offensive comments. This is followed by: don’t know well (41%), trying to sell me something (39%), depressing comments (23%), lacking interaction (20%), political comments (14%), breakup/divorce (11%), don’t like their friends (8%), update profile too often (6%), they add too many people (6%), they don’t update enough (3%).  </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/friends-frenemies-why-we-add-and-remove-facebook-friends"><img alt="facebook friends and deletions" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/adding-fb-friends.gif" title="Facebook friends and deletions" class="aligncenter" width="575" height="1173" /></a> </p>
<p><strong>What’s your top reason for adding a friend? Removing a friend? <u><a href="http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-add-friends-delete-2011-12#comments">Let us know in the comments</a></u>. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-add-friends-delete-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Study: Teen Mobile Data Usage Up Over 250%</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-study-teen-mobile-data-usage-up-over-250-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-study-teen-mobile-data-usage-up-over-250-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaylin Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=84627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen has released the results of a study into mobile phone usage by various age groups. While the study shows a rise in data usage across the board, the greatest increase was in the 13-17 age group. In the third &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen has released the results of a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/new-mobile-obsession-u-s-teens-triple-data-usage/">study</a> into mobile phone usage by various age groups. While the study shows a rise in data usage across the board, the greatest increase was in the 13-17 age group. In the third quarter of 2010, teens in this group used an average of 90 MB of data per month. In this year’s third quarter they used a whopping 320 MB of data, a rise of 256%. While the increase was most dramatic among teens, every age group showed an increase. The next greatest increase was 147% in the 18-24 age bracket. Only one group &#8211; the 45-54 age bracket &#8211; showed an increase of less than 100%.</p>
<p><img alt="Data usage across age groups" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/data_usage.png" title="Data usage across age groups" class="aligncenter" width="580" height="296" /></p>
<p>The use of text messaging is highest among teens &#8211; particularly female teens &#8211; as well. Teens sent an average of 3,417 SMS/MMS messages per month in the third quarter of this year, with girls sending an average of nearly 200 more messages than boys.</p>
<p><img alt="Messaging across age groups" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/messaging.png" title="Messaging across age groups" class="aligncenter" width="579" height="303" /></p>
<p>Interestingly, voice usage is actually down among teens, who say they find messaging faster, easier, and more fun that voice calling. The study shows they used an average of just over 100 fewer minutes this year than in the same period last year.</p>
<p>These results are part of Nielsen’s broader State of the Media: The Mobile Media Report Q3 2011 (<a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2011-Reports/state-of-mobile-Q3-2011.pdf">PDF</a>). Another <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-the-rise-of-smartphones-apps-and-the-mobile-web">part</a> of the study focused on smartphone ownership and app usage across various age groups. They found that the majority of people in the 18-24 (53%) and 24-34 (64%) age groups owned smartphones. Meanwhile 40% of the 13-17 age group owned smartphones, a number which surely contributed to the dramatic increase in data usage in the same age bracket. The study also found and that 62% of smartphone owners had downloaded apps within the past 30 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/nielsen-study-teen-mobile-data-usage-up-over-250-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Comes to Xbox</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-comes-to-xbox-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-comes-to-xbox-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=84386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YouTube formally announced its Xbox 360 app today. With the app, users can check out trending videos, browse categories, and of course search for videos. Here are some videos they shared to accompany the announcement: I think it goes without &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube formally announced its Xbox 360 app today. With the app, users can check out trending videos, browse categories, and of course search for videos. Here are some videos they shared to accompany the announcement: </p>
<p><center><object width="616" height="343"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2WH6j-_e45M?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2WH6j-_e45M?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="616" height="343" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center></p>
<p><center><object width="616" height="343"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/11zUN3NPrwE?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/11zUN3NPrwE?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="616" height="343" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center></p>
