<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; GoDaddy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/godaddy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy&#8217;s Super Bowl Commercials Rank Near The Bottom</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddys-super-bowl-commercials-rank-near-the-bottom-2012-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddys-super-bowl-commercials-rank-near-the-bottom-2012-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl Commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=95933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve covered the USAToday Super Bowl admeter at WebProNews, and now that the Super Bowl is over and all the commercials have been shown, you get to see it in action. While the admeter for Super Bowl 46 shows Doritos &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve covered the USAToday Super Bowl admeter <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/best-and-worst-super-bowl-ads-vote-on-facebook-2012-02">at WebProNews</a>, and now that the Super Bowl is over and all the commercials have been shown, you get to see it in action. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/superbowl46/admeter.htm">While the admeter for Super Bowl 46</a> shows Doritos and Bud Light performed well, the one-time king of salacious Super Bowl commercials may have seen their time come to an end.  That&#8217;s right, both of GoDaddy&#8217;s commercials for this year&#8217;s big game rank near (or at) the bottom according to viewers.</p>
<p>Apparently, the days of Candice Michelle wooing people with her &#8220;wardrobe malfuction&#8221; are over.  As you can see:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/godaddy_rankings.jpg" alt="GoDaddy Rankings" /></center><br />
Either GoDaddy needs to start fresh with new faces and a new approach, or they haven&#8217;t gotten over the anti-SOPA backlash from January.  Considering the fact that the commercials just weren&#8217;t that entertaining or titillating, I doubt SOPA had anything to do with the reception.  Here are the commercials in question, just in case they escaped your view last night.  First, the body painting:</p>
<p><center><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/phF1ibedivw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
<p>Their second goes by &#8220;The Cloud,&#8221; and, well, &#8220;underwhelming&#8221; is a good word:</p>
<p><center><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4y224-Wp-Yk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center><br />
There&#8217;s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S-Jm9IBWN0">an extended version</a> of the second commercial, just in case you want to see if it continues to underwhelm.  It&#8217;s a sad day when the &#8220;sex sells&#8221; motto is completely and utterly disproved. </p>
<p>Does GoDaddy&#8217;s failure with their latest round of Super Bowl commercials mean this is the end of trying to create sexual tension between viewers and Danica Patrick is at an end or is there still room for titillation, as long as the quality of the commercial lives up to the hype?  Or is this a simple case of GoDaddy backlash? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddys-super-bowl-commercials-rank-near-the-bottom-2012-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy Super Bowl Ad #2 With Danica Patrick And Pussycat Dolls &#8220;Leaked&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-super-bowl-ad-2-with-danica-patrick-and-pussycat-dolls-leaked-2012-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-super-bowl-ad-2-with-danica-patrick-and-pussycat-dolls-leaked-2012-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl Ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=92890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last weekend, the first of two GoDaddy Super Bowl ads was &#8220;leaked&#8221; (because I&#8217;m sure GoDaddy doesn&#8217;t want them to be seen yet). It involved Danica Patrick and Jillian Michaels painting a naked lady. Standard GoDaddy ad fare. This one &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last weekend, the first of two GoDaddy Super Bowl ads was &#8220;leaked&#8221; (because I&#8217;m sure GoDaddy doesn&#8217;t want them to be seen yet). It involved <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddys-2012-super-bowl-commercial-involves-body-paint-danica-patrick-jillian-michaels-2012-01">Danica Patrick and Jillian Michaels painting a naked lady</a>. </p>
<p>Standard GoDaddy ad fare. </p>
<p>This one also features Patrick, along with the Pussycat Dolls: </p>
