<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/domains/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:04:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Updates Indexing To Treat TLDs Differently</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/google-updates-indexing-to-treat-tlds-differently-2013-05</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/google-updates-indexing-to-treat-tlds-differently-2013-05#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cctlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLDs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=227893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has been updating its indexing systems to treat some TLDs differently than in the past. Some country-code TLDs are being treated as generic TLDs. The list, which may still change more over time, of generic country code TLDs is &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has been updating its indexing systems to treat some TLDs differently than in the past. Some country-code TLDs are being treated as generic TLDs. </p>
<p>The list, which may still change more over time, of generic country code TLDs is as follows: .ad, .as, .bz, .cc, .cd, .co, .dj, .fm, .gg, .io, .la, .me, .ms, .nu, .sc, .sr, .su, .tv, .tk and .ws.  </p>
<p>Google&#8217;s Pierre Far shared the news in a Google+ post (<a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-cctld-generics-16729.html">via Search Engine Roundtable</a>).</p>
<style type="text/css"> div.dittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g { font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g { background-color: #FFF; padding: 10px; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost { text-align: left; margin: 0 0 0 60px; min-height: 50px; color: #000; font-size: 13px!important; line-height: 18px; border: 1px solid #CCC; padding: 10px; -moz-border-radius: 4px; border-radius: 4px; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.pic { display: block; float: left; padding: 0 10px 0 0 } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.pic a img { border: 0; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost div.author { display: block; line-height: 15px; padding-bottom: 10px } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost div.author a { text-decoration: none; color: #000; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost div.author a:hover { text-decoration: none; color: #06C; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.googleIcon { float: right; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g span.timestamp { padding-left: 10px; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost span.metadata { display: block; font-size: 12px!important; line-height: 13px; padding: 10px 3px 0 3px; color: #C84035; font-weight: bold; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost span a.timestamp, div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost span a.timestamp:hover { color: #999; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11px; font-weight: normal; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost span.pic img { width: 50px; height: 50px; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost span.metadata .fbextra { color: #385998; text-decoration: none; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost a, div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost a:visited { color: #06C; text-decoration: none; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.dittoPost a:hover { color: #06C; text-decoration: underline; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g .proflinkPrefix { color: #999; } div.innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g div.google-plus-photo { background: #111; outline: 1px solid #666; text-align: center; width: 100%; margin-top: 10px; } </style>
<div class="dittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g">
<div class="innerdittoboxgooglez13qi12qlubfct1gm04cd5cqty2vvduhn4g">
<div class="pic"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-EDh5By6ua5M/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAOE/Drov4cdAx5k/photo.jpg" alt="Pierre Far" width="50" /></div>
<div class="dittoPost">
<div class="author">
<div class="googleIcon"><img src="http://images1.ientrymail.com/socialditto/googleplus/plusicon.gif" width="14" height="14" align="absmiddle" alt="" /></div>
<p><a href="https://plus.google.com/115984868678744352358">Pierre Far</a><span class="timestamp"><a href="https://plus.google.com/115984868678744352358/posts/RRmd67776wm" title="Wednesday May 1, 2013 at 7:56am" class="timestamp">1 day ago</a></span></div>
<p><b>Expanded list of ccTLDs treated as Generic ccTLDs</b></p>
<p>Over the past few months, we&#39;ve been updating our indexing systems to treat certain country country-code TLDs as generic TLDs; that is, even though the top-level domain has a country code, we would treat it, by default, as not targeting a specific country. Now that all the pieces are in place, we also updated our Help Center article listing the TLDs we treat as gTLDs:</p>
<p><a href="http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1347922" class="ot-anchor" rel="nofollow">http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1347922</a></p>
<p>The latest addition includes the quite-popular (and personal favorite <img src='http://www.webpronews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) <i>.io</i>.<br />
<hr /><a href="http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=1347922">Geotargetable domains &#8211; Webmaster Tools Help</a><br />Generic top-level domains (gTLDs) don&#8217;t target specific countries. If your site has a generic top-level domain, such as .com, .org, or any of the domains listed below, and targets users in a particula&#8230; <span class="metadata"><span style="float: right"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/socialditto/googleplus/plus.gif" alt="" />20 &nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/socialditto/googleplus/arrow.gif" alt="" />0 </span><a href="http://socialditto.com/" class="timestamp">Powered by socialditto</a></span>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/matt-cutts-talks-location-and-cctlds-2013-02">recently did a Webmaster Help video</a> discussing location and ccTLDs. If you&#8217;re reading this article, you might find it helpful. You can get the gist of it in text if you click the link, in case you don&#8217;t feel like sitting through the two-and-a-half-minute video. </p>
<p><center><iframe width="616" height="347" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QCozweHGTk0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/google-updates-indexing-to-treat-tlds-differently-2013-05/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pirate Bay Moves To The Caribbean To Avoid Domain Seizure</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/the-pirate-bay-moves-to-the-caribbean-to-avoid-domain-seizure-2013-04</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/the-pirate-bay-moves-to-the-caribbean-to-avoid-domain-seizure-2013-04#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Walton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sint Maarten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pirate Bay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=227587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, The Pirate Bay moved to Iceland&#8217;s .is domain in hopes of escaping the ever watchful eye of the entertainment industry and its army of lawyers. It seemed that the infamous site would be safe for at least a &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, The Pirate Bay <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/the-pirate-bay-moves-to-iceland-after-getting-kicked-out-of-greeland-2013-04">moved to Iceland&#8217;s .is domain</a> in hopes of escaping the ever watchful eye of the entertainment industry and its army of lawyers. It seemed that the infamous site would be safe for at least a while, but that has turned out not to be the case. </p>
