<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Error Pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/error-pages/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer Derided Over Google Domain Ad Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/lawyer-derided-over-google-domain-ad-suit-2008-07</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/lawyer-derided-over-google-domain-ad-suit-2008-07#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Error Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parked Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=46248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The litigant sought class action status for his lawsuit after an investment of $136.11 failed to bring him conversions from parked domains.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The litigant sought class action status for his lawsuit after an investment of $136.11 failed to bring him conversions from parked domains.<br />
<span id="more-46248"></span>
<p>
Industry observers witnessed various lawsuits against Google over the past few years, as litigants made accusations over issues like click fraud and their rankings in the search results.</p>
<p>
A recent lawsuit noted by <a href=http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/google/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=209100234>InformationWeek</a> finds Hal K. Levitte suing over his AdWords campaign, which ran in the summer of 2007. Ads that appeared on parked domains and on error pages generated some clicks, but no conversions.</p>
<p>
&#8220;Levitte spent $136.11 for ads on parked domains and error pages, which works out to 15.3% of his $887.67 ad campaign,&#8221; the report said.</p>
<p>
Once news of this legal kerfuffle emerged, industry observers weighed in with less than favorable commentary about Levitte&#8217;s action.</p>
<p>
&#8220;So a man got 668 clicks on his ads through one portion of his Google AdWords, and zero conversions,&#8221; <a href=http://www.traffick.com/2008/07/adsense-for-domains-target-of-lawsuit.asp>Andrew Goodman</a> said. &#8220;And for that, it&#8217;s seen as good enough reason for a lawsuit. Ever heard of testing?&#8221;</p>
<p>
&#8220;Although there is fraud on domain parking, this appears to be another manufactured lawsuit to milk Google for money,&#8221; <a href=http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/15/google-sued-over-parked-domain-names/>Domain Name Wire</a> said. &#8220;Only $136 worth of ads on parked domains is hardly a fair sample size. Perhaps he was advertising for a highly competitive topic with known high click prices.&#8221;</p>
<p>
Legal keywords like &#8216;mesothelioma lawyer&#8217; tend to merit substantially higher prices than most biddable possibilities. It seems highly unlikely a court will judge for this plaintiff for failing to be competitive in the market, but sometimes judges make odd decisions. We expect Google to do the usual &#8216;defend vigorously&#8217; thing in the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/lawyer-derided-over-google-domain-ad-suit-2008-07/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Have A Useful 404 Page?</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/do-you-have-a-useful-404-page-2007-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/do-you-have-a-useful-404-page-2007-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[404]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Error Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webmaster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=42031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crashing into a 404 page not found result when arriving from a link where the visitor expected to find useful content could make or break that person's expectations of that site.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crashing into a 404 page not found result when arriving from a link where the visitor expected to find useful content could make or break that person&#8217;s expectations of that site.<br />
<span id="more-42031"></span><br />
We have several creative epithets and colorful metaphors we apply to sites that vomit back a useless 404 result, especially when the preview of the link in either a search engine&#8217;s results, or comments on another site, lead us to believe the destination will be worth the visit.</p>
<p>
Other people run into that frustration, and according to monitoring site <a href=http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=216>Pingdom</a>, they are hitting it a lot in the top 100 websites as ranked by Alexa traffic.</p>
<p>
&#8220;Curious about how the big players on the web were handling this, we tested the 404 error pages for all the top 100 websites in the US and found that almost one in four had an inadequate 404 error page. Sinners include Google, Match.com, YouTube, Blogger, Megaupload and many more,&#8221; Pingdom noted in their post.</p>
<p>
Webmasters can do a better job with their 404 pages. Instead of just bringing the visit to an abrupt end, like Match.com does with a blank page, the 404 offers an opportunity to provide the visitor with a reason to stay on the site and look around rather than hitting the Back button automatically.</p>
<p>
Pingdom particularly liked what <a href=http://www.weather.com>Weather.com</a> does with its 404 results. Weather.com identifies itself, has links to its other services, and provides a search option to find weather forecasts. It&#8217;s much better than another 404 laggard, Google, which tosses out branded page not found error 404s.</p>
<p>
<small></small></p>
<p>
<a href=http://twitter.com/dutter/>follow me on Twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/do-you-have-a-useful-404-page-2007-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 246/268 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-12 23:35:25 -->