<p><center><object width="616" height="343"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KbDSiPB9xrw?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KbDSiPB9xrw?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="616" height="343" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>I&#8217;m still waiting on one with GoDaddy girls <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-elephant-bob-parsons-2011-03">slaughtering an elephant</a>, but it doesn&#8217;t look like we&#8217;ll see that this Super Bowl. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-super-bowl-ad-2-with-danica-patrick-and-pussycat-dolls-leaked-2012-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy&#8217;s 2012 Super Bowl Commercial Involves Body Paint, Danica Patrick &amp; Jillian Michaels</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddys-2012-super-bowl-commercial-involves-body-paint-danica-patrick-jillian-michaels-2012-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddys-2012-super-bowl-commercial-involves-body-paint-danica-patrick-jillian-michaels-2012-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl Ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=91249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Super Bowl is getting closer, and of course that means there will be new GoDaddy ads on the way. There will reportedly be two of them this year. At least one of them is on YouTube, but it is &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Super Bowl is getting closer, and of course that means there will be new GoDaddy ads on the way. There will reportedly be two of them this year. </p>
<p>At least one of them is on YouTube, but it is still unlisted. It can be viewed, but only by those who have a link to it. Hat tip to Laura Stampler for <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/godaddy-defends-sexy-strategy-leaks-super-bowl-ad-of-danica-patrick-and-jillian-michaels-painting-naked-model-2012-1?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+businessinsider+%28Business+Insider%29">providing one</a>. </p>
<p>The ad is for .co domains. </p>
<p>Here it is: </p>
<p><center><iframe width="616" height="343" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4igYHZ-hmGo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
<p>The past year has been a rather controversial one the company &#8211; even more so than usual &#8211; thanks to the <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-elephant-bob-parsons-2011-03">killing of an elephant</a> and <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-black-out-2012-01">SOPA flip flopping</a>. </p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how the company&#8217;s reputation evolves throughout this year. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddys-2012-super-bowl-commercial-involves-body-paint-danica-patrick-jillian-michaels-2012-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA: GoDaddy Kind of Blacks Out</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-black-out-2012-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-black-out-2012-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Walton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=90327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GoDaddy used to be in support of SOPA, now they’re not. You wouldn’t think that if you went to their site today. GoDaddy, on and off again supporter of SOPA, joined the other sites participating in the blackout today. The &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoDaddy used to be in support of SOPA, now they’re not. You wouldn’t think that if you went to their site today.</p>
<p>GoDaddy, <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-experiences-massive-sopa-backlash-2011-12">on</a> and <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/abandon-godaddy-day-wasnt-a-smash-hit-2011-12">off</a> again supporter of SOPA, joined the other sites participating in the blackout today. The only issue is, where is it? </p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/godadguy.png" alt="godaddy" /></p>
<p>Can you see the blackout? I couldn’t see it at first. Then you can see at the very bottom left, in a cute little corner, a black box that says, “Go Daddy &#038; many other Internet leaders oppose SOPA &#038; PIPA. </p>
<p>Clicking on the link takes you to a <a href="http://support.godaddy.com/godaddy/go-daddy-many-other-internet-leaders-oppose-sopa-pipa/?ci=56582">support page</a> with a brief explanation of their opposition that apparently only started when everybody else complained about it. </p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) was with the U.S. House Judiciary Committee when an uproar erupted on the Internet. An overwhelming majority of the Internet community voiced strong opposition to SOPA legislation. Go Daddy joined to oppose SOPA.</p>
<p>On Jan. 16, U.S. Representative Eric Cantor (R-VA) stopped action on SOPA.</p>
<p>Companion legislation, known as PIPA, is still up for debate in the U.S. Senate. Go Daddy opposes current PIPA legislation, as do many other major technology companies and users</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you think Go Daddy has done enough to voice their opposition to SOPA? Or is it just the &#8220;me too&#8221; mentality to avoid <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/moveyourdomain-day-could-be-another-blow-for-godaddy-2011-12">losing</a> more domains? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-black-out-2012-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Wikipedia Leaving GoDaddy Or Not?</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/is-wikipedia-leaving-godaddy-or-not-2012-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/is-wikipedia-leaving-godaddy-or-not-2012-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ByeDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=88460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did GoDaddy&#8217;s denouncement of SOPA/PIPA change the online encyclopedia&#8217;s point of view on the domain registrar or are the folks who run Wikipedia being selective about the next place they register their domain? As of now, thanks to the ByeDaddy &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did GoDaddy&#8217;s denouncement of SOPA/PIPA change the online encyclopedia&#8217;s point of view on the domain registrar or are the folks who run Wikipedia being selective about the next place they register their domain?</p>