<p><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-moves-to-sx-as-prosecutor-files-motion-to-seize-domains-130430/">TorrentFreak</a> reports that The Pirate Bay has moved yet again. Those looking for the site will now be directed to a .sx domain. The .sx TLD belongs to the small island nation of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint_Maarten">Sint Maarten</a>, a constituent country owned by both The Netherlands and France. </p>
<p>So, what prompted the move to a new domain? It seems that the Swedish authorities have finally moved to take the .se domain that The Pirate Bay operated under for over a year. While they were at it, the authorities also filed a motion to seize the .is domain that The Pirate Bay recently moved to last week. </p>
<p>The folks behind The Pirate Bay saw this coming earlier this year, and have long since vacated the .se domain. Those visiting the site&#8217;s .se domain will be redirected to the new .sx domain though. If the authorities are successful in seizing the domain, those visiting the .se or .is domains will no longer be automatically redirected to whichever home The Pirate Bay decides to move to. </p>
<p>Of course, this latest development might bring a novel legal fight to the forefront as Sweden argues it has jurisdiction over the .is domain because it&#8217;s owned by a Swedish national. The company that operates the .is domain &#8211; INSIC &#8211; told TorrentFreak that Sweden&#8217;s argument may not hold much weight in court because the domain is still owned by INSIC, an Icelandic company subject only to Icelandic laws. </p>
<p>In short, The Pirate Bay might get to keep the its .is domain if Sweden&#8217;s jurisdiction argument doesn&#8217;t hold up in court. Even if it does, The Pirate Bay can fall back on its new .sx domain. If that fails, The Pirate Bay still has hundreds of TLDs in which it can fall back on. Like I said last year, The Pirate Bay <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/the-pirate-bay-fighting-censorship-one-ip-address-at-a-time-2012-05">is in a war of attrition</a> and it&#8217;s winning. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/the-pirate-bay-moves-to-the-caribbean-to-avoid-domain-seizure-2013-04/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google On Buying Spammy Domains: Don&#8217;t Be The Guy Left Holding The Bag</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/google-on-buying-spammy-domains-dont-be-the-guy-left-holding-the-bag-2013-04</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/google-on-buying-spammy-domains-dont-be-the-guy-left-holding-the-bag-2013-04#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=224675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest Webmaster Help video from Google, Matt Cutts takes on an interesting topic. Can you buy a domain that has been penalized by Google for spam, clean it up and recover rankings? Well, it depends, and Cutts explains &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest Webmaster Help video from Google, Matt Cutts takes on an interesting topic. Can you buy a domain that has been penalized by Google for spam, clean it up and recover rankings? </p>
<p>Well, it depends, and Cutts explains why. </p>
<p><center><iframe width="616" height="347" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lGUw9oS5csI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
<p>&#8220;This is a tricky question because on the one hand there&#8217;s algorithmic spam, and then there&#8217;s manual spam, and all manual spam does have an eventual time out, so if you were to completely clean up all the content on the domain, [and] do a reconsideration request, in theory, that domain can recover,&#8221; says Cutts. &#8220;However, on the algorithmic side, if there are a ton of spammy links that the previous owner built up, that can be a little bit hard to go through, and try to clean up and get all those links taken down, and make a list of all those links.&#8221;</p>
<p>He continues, &#8220;The way to think about it is, there are a lot of spammers out there that do basically what&#8217;s known as a &#8216;churn and burn&#8217; tactic, where they just use as many techniques to try and make a domain rank as they can, and then as soon as that domain is awful or bad, or Google has caught it, then they sort of movie on, and they go on to some other exploit, and they try to tackle it with another domain. Now what you don&#8217;t want to do is be the guy who gets caught left holding the bag.&#8221;</p>
<p>Long story short: how bad do you really want this domain? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/google-on-buying-spammy-domains-dont-be-the-guy-left-holding-the-bag-2013-04/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Kills Blocked Sites Feature</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/google-kills-blocked-sites-feature-2013-03</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/google-kills-blocked-sites-feature-2013-03#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blocked sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=222214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About two years ago, when Google was in the early stages of the Panda update, it launched another means of helping users get more quality results in front of them. This one, unlike the Panda update, left it more up &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About two years ago, when Google was in the early stages of the Panda update, it launched another means of helping users get more quality results in front of them. This one, unlike the Panda update, left it more up to the users, giving them more control of their own. That was the domain blocking feature. </p>
<p>The feature has now been killed. Late last year, <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/google-isnt-blocking-domains-in-search-results-like-its-supposed-to-2012-12">people were noticing that the feature wasn&#8217;t working</a>. Now, Google has officially acknowledged its demise.Google says in a<a href="http://support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=1210386"> message on its Inside Search site</a> (<a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-blocked-sites-sunset-16549.html">via Search Engine Roundtable</a>): </p>
<p><em>The Blocked Sites feature is no longer available. To block particular sites from your search results, we recommend the <a href="http://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/personal-blocklist-by-goo/nolijncfnkgaikbjbdaogikpmpbdcdef">Personal Blocklist Chrome extension</a> from Google. You may also download your existing blocked sites list <a href="http://www.google.com/reviews/t">as a text file</a>.  </em></p>
<p>Google doesn&#8217;t offer much in the way of explanation as to why they killed the feature. Most likely, it wasn&#8217;t being used a whole lot, and really, isn&#8217;t the feature kind of an admission that Google is not getting results right? </p>