<p><center><object width="616" height="343"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GTv6tWI9gZQ?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GTv6tWI9gZQ?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="616" height="343" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>I think it goes without saying that having YouTube on Xbox is going to be pretty big for driving video views on the console. </p>
<p>Nielsen says streaming video on game consoles is up over last year. The firm just put out <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/video-streaming-on-game-consoles-on-the-rise/">results from an October survey</a> on the topic. Here&#8217;s a look at that: </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/video-streaming-on-game-consoles-on-the-rise/"><img alt="Videos on consoles" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/pictures/videos-consoles.jpg" title="Videos on consoles" class="aligncenter" width="567" height="509" /></a></p>
<p>“Streaming now represents a reported 14 percent of Xbox 360 time, 15 percent of PS3 time and 33 percent of Wii time. This growth is fueled by the availability of services like Netflix, Hulu, MLB Network and ESPN3,” it says. </p>
<p>How do you think the YouTube app will affect that on Xbox? </p>
<p>Here’s a particularly timely infographic about YouTube facts from social-media-training.co.uk: </p>
<div class='visually_embed' rel='infographic' /><img class='visually_embed_infographic' src='http://visually.visually.netdna-cdn.com/YouTubeFacts2011_4ee8889152efa_w616.jpg' rel='http://visually.visually.netdna-cdn.com/YouTubeFacts2011_4ee8889152efa.jpg' />
<div class='visually_embed_bar' ><span>by </span><a target='_blank'  href='http://www.thedesignoven.co.uk'>thedesignoven</a><span> via </span><a target='_blank' class='logo' href='http://visual.ly'><img border='0' alt='visually' src='http://visual.ly/embeder/logo.png'></a></div>
<p><a id='visually_embed_view_more' target='_blank' href='http://visual.ly/youtube-facts-2011'></a>
<link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='http://visual.ly/embeder/style.css' />	<script type='text/javascript' src='http://visual.ly/embeder/embed.js' > </script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-comes-to-xbox-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Most Popular Android Apps: Facebook Dominates Across Ages</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/the-most-popular-android-apps-facebook-dominates-across-ages-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/the-most-popular-android-apps-facebook-dominates-across-ages-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=83848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen has released the results of a survey looking at the most popular apps on Android. The survey is broken up into three age segments: 18-24, 25-34 and 35-44. It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that Facebook dominates. &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen has released the results of a survey looking at the most popular apps on Android. The survey is broken up into three age segments: 18-24, 25-34 and 35-44. </p>
<p>It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that Facebook dominates. And that’s across each age group surveyed. It&#8217;s certainly worth noting that Facebook is beating Google’s own products on its own operating system. </p>
<p>It beats out Google Search, Gmail, Google Maps and YouTube (and yes, Google+), according to Nielsen’s numbers, though it does fall behind Google’s Android Market. Here’s how things shook out: </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30327&#038;shareadraft=baba30327_4ee1215729884"><img alt="Top Android Apps" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/pictures/nielsen-android-apps.png" title="Top Android Apps" class="aligncenter" width="575" height="504" /></a>   </p>
<p>Facebook has obviously become a force to be reckoned with for any Internet company in terms of where users are spending their time online (including mobile). Facebook is also the <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/itunes-rewind-2011-apple-gives-us-their-best-music-movies-and-apps-of-the-year-2011-12">top free app of the year in Apple’s App Store</a>. </p>
<p>It really says something about Facebook’s power when it dominates Android use so much, even though Facebook’s Android app has been very buggy and often complained about. <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-android-2011-12">Facebook just finally released a new, better version of the app</a>. It also says something about the trend of how people are consuming information. </p>
<p>“Apart from gaming, the 35-44 segment demonstrates a greater inclination to shop using the Amazon AppStore: 24 percent of them used the app in the last 30 days, while only 14 percent of those 18-24 did the same,” <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30327&#038;shareadraft=baba30327_4ee1215729884">says Nielsen</a>. “Groupon appeals more to those 25-34, not even making the top 20 ranking for those 18-24. A similar trend was found on Google+: active reach was higher for those 25 and older when compared to the 18-24 demographic.”</p>
<p>Nielsen ranked the apps by active reach, using percentage of Android owners who used the app within the past 30 days. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/the-most-popular-android-apps-facebook-dominates-across-ages-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/41 queries in 0.025 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 706/798 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 04:18:39 -->