<p>As of now, thanks to the ByeDaddy search engine, a list of the top 100 searched domains still with GoDaddy reveals Wikipedia.org in the top spot, as well as a host &#8212; pun intended &#8212; of other sites you wouldn&#8217;t expect to frequent a SOPA-supporting company with such direct ties to the Internet.  Sites like XKCD.com, UrbanDictionary, WordPress, Penny Arcade, TV Tropes, and Groveshark are just a few of the companies paying GoDaddy for their registrar service.</p>
<p>Perhaps the thinking is <a href="http://www.thoughtftw.org/2011/12/26/sopa-information-godaddy-is-immune/">GoDaddy&#8217;s immunity from SOPA-related shutdowns</a> will trickle down to domains that registered with GoDaddy.  As for Wikipedia, apparently, they still plan on leaving GoDaddy, but they are taking their time in regards to picking a new domain registration service.  A tweet from Jimmy Wales reveals as much:</p>
<style type="text/css">.ditto156083826878193664{background: #C0DEED url(http://a0.twimg.com/images/themes/theme1/bg.png) no-repeat;padding: 20px;} .ditto156083826878193664 a { color: #0084B4;} p.dittoTweet{background: #fff;padding: 10px 12px 10px 50px;margin: 0;min-height: 48px;color: #000;font-size: 18px !important;line-height: 22px;-moz-border-radius: 5px;-webkit-border-radius: 5px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata {display: block;width: 100%;clear: both;margin-top: 8px;padding-top: 12px;height: 65px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata span.author {line-height: 22px;color: #666;font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;} .mainlink {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 26px;color: #1F98C7;text-decoration: none;} .mainlink: hover {color: #1F98C7;text-decoration: underline;} .tweet {font-size: 24px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata span.author img {float: left; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px;} p.dittoTweet a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} p.dittoTweet span.timestamp {font-size: 12px;display: block;color: #999;} p.dittoTweet span.timestamp a {color: #999;text-decoration: none;}</style>
<div class="ditto156083826878193664">
<p class="dittoTweet"><span class="metadata"><span class="author"><a href="http://twitter.com/jimmy_wales"><img src="http://a1.twimg.com/profile_images/15944612/small_sepia_jimbo_normal.jpg"/></a><strong><a href="http://twitter.com/jimmy_wales" class="mainlink">@jimmy_wales</a></strong><br />Jimmy Wales</span></span><a href="http://twitter.com/jsweder">@jsweder</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/GoDaddy">@GoDaddy</a> We are moving.  They will not get another penny.  We are being thoughtful about choosing.<span class="timestamp"><a href="http://www.twitter.com"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/socialditto/twitter-bird.png" border="0" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/jimmy_wales/status/156083826878193664" title="Sun Jan 08 18:44:18 +0000 2012">2 days ago</a>  via web&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;powered by <a href="http://www.socialditto.com">@socialditto</a></span></p>
</div>
<p>Apparently, Namecheap&#8217;s promotional move didn&#8217;t appeal to the Wikipedia masters very much at all.  With that in mind, here&#8217;s the top 100 sites still with GoDaddy&#8217;s service, <a href="http://byedaddy.org/#top100">courtesy of the ByeDaddy&#8217;s metrics</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>wikipedia.org<br />
xkcd.com<br />
myeg.net<br />
quantic-destiny.com<br />
ronpaul2012.com<br />
digg.com<br />
mmo-champion.com<br />
cynicalbrit.com<br />
stackoverflow.com<br />
urbandictionary.com<br />
github.com<br />
wordpress.org<br />
wordpress.com<br />
sc2ranks.com<br />
rootzwiki.com<br />
wikipedia.com<br />
twit.tv<br />
respawn.com<br />
oceanmarketinginc.com<br />
tvtropes.org<br />
penny-arcade.com<br />
icanhascheezburger.com<br />
revision3.com<br />
nasl.tv<br />
theverge.com<br />
youjizz.com<br />
wellplayed.org<br />
solomid.net<br />
curse.com<br />
geekosystem.com<br />
hfboards.com<br />
worldofwarcraft.com<br />
mashable.com<br />
37signals.com<br />
giantbomb.com<br />
gravatar.org<br />
neogaf.com<br />
blip.tv<br />
swtor.com<br />
craveonline.com<br />
kevinrose.com<br />
xkcd.org<br />
grooveshark.com<br />
wikibooks.org<br />
wikia.com<br />
mspaintadventures.com<br />
foursquare.com<br />
destructoid.com<br />
barackobama.com<br />
memebase.com<br />
buzzfeed.com<br />
wikimedia.org<br />
explosm.net<br />
cheezburger.com<br />
wowhead.com<br />
stackexchange.com<br />
thenoisecast.com<br />
ronpaulforums.com<br />
openbsd.org<br />
livejournal.com<br />
katterhenry.net<br />
arenajunkies.com<br />
wocserver.org<br />
teevox.com<br />
nexon.net<br />
kde.org<br />
esfiworld.com<br />
airbnb.com<br />
yogscast.com<br />
oink.com<br />
soundcloud.com<br />
quickmeme.com<br />
kpopchan.com<br />
icefilms.info<br />