<p>At least for those who want to continue blocking sites, Google provides an alternative. That&#8217;s more that <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/what-the-industry-thinks-about-google-readers-demise-2013-03">Google Reader users got</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/google-kills-blocked-sites-feature-2013-03/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RSS.com Is Now for Sale with a $200K Asking Price</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/rss-com-is-now-for-sale-with-a-200k-asking-price-2013-03</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/rss-com-is-now-for-sale-with-a-200k-asking-price-2013-03#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Wolford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=221828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re the owner of RSS.com, there&#8217;s probably no better time than now to try and sell it. On the heels of Google&#8217;s decision to kill their popular Google Reader RSS feed product and the outrage spawned by that decision, &#8230;<br /><a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/136480/0/cc?z=1"><img src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/136480/0/vc?z=1&dim=105992&kw=&click=" width="615" height="80" border="0"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re the owner of RSS.com, there&#8217;s probably no better time than now to try and sell it. </p>
<p>On the heels of Google&#8217;s decision to <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/will-you-miss-google-reader-clearly-many-will-2013-03">kill their popular Google Reader RSS feed product</a> and the <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/save-google-reader-petition-quickly-tops-100000-signatures-2013-03">outrage</a> spawned by that decision, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ronsheridan">Ron Sheridan</a> is trying to sell RSS.com. The asking price? $200,000.</p>
<p>He initially acquired the doman for $125,000. </p>
<p>The sale is being brokered by <a href="http://signup.websitebrokerage.com/">WebsiteBrokerage.com</a>, who also represents brand.com, geo.org, and haircare.com</p>
<p><a href="http://signup.rss.com/">RSS.com</a> still boasts its plans, which is to &#8220;launch a high quality RSS reader, married to a crowd sourced, crowd curated RSS feed directory.&#8221; </p>
<p>They says that this &#8220;community approach will allow users to drill down to top subject matter content and experts quickly and efficiently.&#8221;</p>
<p>That plans never really worked out for Sheridan, and now he&#8217;s looking to sell.  </p>
<p>With Google Reader <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/google-reader-disappears-from-black-bar-menu-inside-gmail-google-2013-03">on the way out</a>, there&#8217;s now a giant void that must be filled (unless you think RSS is dead). Digg has <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/digg-were-building-a-reader-to-replace-google-reader-2013-03">announced plans</a> to build their own Reader replacement. Existing feed readers like Feedly and Newsblur are looking to capitalize on the many Google Reader users looking for an alternative. Will someone step up and bring RSS.com&#8217;s plans to life? 200 large is a pretty hefty asking price, but who knows?</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/03/21/up-for-sale-rss-com/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed:+TheNextWeb+(The+Next+Web+All+Stories)">The Next Web</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/rss-com-is-now-for-sale-with-a-200k-asking-price-2013-03/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demand Media Announces Domain Business HQ In Dublin</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-announces-domain-business-hq-in-dublin-2013-03</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-announces-domain-business-hq-in-dublin-2013-03#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eNom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=221573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demand Media announced today that it is opening its largest international office in Dublin, which will serve as the company&#8217;s international headquarters for its domain business. Last month, the company announced that it intends to split its content and domain &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demand Media announced today that it is opening its largest international office in Dublin, which will serve as the company&#8217;s international headquarters for its domain business. </p>
<p>Last month, the company announced that it intends to <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-to-split-into-two-public-companies-earnings-released-2013-02">split its content and domain businesses apart</a>. </p>
<p>Demand Media&#8217;s international presence currently includes offices in Toronto, Buenos Aires and London. The company says the Dublin team is focused on preparing for the big new TLD push, which will come to market this year. </p>
<p>“We are excited to expand our business into the thriving tech scene of Dublin,” said Demand Media EVP of emerging markets,  Dave Panos. “At such an exhilarating time in the domain services industry with the upcoming launch of new TLDs, we are eager to recruit creative and high-energy professionals who are up to the challenge of taking the lead in the changing Internet landscape.”</p>
<p>The Dublin operation will be led by the newly hired David Ryan from Electronic Arts. </p>
<p>“With his experience creating efficiencies inside of large operations, identifying and participating in high-growth markets, and creating value within smaller start up environments, David Ryan is certain to lead our Demand Media Dublin team to success in a new market,” continued Panos. “Our ramped up efforts internationally further illustrate Demand Media’s commitment to this historic TLD launch.”</p>
<p>Ryan served as senior director at EA. </p>
<p>In other news, Demand Media announced on Tuesday that it has <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-expands-further-into-paid-content-with-creativebug-2013-03">acquired e-learning content site Creativebug</a>, which it says will <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-etsy-and-pinterest-will-feed-interest-in-creativebug-2013-03">cater to the Etsy and Pinterest crowds</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-announces-domain-business-hq-in-dublin-2013-03/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Cutts Talks Location And ccTLDs</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/matt-cutts-talks-location-and-cctlds-2013-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/matt-cutts-talks-location-and-cctlds-2013-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cctlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webmaster Help Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=219342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Google&#8217;s latest Webmaster Help video, Matt Cutts discusses location and ccTLDs. Specifically, he responds to the following user-submitted question: We have a vanity domain (http://ran.ge) that unfortunately isn&#8217;t one of the generic TLDs, which means we can&#8217;t set our &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Google&#8217;s latest Webmaster Help video, Matt Cutts discusses location and ccTLDs. Specifically, he responds to the following user-submitted question: </p>
<p><em>We have a vanity domain (http://ran.ge) that unfortunately isn&#8217;t one of the generic TLDs, which means we can&#8217;t set our geographic target in Webmaster Tools. Is there any way to still target our proper location? </em></p>
