<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Flash Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/flash-video/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why BBC Doesn&#8217;t Use Flash (Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/why-bbc-doesnt-use-flash-video-2007-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/why-bbc-doesnt-use-flash-video-2007-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Richter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=34771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you based in the UK (and probably some of you who aren't) may have noticed some <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/01/audiovisual_changes_on_the_way.html" class="bluelink">recent changes on the BBC website</a>, in particular the update to the audio and video player which now uses Windows Media Player as well as Real Player (it used to be just Real).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you based in the UK (and probably some of you who aren&#8217;t) may have noticed some <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/01/audiovisual_changes_on_the_way.html" class="bluelink">recent changes on the BBC website</a>, in particular the update to the audio and video player which now uses Windows Media Player as well as Real Player (it used to be just Real).</p>
<p><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/bbcnewslogo.gif" align="left">Steve Hermann, BBC News Editor, has now <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/01/in_response_to_site_changes.html" class="bluelink">posted a reply</a> to user comments and in particular he details why the BBC chose not to use Flash Video for its news stories. </p>
<p>Reading in <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/01/in_response_to_site_changes.html" class="bluelink">between the lines</a> it seems that the overwhelming reason is cost due to the heavy investments the BBC has made into other platforms, infrastructure and so on, all of which related to non-Flash technologies.</p>
<p>The BBC streams a ton of video and audio content, both live and on demand. I</p>
<p>t would of course be a mammoth task to migrate this to Flash &#8211; and likely to be very expensive not only to set up but also to run &#8211; I hope Adobe takes note and considers loosening the licensing screw for Flash Media Server a bit.</p>
<p>One positive fact is the overwhelming push for Flash by the BBC website visitors, just check out the comments <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/01/audiovisual_changes_on_the_way.html#commentsanchor" class="bluelink">on this post</a>. </p>
<p>Wow, public opinion has definitely shifted towards Flash and most readers appear to agree that Real sucks, WMP is ok-ish (if you&#8217;re not on a Mac) and that Flash would be a very welcome addition, backed by the already existing platforms.</p>
<p>Hermann agrees that Flash Video would be up for the job, both in quality and penetration, but that timing was bad as the BBC is essentially set up for Real and Windows Media and not for (streaming) Flash Video.</p>
<p>I really feel that Hermann would use Flash in a second if he could but unfortunately the BBC is a huge organization and they must generate some ROI on behalf of license fee payers for their Real and Windows Media investments, and that&#8217;s understandable. </p>
<p>I think they call this a tie-in <img src='http://www.webpronews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flashcomguru.com/index.cfm/2007/1/24/Why-we-dont-use-Flash-video--The-BBC-speaks-up#comments" class="bluelink">Comments</a></p>
<p>Tag:   </p>
<p><a href="javascript:location.href='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'&#038;title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)"><img  src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/reddit.png" border=0>Reddit</a> | <a href="javascript:location.href='http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?u='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+'&#038;t='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)+ '   '"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/furl-pic.png" border=0> Furl</a> </p>
<p> Bookmark WebProNews: <a href="http://www.webpronews.com"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/wpn-readit.jpg" border=0></a></p>
<p>Stefan is a certified Flash Developer who has been involved with Flash Media<br />
Server since its very early days. From his home office in the UK he has<br />
handled a variety of projects, specializing in Flash Video and Rich Internet<br />
Applications for clients that include CNET, USA Network and Unilever. Stefan<br />
is the author of a series of Adobe Developer Center articles, has spoken at<br />
several industry events and contributes a regular column on Flash Video to<br />
Streaming Media Magazine. His site <a href="http://www.flashcomguru.com">www.flashcomguru.com</a> is one of the<br />
largest online resources on Flash Video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/why-bbc-doesnt-use-flash-video-2007-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Times Have Changed for Flash Video</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/how-times-have-changed-for-flash-video-2006-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/how-times-have-changed-for-flash-video-2006-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Richter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apollo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=33874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been digging around on a few technology websites and came across a few interesting articles, some from way back (who remembers <a href="http://www.cnet.com/4520-10201_1-5565480-1.html?tag=txt" class="bluelink">CNET's Talk to us live</a> series, courtesy of FCS? This was cutting edge back then. Check out the christmas countdown: -726 days left LOL).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been digging around on a few technology websites and came across a few interesting articles, some from way back (who remembers <a href="http://www.cnet.com/4520-10201_1-5565480-1.html?tag=txt" class="bluelink">CNET&#8217;s Talk to us live</a> series, courtesy of FCS? This was cutting edge back then. Check out the christmas countdown: -726 days left LOL).</p>