firedoglake.com<br />
fanfiction.net<br />
failblog.com<br />
colonyofgamers.com<br />
codsm.org<br />
codinghorror.com<br />
wimp.com<br />
shoemoney.com<br />
serverfault.com<br />
riaa.org<br />
nicholasforneris.com<br />
miniclip.com<br />
lockergnome.com<br />
lazygamer.net<br />
jrmracing.com<br />
feld.com<br />
break.com<br />
starcraft2.com<br />
pof.com<br />
lesther.info<br />
interviewstreet.com<br />
endoftheinter.net<br />
boardgamegeek.com<br />
blazemore.net<br />
archlinuxarm.org<br />
wingsupply.com</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Did <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-experiences-massive-sopa-backlash-2011-12">GoDaddy&#8217;s SOPA reversal</a> change minds of these site owners or are they simply taking their time, like Wikipedia?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nataliedee.com/020604/moving.jpg">Lead image courtesy of Natalie Dee</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/is-wikipedia-leaving-godaddy-or-not-2012-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data: People Don&#8217;t Actually Care That GoDaddy Supports SOPA</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/people-dont-really-caregodaddy-supports-sopa-2012-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/people-dont-really-caregodaddy-supports-sopa-2012-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Bowling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=87437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As if the news that the failure of MoveYourDomain Day wasn&#8217;t discouraging enough, here&#8217;s more terribleness: GoDaddy actually gained market shares last month while all the bad anti-SOPA sentiment was swarming them. According to WebHostingInfo, GoDaddy did see a very &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if the news that <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/abandon-godaddy-day-wasnt-a-smash-hit-2011-12">the failure of MoveYourDomain Day</a> wasn&#8217;t discouraging enough, here&#8217;s more terribleness: GoDaddy actually gained market shares last month while all the bad anti-SOPA sentiment was swarming them.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.webhosting.info/registrars/reports/total_domains/GODADDY.COM">WebHostingInfo</a>, GoDaddy did see a very slight loss of total domains across the month of December, including high profile sites like Wikipedia and Imgur, their global market shares actually increased steadily as the month went on. While the gains were slight, it was more than enough to offset the defections of domain owners from GoDaddy. Yes, there was a minor dip in their market share for the first of December but that was way before GoDaddy started getting all that negative press for their SOPA support so it can hardly even be considered noteworthy to this context.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Global Market Shares" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/pictures/godaddymarketshares.jpg" alt="" width="492" height="192" /></p>
<p>Looking at the weekly data of global market shares is like reading an abbreviated version of domain owners&#8217; thought bubbles:</p>
<p>November 28, 2011 &#8211; &#8220;GoDaddy. Internets. So full now.&#8221;</p>
<p>December 5, 2011 &#8211; &#8220;Burp.&#8221;</p>
<p>December 12, 2011 &#8211; &#8220;Feel better now.&#8221;</p>
<p>December 19, 2011 &#8211; &#8220;Yawn. Nap maybe? Mm&#8217;hmm.&#8221;</p>
<p>December 26, 2011 (SOPA press starts to pick up steam) &#8211; &#8220;Oh. SOPA? Soup on. Coupon! Space look pretty tonight.&#8221;</p>
<p>January 2, 2012 &#8211; &#8220;Hangovers such super something something. GoDaddy? Mmm, yes, have some.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously, for every defector that saddled up with new domain registration services someone either transferred their domain to GoDaddy or else just registered a new domain with them. While GoDaddy lost a sizable amount of domains after the great SOPA revelation of Christmas weekend, the loss was entirely offset by the total amount of domains gained after the news of their <a title="SOPA" href="http://seonix.org/social-media/sopa-stop-online-piracy-act/">SOPA</a> support broke.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Sometimes you eat the bar, sometimes the bar eats you" src="http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/pictures/godaddygainslosses.jpg" alt="" width="569" height="472" /></p>
<p>In the end, what does any of this mean? Well, for one, GoDaddy&#8217;s global market shares grew a little despite all the SOPAness of last month meaning the number of people registering domains outside of the U.S. might be considerable enough that GoDaddy doesn&#8217;t need to worry about any losses States-side. The second conclusion you can draw from this data, and perhaps more disheartening, is that there&#8217;s plenty of people registering domains in the U.S. that simply don&#8217;t give a toss about GoDaddy&#8217;s politics. Supposing the second conclusion is valid, don&#8217;t expect any volte-faces from GoDaddy the next time they find themselves in possession of an unfavorable opinion &#8211; they&#8217;re not going to lose. So rather than quickly change their mind so as to appease the unsettled masses, expect the domain registrar to lean back, prop their feet up on the desk and casually reply, &#8220;Do you see care anywhere on my face?