<p><center><iframe width="616" height="347" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QCozweHGTk0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve seen this trend &#8211; as the domain name space gets a little more exhausted in .com, people get creative, and so Matt Mullenweg at WordPress grabbed ma.tt, for example, which is a really creative URL, but something that people don&#8217;t think about is: what is .tt? Or what is .ge?&#8221; says Cutts. &#8220;It&#8217;s Georgia, you know, there&#8217;s a lot of startups that have been using .io, which is the TLD for the Indian Ocean, I believe. So you have to think hard about is it the case that this is going to be known as an international area? If your&#8217;e just using .es because you can find some cool word that ends in .es, most people using that domain are targeting Spain. So that is our assumption &#8211; that you&#8217;re targeting Spain.&#8221;</p>
<p>He says that some people want .li to be associated with Long Island, but it&#8217;s really associated with Lichtenstein, and that&#8217;s how Google views it. </p>
<p>&#8220;In some sense, it comes down to a little bit of a call about when a domain becomes truly generic. When it becomes appropriate for the entire world. So .co, which used to be, I think, Columbia, might be more generic now, where everybody&#8217;s using it as if it is another .com, but some domains, I would put some thought into. Just because it&#8217;s a cool URL, a lot of the times we&#8217;re going to be looking at it and thinking, &#8216;Hmm, this is actually related more to Lichtenstein that it is to Long Island, and so even though people want to do a Long Island business, we&#8217;re more likely to think that it&#8217;s in Lichtenstein.&#8221;</p>
<p>He goes on to suggest that you post on Webmaster forums and &#8220;rally your case,&#8221; and do a blog post that says, &#8220;.iO is mostly startups, and this should not be related to this country&#8230;&#8221; Still, he says, Google has to look at the data and look at the domains that are in use, and make a judgment call. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/matt-cutts-talks-location-and-cctlds-2013-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demand Media To Split Into Two Public Companies, Earnings Released</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-to-split-into-two-public-companies-earnings-released-2013-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-to-split-into-two-public-companies-earnings-released-2013-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eNom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Rosenblatt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=217695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demand Media announced today that its board of directors has authorized a plan for the company to explore separating into two separate public companies &#8211; one for its media business and one for its domain business. CEO Richard Rosenblatt said, &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demand Media announced today that its board of directors has authorized a plan for the company to explore separating into two separate public companies &#8211; one for its media business and one for its domain business.</p>
<p>CEO Richard Rosenblatt said, “Both businesses have grown to become leaders in their respective markets, and we now want to provide additional operational and strategic flexibility to drive sustainable growth. We believe a separation will position each business to better pursue its specific strategic priorities and vision, as well as improve transparency for investors and enable the capital markets to better assess each company’s value, performance and potential.”</p>
<p>“We intend to appropriately capitalize both companies to pursue their distinct growth opportunities, such as the upcoming launch of new generic Top Level Domains that is a transformative event for our domain services business, as well as further diversifying our content offerings in our media business,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p>Demand Media expects a potential transaction to come within the next nine to twelve months. In the meantime, the company will work with outside advisers to develop plans for the the board&#8217;s further consideration and approval. </p>
<p>The company also just released its Q4 and Fiscal 2012 financial results.</p>
<p>On the earnings call, Rosenblatt said the company intends to increase its investment in its people, its content production, and its gTLD initiative.  On the content side of things, it will evolve its content production arm (Demand Studios), and expects to double its investment in content this year, further develop its algorithm, add additional quality improvements (like those that helped it achieve recovery from the Panda update), and expand production capabilities. </p>
<p>The company will also increase distribution by expanding its partner network, which doubled revenues in 2012. Rosenblatt says he expects its revenues to double again this year. </p>
<p>They&#8217;re also planning on launching eHow in two more countries this year (after launching in Germany in Q4). </p>
<p>Rosenblatt says they&#8217;ll diversify into new content models, and will expand beyond their core ad-driven model with new paid opportunities including subscription video and elearning content. </p>
<p>On the gTLD front, he noted that Amazon and Google were the biggest players, and that their participation will lead to a bigger market for everyone. </p>
<p>Demand Media ranked as a top 20 US web property throughout last year, and was ranked at number 13 in January, according to comScore. The company reached over 125 million unique visitors worldwide in January, and eHow (which was once famously hit by Google&#8217;s Panda update) was ranked number 12 in the U.S. with 62 million unique visitors in January. </p>
<p>&#8220;We finished the year on a high note, posting record fourth quarter results and completing our fifth consecutive year of record revenue and Adjusted EBITDA,&#8221; said Rosenblatt. &#8220;We improved content quality and diversified our distribution channels by successfully revamping our content platform in 2012, and are now prepared to significantly increase our content investments in 2013. In addition, we became a leader in the generic Top Level Domain opportunity, due to substantial investments we made in 2012. We plan to increase this investment ahead of the expected launch later this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;As a result of these two different growth opportunities, we also announced today that our Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of our business into two independent publicly-traded companies via a tax-free spin-off,&#8221; he added. &#8220;If approved, the separation will facilitate better operational and strategic flexibility, enabling each business to focus on its distinct priorities and growth opportunities.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s the earnings release in its entirety:</strong></p>
<p><em>SANTA MONICA, Calif.&#8211;(BUSINESS WIRE)&#8211;Feb. 19, 2013&#8211; <a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.demandmedia.com&amp;esheet=50566796&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=Demand+Media%2C+Inc.&amp;index=1&amp;md5=6627c5b67fb2212245bb71a99d07bd59">Demand Media, Inc.</a> (NYSE: DMD), a leading digital media and domain services company, today reported financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.</p>