<p><a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39118609,00.htm?r=2" class="bluelink">This article on ZDNet</a> from 2003 talks about Macromedia&#8217;s plans to push Flash Video as a technology and how streaming video has just been added to the Flash Player. Remember, Flash Communication Server 1.0 was released in 2002 pretty much alongside Flash MX &#8211; which incidentally also introduced the ability to embed video content directly into Flash. Embedding never took off and rightly so as it was riddled with problems such as audio sync issues, tricky to update and massive SWF files.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting how in that article a guy called Richard Doherty points out how Flash as a media format is still running well behind Windows Media, RealPlayer and Apple&#8217;s QuickTime. &#8220;They&#8217;re still paying catch-up way behind Real,&#8221; he said. </p>
<p>Way behind Real&#8230; it&#8217;s 2006 and here I sit wondering if there&#8217;s anybody not in front of Real right now.</p>
<p>You would have thought that a few years later in 2005 Flash Video would have been more widely accepted. <a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,1000000097,39211831-1,00.htm" class="bluelink">Another ZDNet article</a> was published previous to the Flash 8 release. In mid 2005, Flash Video &#8221; could make it a significant threat to Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Media technology, RealNetworks&#8217; Real format and Apple&#8217;s QuickTime&#8221;. Hear hear. Not only that but &#8220;it could cause Real, Apple and Microsoft some concern since it will evolve into a competitive platform for streaming video.&#8221; Word.</p>
<p>It comes as no real (no pun intended) surprise then that Real&#8217;s senior VP of media for Real Networks was quoted in that article with the prase &#8220;Flash doesn&#8217;t have digital rights management, and studios care about DRM. We are focused on intellectual property that has value, where DRM matters. Flash is fine for ads, but none of the studios are going to do this.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but smile at this&#8230; This is such a naive view today and it already was in 2005. &#8216;Intellectual property that has value&#8217;&#8230; does that mean if it&#8217;s not got DRM it has no value? Hmm not quite right is it, at least Google was more than happy to pay short of a couple of billion dollars for a Flash Video portal named YouTube. </p>
<p>Don;t get me started in DRM, but if Real wants to live in the past then all the better for Flash. Wooosh, that was Flash Video in the fast lane, wizzing past Real which seems to have had a breakdown back at the last junction.</p>
<p>Microsoft of course had to have their say too and boldly stated that &#8220;Flash is receiving some good uptake on the Internet today, it has limited applications beyond short form, streamed content&#8221;. Aight, whatever. If reaching every user in every corner of the net is limited then that&#8217;s fine by me. How Microsoft&#8217;s own approach isn&#8217;t limited is beyond me as every Mac user will confirm.</p>
<p>So in 2005, Flash Video was starting to eat away at the market&#8230; </p>
<p>Now here we are in 2006 &#8211; almost 2007 &#8211; and times truly have changed. Flash Video is just about everywhere (Tom Green has written a good article on this topic &#8211; <a href="http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_1/" class="bluelink">The Rise of Flash Video</a>) and it has certainly claimed many online landmarks for itself. Granted, there&#8217;s still some work to be done when it comes to offline playback and downloadable formats but I am sure Adobe will keep these shortcomings in mind for future releases of Flash, Flex and the upcoming <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo" class="bluelink">Apollo</a> runtime.</p>
<p>Overall I think it&#8217;s fair to say that 2006 was the year of online video, and Flash Video in particular. What&#8217;s around the corner? If Adobe have their way then <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo" class="bluelink">Apollo</a> will be on everyone&#8217;s desktop come 2008 and I personally predict a rise in Flash&#8217;s Live Video capabilities in 2007. Judging by som eof the project requests that are coming in I will definitely concentrate some of my efforts in this area.</p>
<p>On this note let me wish you all a very happy christmas and a successful 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flashcomguru.com/index.cfm/2006/12/20/Flash-Video--How-times-have-changed#comments" class="bluelink">Comments</a></p>
<p>Tag: </p>
<p><a href="javascript:location.href='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+encodeURIComp onent(location.href)+'&#038;title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)"><img  src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/reddit.png border=0>Reddit</a> | <a href="javascript:location.href='http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?u='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+'&#038;t='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)+ ' '"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/furl-pic.png border=0> Furl</a></p>
<p>Bookmark WebProNews: <a href=http://www.webpronews.com><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/wpn-readit.jpg border=0></a></p>
<p>Stefan is a certified Flash Developer who has been involved with Flash Media<br />
Server since its very early days. From his home office in the UK he has<br />
handled a variety of projects, specializing in Flash Video and Rich Internet<br />
Applications for clients that include CNET, USA Network and Unilever. Stefan<br />
is the author of a series of Adobe Developer Center articles, has spoken at<br />
several industry events and contributes a regular column on Flash Video to<br />
Streaming Media Magazine. His site <a href="http://www.flashcomguru.com">www.flashcomguru.com</a> is one of the<br />
largest online resources on Flash Video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/how-times-have-changed-for-flash-video-2006-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 256/290 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 07:39:56 -->