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because you likely won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/people-dont-really-caregodaddy-supports-sopa-2012-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abandon GoDaddy Day Wasn&#8217;t a Smash Hit</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/abandon-godaddy-day-wasnt-a-smash-hit-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/abandon-godaddy-day-wasnt-a-smash-hit-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoveYourDomain Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=86299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The abandon ship notice for GoDaddy&#8217;s domain registration service, while netting some notable names &#8212; Wikipedia, Imgur &#8212; apparently failed to have the impact some suspected. If not for GoDaddy&#8217;s waffling on the SOPA/PIPA issue, something that&#8217;s discussed at an &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The abandon ship notice for GoDaddy&#8217;s domain registration service, while netting some notable names &#8212; Wikipedia, Imgur &#8212; apparently failed to have the impact some suspected.</p>
<p>If not for GoDaddy&#8217;s <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-experiences-massive-sopa-backlash-2011-12">waffling on the SOPA/PIPA issue</a>, something that&#8217;s discussed at an ad nauseam level across the Internet, the boycott that fizzled wouldn&#8217;t have happened.  Hype about the GoDaddy boycott was spurred on by the company&#8217;s competitors, with Namecheap being the foremost.  In order to capitalize on GoDaddy&#8217;s PR blunder, <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/moveyourdomain-day-could-be-another-blow-for-godaddy-2011-12">Namecheap went on an anti-SOPA promotional tirade</a>, creating a MoveYourDomain Day, where, for every domain transfer, Namecheap donated $1 to the Electronic Frontier Foundation to help the EFF&#8217;s fight against SOPA.</p>
<p>After 25,000 transfers, Namecheap upped the donation to $2 a transfer, and have, as of this writing, raised $61872 for the EFF.</p>
<p>That said, reports indicate that, despite Namecheap&#8217;s relatively successful promotion, the GoDaddy boycott largely fell flat.  As indicated, there were some high profile losses for GoDaddy, <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111230/01453717233/godaddy-boycott-fizzles-twice-as-many-domains-transfer-as-out.shtml">but according to TechDirt&#8217;s research</a>, on the day the boycott/MoveYourDomain Day was supposed to take place (12/29), GoDaddy gaining more domains than they lost:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Looking at the <a href="http://www.dailychanges.com/transfers-in/" target="_blank">results from DailyChanges</a> shows that GoDaddy actually had a strongly <em>positive</em> day, netting 20,748 more domains at the end of the day than the beginning. On transfers alone, there were nearly <em>double</em> the number of transfers in as out&#8230;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>While the boycott may have fallen flat, at least for GoDaddy abandonment, the initial backlash was strong enough to make GoDaddy reconsider their stances on the protection acts.  Was this a convenient change of heart for the &#8220;risque&#8221; domain registrar?  Perhaps, but once GoDaddy started losing customers, it quickly changed its course. </p>
<p>The question is, was it for marketing purposes &#8212; as in, please don&#8217;t leave us &#8212; or did GoDaddy actually sit down and reconsider their position on the protection acts?  I know where I&#8217;d place my wager.  What about you?  Lets us know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/abandon-godaddy-day-wasnt-a-smash-hit-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MoveYourDomain Day Could Be Another Blow For GoDaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/moveyourdomain-day-could-be-another-blow-for-godaddy-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/moveyourdomain-day-could-be-another-blow-for-godaddy-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoveYourDomain Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NameCheap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=86097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it&#8217;s being presented as an anti-SOPA stance, which, no doubt represents the bow that&#8217;s being put on it, but if MoveYourDomain Day isn&#8217;t occurring to capitalize on GoDaddy&#8217;s recent public relations nightmare, then maybe I need to go back &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s being presented as an anti-SOPA stance, which, no doubt represents the bow that&#8217;s being put on it, but if MoveYourDomain Day isn&#8217;t occurring to capitalize on GoDaddy&#8217;s recent public relations nightmare, then maybe I need to go back to marketing class.</p>
<p>What we have here is a domain registrar &#8212; Namecheap &#8212; taking a stand against SOPA, but at the same time, they are trying to attract sites and companies that have abandoned GoDaddy in the wake of their pro-SOPA stance, something GoDaddy has backed off from. Because some (many?) view GoDaddy&#8217;s recently-discovered anti-SOPA position as backtracking for the sake of saving their business, the fallout has presented Namecheap with an opportunity to increase their business.</p>