<p>&#8220;We finished the year on a high note, posting record fourth quarter results and completing our fifth consecutive year of record revenue and Adjusted EBITDA,&#8221; saidRichard Rosenblatt, Chairman and CEO of Demand Media. &#8220;We improved content quality and diversified our distribution channels by successfully revamping our content platform in 2012, and are now prepared to significantly increase our content investments in 2013. In addition, we became a leader in the generic Top Level Domain opportunity, due to substantial investments we made in 2012. We plan to increase this investment ahead of the expected launch later this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rosenblatt added: &#8220;As a result of these two different growth opportunities, we also announced today that our Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of our business into two independent publicly-traded companies via a tax-free spin-off. If approved, the separation will facilitate better operational and strategic flexibility, enabling each business to focus on its distinct priorities and growth opportunities.&#8221;</p>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="27"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="27"><strong>Financial Summary</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="27"><strong>In millions, except per share amounts</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="11"><strong>Three months ended</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="11"><strong>Year ended</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="11"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="11"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Change</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>84.4</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>103.1</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>22%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>324.9</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>380.6</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Content &amp; Media Revenue ex-TAC<sup>(1)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>49.9</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>62.3</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>25%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>193.0</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>227.0</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Registrar Revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">31.4</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">34.5</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>10%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">119.4</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">134.2</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Revenue ex-TAC<sup>(1)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>81.3</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>96.8</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>19%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>312.4</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>361.1</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Income (loss) from Operations</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(4.8</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6.1</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>NA</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(13.1</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>8.7</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adjusted EBITDA<sup>(1)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>23.7</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>29.4</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>24%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>86.0</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>103.4</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net income (loss)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(6.4</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>4.7</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>NA</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(18.5</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6.2</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adjusted net income<sup>(1)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>10.8</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>60%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>21.9</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>34.3</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EPS &#8211; diluted</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(0.08</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.05</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>NA</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(0.27</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.07</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adjusted EPS<sup>(1)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.08</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.12</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>50%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.25</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.39</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash Flow from Operations</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>27.2</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>26.0</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>(4)%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>85.3</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>91.0</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Free Cash Flow<sup>(1)(2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>18.3</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>17.1</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>(7)%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>19.5</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>62.3</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>219%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="27">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(1)</td>
<td></td>
<td>These non-GAAP financial measures are described below and reconciled to their comparable GAAP measures in the accompanying tables. Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Reconciliations for both measures are available on the investor relations section of the Company&#8217;s website.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(2)</td>
<td></td>
<td>In 2012, the Company invested $18.2 million in generic Top Level Domain (&#8220;gTLD&#8221;) applications, which did not impact its recurring Free Cash Flow metric.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Q4 2012 Financial Summary:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Content &amp; Media revenue ex-TAC grew 25% year-over-year, driven by 24% page view growth on the Company&#8217;s owned &amp; operated properties as well as 37% growth in network RPMs ex-TAC, reflecting higher revenue from network content partners.</li>
<li>Registrar revenue grew 10% year-over-year, driven by an increase in the number of domains on our platform, due primarily to growth from new partners.</li>
<li>Adjusted EBITDA increased 24% year-over-year, resulting in 110 basis points of margin expansion to 30.3% of Revenue ex-TAC. This improvement was driven by the growth in higher margin Content &amp; Media revenue and operating leverage.</li>
</ul>
<p>“In 2012 we generated over $60 million of free cash flow, which more than funded our acquisition of Name.com and the repurchase of nearly $9 million of our common stock,” said Demand Media&#8217;s CFO Mel Tang. &#8220;We plan to continue reinvesting our strong cash flows into long-term growth opportunities, such as our gTLD initiative as well as growing and diversifying our content offerings.”</p>
<p><strong>Business Highlights:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Demand Media ranked as a top 20 US web property<sup> </sup>throughout 2012, and ranked #13 in January 2013.<sup>(1)</sup></li>
