<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; GMnext</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/gmnext/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New GM Site Asks For Audience Participation</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/new-gm-site-asks-for-audience-participation-2008-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/new-gm-site-asks-for-audience-participation-2008-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caverly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMnext]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=43123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'll admit: from a design standpoint, it looks decent.&#160; Also, in terms of text, all the right words are evident: &#34;Blog,&#34;<img align="right" alt="New GM Site Asks For Audience Participation" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/gmlogo.jpg" /> &#34;Podcasts,&#34; &#34;Videos,&#34; &#34;Our Thoughts/Your Thoughts.&#34;&#160; Still, there are reasons to be suspicious about GM's new community site, GMnext.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll admit: from a design standpoint, it looks decent.&nbsp; Also, in terms of text, all the right words are evident: &quot;Blog,&quot;<img align="right" alt="New GM Site Asks For Audience Participation" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/gmlogo.jpg" /> &quot;Podcasts,&quot; &quot;Videos,&quot; &quot;Our Thoughts/Your Thoughts.&quot;&nbsp; Still, there are reasons to be suspicious about GM&#8217;s new community site, GMnext.</p>
<p><span id="more-43123"></span>
<p><a title="GMnext Homepage" href="http://www.gmnext.com/">GMnext</a> is purportedly all about dialogue and buyer feedback, but in launching it, GM seems to have ignored existing sources of information.&nbsp; The popular <a title="Corvette Forum" href="http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zeromain">Corvette Forum</a> has around 175,000 members, for example, and many other forums are dedicated to different models and brands.&nbsp; GM could have sent representatives to them instead of starting its own community from scratch.</p>
<p>Looking forward, I&#8217;ll also note that there&#8217;s nothing new about the topics &quot;Design,&quot; &quot;Tech,&quot; and &quot;Green&quot; on GMnext, yet for some reason, having this fresh place to talk is supposed to result in huge changes.</p>
<p>Hopefully my reaction is a case of too much <a title="Slashdot's Take On GMnext" href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/04/2045222&amp;from=rss">cynicism</a>; few things would be nicer than seeing shipments of small, fast, fuel-efficient, and reliable cars appear on the lots of GM&#8217;s dealers.&nbsp; This is just a website&#8217;s launch, however, and I&#8217;m not going to get too optimistic until that happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/new-gm-site-asks-for-audience-participation-2008-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 193/204 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-12 20:28:05 -->