<p>In order to do so, Namecheap is telling anyone who will listen about their anti-SOPA position.  In fact, one of the current coupon codes for the service is &#8220;SOPASucks,&#8221; which demonstrates the company&#8217;s outspoken stance on the infamous protection act making its way through the houses of government.  To further entice those wanting to leave SOPA-friendly domain registrars, Namecheap has created the &#8220;MoveYourDomain Day&#8221; movement, and for every domain transferred, Namecheap will donate one dollar to Electronic Frontier Foundation, one of the watchdog groups opposing SOPA.</p>
<p>Namecheap has even created <a href="https://www.namecheap.com/moveyourdomainday.aspx">a page to promote MoveYourDomain Day</a>, which takes place on Thursday, December 29th.  Here, the Namecheap CEO polishes the anti-SOPA bow with the following call to arms:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>While we at Namecheap firmly believe in intellectual property rights, SOPA is like detonating a nuclear bomb on the internet when only a surgical strike is necessary. This legislation has the potential to harm the way everyone uses the Internet and to undermine the system itself. At Namecheap, we believe having a free and open Internet is the only option that will continue the legacy of innovation and openess that stands for everything we all value in our modern society.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>As you can see, Namecheap&#8217;s stance on SOPA is like that of most opponents:  we respect intellectual property, but we don&#8217;t want it protected by a law like SOPA.  It should be noted that Namecheap takes the high road and does not mention their competitor by name, but one wonders that, <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-experiences-massive-sopa-backlash-2011-12">without GoDaddy&#8217;s mishandling of their SOPA mess</a>, would Namecheap be so aggressive with their MoveYourDomain approach?</p>
<p>Naturally, the EFF supports Namecheap&#8217;s position and welcome their support with open arms:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>Shari Steele, Executive Director of EFF stated</strong></p>
<p>EFF is pleased to support Namecheap&#8217;s efforts to bring attention to the proposed SOPA legislation and its consequences for Internet users worldwide. With the funds donated from the MoveYourDomainDay effort, EFF will continue to defend your right to free expression in the digital world.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>With that in mind, is this an example of a timely marketing response, especially when your chief competitor is one suffering?  One company&#8217;s failure, at least in the mind of their ship-abandoning customers, is another company&#8217;s potential windfall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/moveyourdomain-day-could-be-another-blow-for-godaddy-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another SOPA Casualty: Imgur To Leave GoDaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/another-sopa-casualty-imgur-to-leave-godaddy-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/another-sopa-casualty-imgur-to-leave-godaddy-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imgur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=86058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, we discussed the mass exodus domain registrar GoDaddy has been dealing with due to their SOPA support, something GoDaddy backed off of, but only after the damage had been done. While Wikipedia represents perhaps the most famous of the &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, we discussed the mass exodus domain registrar GoDaddy has been dealing with due to their SOPA support, <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-tries-to-reverse-the-sopa-exodus-2011-12">something GoDaddy backed off of</a>, but only after the damage had been done.</p>
<p>While Wikipedia represents perhaps the most famous of the sites willing to leave GoDaddy&#8217;s service, another popular service, <a href="http://imgur.com/">Imgur.com</a>, is in the process of moving its domain away from GoDaddy&#8217;s index.  While Imgur&#8217;s popularity is not on Wikipedia&#8217;s scale, seeing how it&#8217;s the image hosting service of choice for Reddit members, its popularity has <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/reddit-helped-make-imgur-into-a-big-deal-2011-09">grown exponentially</a> over the last year.</p>
<p>Now, it appears as if GoDaddy&#8217;s previous SOPA support will cost them another popular domain:</p>
<style type="text/css">.ditto150292083679297536{background: #aeccc0 url(http://a0.twimg.com/profile_background_images/381628854/ows.jpg) no-repeat;padding: 20px;} .ditto150292083679297536 a { color: #60647a;} p.dittoTweet{background: #fff;padding: 10px 12px 10px 50px;margin: 0;min-height: 48px;color: #000;font-size: 18px !important;line-height: 22px;-moz-border-radius: 5px;-webkit-border-radius: 5px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata {display: block;width: 100%;clear: both;margin-top: 8px;padding-top: 12px;height: 65px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata span.author {line-height: 22px;color: #666;font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;} .mainlink {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 26px;color: #1F98C7;text-decoration: none;} .mainlink: hover {color: #1F98C7;text-decoration: underline;} .tweet {font-size: 24px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata span.author img {float: left; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px;} p.dittoTweet a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} p.dittoTweet span.timestamp {font-size: 12px;display: block;color: #999;} p.dittoTweet span.timestamp a {color: #999;text-decoration: none;}</style>