<li>Demand Media reached more than 125 million unique visitors worldwide in January 2013.<sup>(1)</sup></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ehow.com%2F&amp;esheet=50566796&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=eHow.com&amp;index=2&amp;md5=e2bbc593235eb59c985b3b77b2861d8a">eHow.com</a> ranked as the #12 website in the US, with 62.0 million unique users inJanuary 2013.<sup>(1)</sup></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.livestrong.com&amp;esheet=50566796&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=LIVESTRONG.COM&amp;index=3&amp;md5=224ac31993fe1f03fa051d0a6d218232">LIVESTRONG.COM</a>/eHow Health ranked as the #3 Health property in the US inJanuary 2013.<sup>(1)</sup></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cracked.com&amp;esheet=50566796&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=Cracked&amp;index=4&amp;md5=eac438e0ce9b774f8dec82314d029056">Cracked</a> ranked as the #1 Humor property in the US in January 2013.<sup>(1)</sup></li>
<li>On December 31, 2012, Demand Media acquired retail registrar <a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.name.com&amp;esheet=50566796&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=Name.com&amp;index=5&amp;md5=9f325a75ed42286a04ad373c64324c78">Name.com</a>, expanding its registrar platform as it prepares for the historic release of new gTLDs.</li>
<li>During the fourth quarter of 2012, Demand Media repurchased approximately 572,000 shares of common stock for $4.9 million under its Board-authorized $50.0 million share repurchase program. To date, the Company has repurchased approximately 4.0 million shares of common stock for $30.8 million.</li>
<li>On February 19, 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of its business into two distinct publicly traded companies.</li>
</ul>
<p><sup>(1)</sup> Source: comScore.</p>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Operating Metrics:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"><strong>Three months ended</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"><strong>Year ended</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="12"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Change</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Content &amp; Media Metrics:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>Owned and operated</em></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Page views<sup>(1)</sup> (in millions)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,696</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">3,354</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>24</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">10,378</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">13,192</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>27</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RPM<sup>(2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>14.53</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>14.55</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>15.14</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>13.53</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>(11</td>
<td>)%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>Network of customer websites</em></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Page views<sup>(1)</sup>(in millions)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">4,935</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">4,530</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>(8</td>
<td>)%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">17,436</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">18,989</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>9</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RPM<sup>(2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>2.81</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>4.38</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>56</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>2.77</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>3.58</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>29</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RPM ex-TAC<sup>(3)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>2.18</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>2.98</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>37</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>2.55</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>24</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Registrar Metrics:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>End of Period # of Domains<sup>(4)</sup> (in millions)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">12.7</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">13.7</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>8</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">12.7</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">13.7</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>8</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average Revenue per Domain<sup>(5)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>10.08</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>10.09</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>10.08</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>10.19</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>1</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>____________________</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><sup>(1)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td>Page views represent the total number of web pages viewed across (a) our owned and operated websites and/or (b) our network of customer websites, to the extent that the viewed customer web pages host the Company&#8217;s monetization, social media and/or content services.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><sup>(2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td>RPM is defined as Content &amp; Media revenue per one thousand page views.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><sup>(3)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td>RPM ex-TAC is defined as Content &amp; Media Revenue ex-TAC per one thousand page views.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><sup>(4)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td>Domain is defined as an individual domain name paid for by a third-party customer where the domain name is managed through our Registrar service offering.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><sup>(5)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td>Average revenue per domain is calculated by dividing Registrar revenue for a period by the average number of domains registered in that period. Average revenue per domain for partial year periods is annualized.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Beginning July 1, 2011, the number of net new domains has been adjusted to include only new registered domains added to our platform for which the Company has recognized revenue. Excluding the impact of this change, average revenue per domain during the three months and year ended December 31, 2012 would have increased 1% and decreased 4%, respectively, compared to the corresponding prior-year periods.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Q4 2012 Operating Metrics:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Owned &amp; Operated page views increased 24% year-over-year, driven primarily by strong traffic growth on eHow.com and LIVESTRONG.COM. Owned &amp; Operated RPMs were relatively flat year-over-year.</li>
