<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Minimum Bid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/minimum-bid/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Webmasters Buzz About Google Bid Hike</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/webmasters-buzz-about-google-bid-hike-2008-03</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/webmasters-buzz-about-google-bid-hike-2008-03#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Bid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=44397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minimum bid increases that apparently started yesterday have site publishers absorbing the impact of a Google Slap.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minimum bid increases that apparently started yesterday have site publishers absorbing the impact of a Google Slap.<br />
<span id="more-44397"></span>
<p>
The battle between Google and webmasters, quality content versus what makes money fast, continues.</p>
<p>
<a href=http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/016471.html target="_blank">Search Engine Roundtable</a> picked up on discussions humming along at <a href=http://www.webmasterworld.com/google_adwords/3592741.htm target="_blank">WebmasterWorld</a> and <a href=http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=738352 target="_blank">DigitalPoint</a>. At both sites, webmasters believe they have been hit with a &#8220;Google Slap,&#8221; an increase in keyword bids stemming from Google&#8217;s believe a site violates its AdWords quality guidelines.</p>
<div style="font-size: 10px; float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; width: 209px; color: #999999"><a title="Webmasters Buzz About Google Bid Hike" target="_blank" href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=738352"><img title="DigitalPoint Logo" height="85" alt="DigitalPoint Logo" width="209" border="0" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/dps_logo.jpg" /></a> DigitalPoint Logo <br />(Photo Credit: DigitalPoint )</div>
<p>
&#8220;The reports all come from advertisers noticing a major change in their minimum bids as of yesterday, March 5, 2008,&#8221; Barry Schwartz wrote.</p>
<p>
Minimum bids for ad groups began hitting the $10 mark, to the chagrin of posters on those boards. Google&#8217;s action deemed their sites of Poor quality, meaning unless the pages/sites in question receive fixes that Google approves, those bids will stay high.</p>
<p>
&#8220;They are trying to milk out more money per click,&#8221; one DigitalPoint poster fumed. &#8220;Especially after that Comscore erroneous article put their stock in a tailspin a couple weeks ago.&#8221;</p>
<p>
The simplest answer could be the correct one: Google just got around to reviewing the sites in question, and penalized them as per AdWords terms of service. Commentary on the boards doesn&#8217;t suggest the sites being Google Slapped were of exceptional use to their visitors, high click-through rates or otherwise.</p>
<p>
If they were, I think we would see webmasters publishing links to the sites with the newly-administered $10 bids, and demanding someone point out what Google might dislike about those pages. That isn&#8217;t happening, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/webmasters-buzz-about-google-bid-hike-2008-03/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 195/206 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 19:10:13 -->