<div class="ditto150292083679297536">
<p class="dittoTweet"><span class="metadata"><span class="author"><a href="http://twitter.com/stillgray"><img src="http://a3.twimg.com/profile_images/1344897062/20110509-DSC_0156_normal.jpg"/></a><strong><a href="http://twitter.com/stillgray" class="mainlink">@stillgray</a></strong><br />Ian Miles Cheong</span></span>XKCD and Imgur are both hosted on GoDaddy. They should move to a better host in opposition of <a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23SOPA">#SOPA</a><span class="timestamp"><a href="http://www.twitter.com"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/socialditto/twitter-bird.png" border="0" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/stillgray/status/150292083679297536" title="Fri Dec 23 19:09:59 +0000 2011">4 days ago</a>  via <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/twitter/id409789998?mt=12" rel="nofollow">Twitter for Mac</a>&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;powered by <a href="http://www.socialditto.com">@socialditto</a></span></p>
</div>
<style type="text/css">.ditto151966977655701504{background: #C0DEED url(http://a0.twimg.com/images/themes/theme1/bg.png) no-repeat;padding: 20px;} .ditto151966977655701504 a { color: #0084B4;} p.dittoTweet{background: #fff;padding: 10px 12px 10px 50px;margin: 0;min-height: 48px;color: #000;font-size: 18px !important;line-height: 22px;-moz-border-radius: 5px;-webkit-border-radius: 5px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata {display: block;width: 100%;clear: both;margin-top: 8px;padding-top: 12px;height: 65px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata span.author {line-height: 22px;color: #666;font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;} .mainlink {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 26px;color: #1F98C7;text-decoration: none;} .mainlink: hover {color: #1F98C7;text-decoration: underline;} .tweet {font-size: 24px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata span.author img {float: left; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px;} p.dittoTweet a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} p.dittoTweet span.timestamp {font-size: 12px;display: block;color: #999;} p.dittoTweet span.timestamp a {color: #999;text-decoration: none;}</style>
<div class="ditto151966977655701504">
<p class="dittoTweet"><span class="metadata"><span class="author"><a href="http://twitter.com/imgur"><img src="http://a3.twimg.com/profile_images/1077675026/Imgur_Logo_Icon_normal.png"/></a><strong><a href="http://twitter.com/imgur" class="mainlink">@imgur</a></strong><br />Imgur</span></span><a href="http://twitter.com/stillgray">@stillgray</a> It&#8217;s in the works.<span class="timestamp"><a href="http://www.twitter.com"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/socialditto/twitter-bird.png" border="0" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/imgur/status/151966977655701504" title="Wed Dec 28 10:05:25 +0000 2011">7 hours ago</a>  via web&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;powered by <a href="http://www.socialditto.com">@socialditto</a></span></p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.gameranx.com/updates/id/4225/article/imgur-to-boycott-godaddy-over-sopa-support/">As pointed out by Gameranx</a>, and other bloggers <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70878.html">who fear SOPA&#8217;s impact</a>, SOPA poses a direct threat to the kind of content Imgur features, which explains their desire to move.  Yes, GoDaddy backtracked, but clearly, some doubt the sincerity of GoDaddy&#8217;s new, anti-SOPA stance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/another-sopa-casualty-imgur-to-leave-godaddy-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy Tries To Reverse The SOPA Exodus</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-tries-to-reverse-the-sopa-exodus-2011-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-tries-to-reverse-the-sopa-exodus-2011-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=85906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After dealing with backlash of the worst kind &#8212; the kind that makes you lose customers, fast &#8212; GoDaddy withdrew their support for SOPA with press releases and Twitter announcements. But was that enough? Not for one ex-GoDaddy customer, who &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After dealing with backlash of the worst kind &#8212; the kind that makes you lose customers, fast &#8212; GoDaddy withdrew their support for SOPA with press releases and Twitter announcements.  But was that enough?</p>