<li>Network page views decreased 8% year-over-year to 4.5 billion, due primarily to lower traffic from our social media partners. Network RPM ex-TAC increased 37% year-over-year, reflecting higher revenue from our growing network of content partners, primarily YouTube.</li>
<li>End of period domains increased 8% year-over-year to 13.7 million, driven primarily by the addition of higher volume customers and continued growth from existing resellers, with average revenue per domain flat year-over-year.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Business Outlook</strong></p>
<p><em>The following forward-looking information includes certain projections made by management as of the date of this press release. The Company does not intend to revise or update this information, except as required by law, and may not provide this type of information in the future. Due to a variety of factors, actual results may differ significantly from those projected.</em> <em>The factors that may affect results include, without limitation, the factors referenced later in this announcement under the caption “Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” These and other factors are discussed in more detail in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.</em></p>
<p>Excluding $5 to $10 million of estimated expenses in 2013 associated with the formation of the Company&#8217;s gTLD initiative, the Company&#8217;s guidance for the first quarter endingMarch 31, 2013 and fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 is as follows:</p>
<p><strong>First Quarter 2013</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Revenue in the range of $100.0 &#8211; $102.0 million</li>
<li>Revenue ex-TAC in the range of $94.0 &#8211; $96.0 million</li>
<li>Adjusted EBITDA in the range of $23.5 &#8211; $25.5 million</li>
<li>Adjusted EPS in the range of $0.07 &#8211; $0.08 per share</li>
<li>Weighted average diluted shares 89.0 &#8211; 90.0 million</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Year 2013</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Revenue in the range of $435.0 &#8211; $443.0 million</li>
<li>Revenue ex-TAC in the range of $410.0 &#8211; $418.0 million</li>
<li>Adjusted EBITDA in the range of $110.0 &#8211; $115.0 million</li>
<li>Adjusted EPS in the range of $0.39 &#8211; $0.43 per share</li>
<li>Weighted average diluted shares 89.0 &#8211; 91.0 million</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conference Call and Webcast Information</strong></p>
<p>Demand Media will host a corresponding conference call and live webcast at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time today. To access the conference call, dial 877.565.1268<strong> </strong>(for domestic participants) or 937.999.3108<strong> </strong>(for international participants). The conference ID is 90583374. To participate on the live call, analysts should dial-in at least 10 minutes prior to the commencement of the call. A live webcast also will be available on the Investor Relations section of the Company&#8217;s corporate website at <a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fir.demandmedia.com&amp;esheet=50566796&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=http%3A%2F%2Fir.demandmedia.com&amp;index=6&amp;md5=de48139670acba09701aa238b20b2b38">http://ir.demandmedia.com</a> and via replay beginning approximately two hours after the completion of the call.</p>
<p><strong>About Non-GAAP Financial Measures</strong></p>
<p>To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we use certain non-GAAP financial measures described below. The presentation of this additional financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the tables captioned “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations” included at the end of this release.</p>
<p>Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA. While the dollar value of each measure is the same, a comparison of the historical reconciliation of both measures is provided in our supplemental financial schedules posted on the investor relations section of our corporate website at<a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fir.demandmedia.com&amp;esheet=50566796&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=http%3A%2F%2Fir.demandmedia.com&amp;index=7&amp;md5=9cfede4588c64ebdaa914ea8548c87c7">http://ir.demandmedia.com</a>. The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this release are the primary measures used by the Company&#8217;s management and board of directors to understand and evaluate its financial performance and operating trends, including period to period comparisons, to prepare and approve its annual budget and to develop short and long term operational plans. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is the primary measure used by the compensation committee of the Company&#8217;s board of directors to establish the funding targets for and fund its annual bonus pool for the Company&#8217;s employees and executives. We believe our presented non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) management frequently uses them in its discussions with investors, commercial bankers, securities analysts and other users of its financial statements.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue ex-TAC </strong>is defined by the Company as GAAP revenue less traffic acquisition costs (TAC). TAC comprises the portion of Content &amp; Media GAAP revenue shared with the Company&#8217;s network customers. Management believes that Revenue ex-TAC is a meaningful measure of operating performance because it is frequently used for internal managerial purposes and helps facilitate a more complete period-to-period understanding of factors and trends affecting the Company&#8217;s underlying revenue performance of its Content &amp; Media service offering.</p>
<p><strong>Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted EBITDA) </strong>is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before income tax expense, other income (expense), interest expense (income), depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, as well as the financial impact of acquisition and realignment costs, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, and any gains or losses on certain asset sales or dispositions. Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these expenses to be indicative of the Company&#8217;s ongoing operating results or future outlook.</p>
<p>Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures reflect the Company&#8217;s business in a manner that allows for meaningful period to period comparisons and analysis of trends. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period to period comparisons of the Company&#8217;s underlying recurring revenue and operating costs, which is focused more closely on the current costs necessary to utilize previously acquired long-lived assets. In addition, management believes that it can be useful to exclude certain non-cash charges because the amount of such expenses is the result of long-term investment decisions in previous periods rather than day-to-day operating decisions. For example, due to the long-lived nature of a majority of its media content, the revenue generated by the Company&#8217;s media content assets in a given period bears little relationship to the amount of its investment in media content in that same period. Accordingly, management believes that content acquisition costs represent a discretionary long-term capital investment decision undertaken at a point in time. This investment decision is clearly distinguishable from other ongoing business activities, and its discretionary nature and long-term impact differentiate it from specific period transactions, decisions regarding day-to-day operations, and activities that would have an immediate impact on operating or financial performance if materially changed, deferred or terminated.</p>
