<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Limits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/limits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Sending Limits Explored</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-sending-limits-explored-2008-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-sending-limits-explored-2008-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caverly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=43891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the interest of not being sensationalists, here's a disclaimer: we realize that most people will never engage in the behaviors outlined in this article.&#160; But when using Gmail, there are some things that businesspeople and a few other folks should look out for, and they're listed below.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interest of not being sensationalists, here&#8217;s a disclaimer: we realize that most people will never engage in the behaviors outlined in this article.&nbsp; But when using Gmail, there are some things that businesspeople and a few other folks should look out for, and they&#8217;re listed below.</p>
<p><span id="more-43891"></span><br />
<img border="0" align="left" title="Gmail" alt="Gmail" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/sm_body/gmail_logo.gif" /></p>
<p>Bad addresses might deserve to be atop the list.&nbsp; Perhaps somebody gave you a fake email address; perhaps a typo or inactive account just goofed things up.&nbsp; Regardless, <a href="http://www.labnol.org/internet/email/gmail-daily-limit-sending-bulk-email/2191/" title="&quot;Gmail Has a Daily Limit on Sending Email&quot;">Amit Agarwal</a> warns, &quot;[Y]our account will get disabled if the email message contains a large number of non-existent or broken addresses (&lt;25 ?) that bounce back on failed delivery.&quot;</p>
<p>Now, as you probably noticed, that bit of advice mentions 25 addresses for one email.&nbsp; It&#8217;s an easily foreseeable scenario.&nbsp; But we&#8217;re heading into less likely territory.</p>
<p>Agarwal also writes, &quot;If you access Gmail via POP or IMAP clients (like Microsoft Outlook), you can send an email message to a maximum of 100 people at a time.&nbsp; Cross the limit and your account will be disabled . . . &quot;&nbsp; And, &quot;If you access Gmail from the browser, you may not address an email message to more than 500 people at a time.&quot;</p>
<p>So extremely heavy users may want to take care.&nbsp; Here&#8217;s one more piece of advice for the average person, though: be careful about using a Gmail account as a spam dump, because it will get completely deactivated if you don&#8217;t visit at least once every nine months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-sending-limits-explored-2008-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 193/203 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-12 16:34:58 -->