<p>Not for one ex-GoDaddy customer, <a href="https://plus.google.com/111996409013825587891/posts/7AMw7gDQ7Bi">who detailed his exchange with one of their customer service representatives on Google+</a>.  Chris Heald&#8217;s post not only documents why he left, SOPA support, but he also details the surprising level of defeat GoDaddy&#8217;s customer service staff must be feeling as they try and woo back previous customers.</p>
<p>The first thing that stood out to me, besides the legitimate reason Heald has for moving his 60-plus domains to one of GoDaddy&#8217;s competitors.  Heald believes GoDaddy essentially blew the criticism off.  That is, until the mass exodus began:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The rep was quite sincere in his apology to me, asked if there was anything they could do to win me back. He had a &#8220;We support IP protections, and now realize that support of SOPA is too broad&#8221; song-and-dance routine that probably came in from a PR memo today. I told him &#8220;no thanks&#8221;, and that was that. I&#8217;m impressed by the customer service hustle, but it shows that this little incident really spooked them.</p>
<p>I think that the backlash against their support was a lot more swift and severe than they&#8217;d anticipated. Their initially glib &#8220;lol, whatever&#8221; response was replaced by &#8220;oh god, please stop punching us in the quarterly financial report!&#8221; real fast.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Considering the amount of turnover GoDaddy experienced, the backtracking shouldn&#8217;t be surprising, even with the existence of GoDaddy CEO tweets like the following:</p>
<style type="text/css">.ditto150291599971196928{background: #FFF url(http://a0.twimg.com/profile_background_images/276430082/warren_blogimage.jpg) no-repeat;padding: 20px;} .ditto150291599971196928 a { color: #04094e;} p.dittoTweet{background: #fff;padding: 10px 12px 10px 50px;margin: 0;min-height: 48px;color: #000;font-size: 18px !important;line-height: 22px;-moz-border-radius: 5px;-webkit-border-radius: 5px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata {display: block;width: 100%;clear: both;margin-top: 8px;padding-top: 12px;height: 65px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata span.author {line-height: 22px;color: #666;font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;} .mainlink {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 26px;color: #1F98C7;text-decoration: none;} .mainlink: hover {color: #1F98C7;text-decoration: underline;} .tweet {font-size: 24px;} p.dittoTweet span.metadata span.author img {float: left; margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px;} p.dittoTweet a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} p.dittoTweet span.timestamp {font-size: 12px;display: block;color: #999;} p.dittoTweet span.timestamp a {color: #999;text-decoration: none;}</style>
<div class="ditto150291599971196928">
<p class="dittoTweet"><span class="metadata"><span class="author"><a href="http://twitter.com/asocialcontract"><img src="http://a2.twimg.com/profile_images/1696833663/warren_normal.jpg"/></a><strong><a href="http://twitter.com/asocialcontract" class="mainlink">@asocialcontract</a></strong><br />Warren Adelman</span></span>We listened to our customers. GoDaddy no longer supports SOPA <a href="http://t.co/XHNuuYbY" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/XHNuuYbY</a><span class="timestamp"><a href="http://www.twitter.com"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/socialditto/twitter-bird.png" border="0" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/asocialcontract/status/150291599971196928" title="Fri Dec 23 19:08:04 +0000 2011">3 days ago</a>  via web&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;powered by <a href="http://www.socialditto.com">@socialditto</a></span></p>
</div>
<p>To many ex-GoDaddy customers, this is a &#8220;too little, too late&#8221; reaction from a company that seems more concerned about winning their customers back than they do about taking a stand against SOPA.  As for Heald, he sees GoDaddy&#8217;s backtracking as a win for consumers:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>GoDaddy capitulating is a huge win, because it&#8217;s the first stone to come out of the wall. Now that GoDaddy has demonstrated that they were taking too much damage to continue with their support of SOPA, it empowers people to exert similar pressure on other companies, and it demonstrates to those companies that there are enough angry people out there that you need to listen up and pay attention.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Heald also points out the ones at GoDaddy who will truly suffer for the SOPA backlash will be the customer service reps who have to call ex-customers in an effort to win them back:</p>
<blockquote><p><em> I feel really bad for the customer service reps that have to do damage control on this. You know that they&#8217;re going to be pulling overtime this Christmas weekend because their bosses screwed up. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Who knows?  Maybe GoDaddy pays double time during Holiday hours&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/godaddy-tries-to-reverse-the-sopa-exodus-2011-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/45 queries in 0.028 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 675/779 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 04:09:16 -->
