<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Googel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/googel/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Cuts Jobs, But Acquisitions Ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/google-cuts-jobs-but-acquisitions-ahead-2009-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/google-cuts-jobs-but-acquisitions-ahead-2009-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisitions ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Googel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=48228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google submitted a regulatory filing with the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/">Securities and Exchange Commission</a> last month that has just recently come to light. The reason for this delay is perhaps that it was filed via <b>paper-only. </b></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google submitted a regulatory filing with the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/">Securities and Exchange Commission</a> last month that has just recently come to light. The reason for this delay is perhaps that it was filed via <b>paper-only. </b></p>
<p><img align="right" src="http://www.webpronews.com/files/pictures/picture-6137.gif" alt="Frank Reed" title="Frank Reed" style="margin: 5px;" />As Frank Reed <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-sec-filing-fuels-speculation.html">notes</a>, &quot;This practice avoids the online aggregators of these public records from being able to post the filing through their normal channels. I suspect these folks will have it sooner than later but the intentionality of Google providing the filing this way is curious. Trying to fly under the radar? Who knows.&quot;</p>
<p> <b>So what does the filing contain? <br /> </b><br /> <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/07/details-about-googles-layoffs-actually-no-none/">Sources say</a> that Google reports that it has 24,400 employees, 4,300 of which are interns, temps, and contractors. This is far less than than Google co-founder Sergey Brin said a few months ago. The number then for these types of workers was more like 10,000. Though Brin did note that some job cuts were on the way in this area. </p>
<p> Google Spokeswoman Jane Penner says that the number doesn&#8217;t necessarily reflect the total number of people cut by Google. I guess that means that some of them just quit. </p>
<p> Either way, it hardly sounds like downsizing, as Google also says that it plans to continue spending money on research and development as well as <b>acquisitions</b> &quot;at a pace consistent with the past two years.&quot;</p>
<p> Hmm. I wonder what acquisitions are in store for this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/google-cuts-jobs-but-acquisitions-ahead-2009-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 196/209 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-12 14:27:29 -->
