Not Everyone Wants To Be On The Internet

The Columbus Dispatch reported on the decision by Kent State to ban its athletes from the networking site.

Athletic director Laing Kennedy’s decision affects about 400 athletes at the school, who have until August 1st to remove their profiles or risk reprisals from the university. The reason for this? Protecting student identities and the university’s image.

Kennedy said in the report that students who list phone numbers and addresses have been contacted inappropriately, either by strangers or sports agents. That led to this passage in the report:

Does this mean Kent State will delete student-athletes from campus phone directories, which have been the way strangers and sports agents have found contact information about them in the past?

Banning Facebook entries does little to protect student-athlete identities, since they are going to be published by local, regional, and even national media based on their athletic performance. Usually with photos, sometimes in full color.

Why doesn’t Kent State go all the way in protecting its students and ban Facebook completely from campus? Doesn’t the talented scholarship student majoring in biotech deserve as much protection as the soccer midfielder?

Kent State’s position here looks more like a halfway measure that protects its image in the national limelight, and more importantly the multi-billion dollar athletics industry of which it is a part. The school is demonstrating exactly what it values with the decision – money.

—
Tag:

Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Yahoo! My Web | Furl

Bookmark WebProNews:

David Utter is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.