<p><strong>Adjusted Earnings Per Share </strong>is defined by the Company as Adjusted Net Income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. <strong>Adjusted Net Income </strong>is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before the effect of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets acquired via business combinations, accelerated amortization of intangible assets removed from service, acquisition and realignment costs, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, and any gains or losses on certain asset sales or dispositions, and is calculated using the application of a normalized effective tax rate. Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these expenses to be indicative of the Company&#8217;s ongoing operating results or future outlook.</p>
<p>Management believes that Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share provide investors with additional useful information to measure the Company&#8217;s underlying financial performance, particularly from period to period, because these measures are exclusive of certain non-cash expenses not directly related to the operation of its ongoing business (such as amortization of intangible assets acquired via business combinations, as well as certain other non-cash expenses such as purchase accounting adjustments and stock-based compensation) and include a normalized effective tax rate based on the Company&#8217;s statutory tax rate.</p>
<p><strong>Discretionary Free Cash Flow </strong>is defined by the Company as net cash provided by operating activities excluding cash outflows from acquisition and realignment activities, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, and expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, less capital expenditures to acquire property and equipment.<strong> Free Cash Flow </strong>is defined by the Company as <strong>Discretionary Free Cash Flow </strong>less investments in intangible assets and is not impacted by gTLD application payments, which were $18.2 million in 2012. Management believes that Discretionary Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow provide investors with additional useful information to measure operating liquidity because they reflect the Company&#8217;s underlying cash flows from recurring operating activities after investing in capital assets and intangible assets. These measures are used by management, and may also be useful for investors, to assess the Company&#8217;s ability to generate cash flow for a variety of strategic opportunities, including reinvestment in the business, pursuing new business opportunities, potential acquisitions, payment of dividends and share repurchases.</p>
<p>The use of these non-GAAP financial measures has certain limitations because they do not reflect all items of income and expense, or cash flows that affect the Company&#8217;s operations. An additional limitation of these non-GAAP financial measures is that they do not have standardized meanings, and therefore other companies may use the same or similarly named measures but exclude different items or use different computations. Management compensates for these limitations by reconciling these non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures within its financial press releases. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Further, these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the non-GAAP financial information used by other companies, including peer companies, and therefore comparability may be limited. We encourage investors and others to review our financial information in its entirety and not rely on a single financial measure. The accompanying tables have more details on the GAAP financial measures and the related reconciliations.</p>
<p><strong>About Demand Media</strong></p>
<p>Demand Media, Inc. (NYSE: DMD) is a leading digital media and domain services company that informs and entertains one of the internet&#8217;s largest audiences, helps advertisers find innovative ways to engage with their customers and enables publishers, individuals and businesses to expand their online presence. Headquartered in Santa Monica, CA, Demand Media has offices in North America, South America and Europe. For more information about Demand Media, please visit <a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.demandmedia.com&amp;esheet=50566796&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=www.demandmedia.com&amp;index=8&amp;md5=5eb0e4f8b9473bfd68481fab951d3339">www.demandmedia.com</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements</strong></p>
<p><em>This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties regarding the Company&#8217;s future financial performance, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, financial condition, operating performance and results of operations, including certain assumptions related thereto. Statements containing words such as guidance, may, believe, anticipate, expect, intend, plan, project, projections, business outlook, and estimate or similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered an indication of future performance. Potential risks and uncertainties include, among others: our ability to complete a separation of our business as announced herein and unanticipated developments that may delay or negatively impact such a transaction; the possibility that we may decide not to proceed with the separation of our business as announced herein if we determine that alternative opportunities are more favorable to our stockholders; the possibility that we decide to separate our business in a manner different from that disclosed herein; the impact and possible disruption to our operations from pursuing such a separation transaction announced herein; our ability to retain key personnel; the high costs we will likely incur in connection with such a transaction, which we would not be able to recoup if such a transaction is not consummated; the expectation that the transaction announced herein will be tax-free; revenue and growth expectations for the two independent companies following the separation of our business;</em> <em>the ability of each business to operate as an independent entity upon completion of such a transaction; changes in the methodologies of internet search engines, including ongoing algorithmic changes made by Google as well as possible future changes, and the impact such changes may have on page view growth and driving search related traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; changes in our content creation and distribution platform, including the possible repurposing of content to alternate distribution channels, reduced investments in intangible assets or the sale or removal of content; our ability to successfully launch, produce and monetize new content formats; the inherent challenges of estimating the overall impact on page views and search driven traffic to our owned and operated websites based on the data available to us as internet search engines continue to make adjustments to their search algorithms; our ability to compete with new or existing competitors; our ability to maintain or increase our advertising revenue; our ability to continue to drive and grow traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; our ability to effectively monetize our portfolio of content; our dependence on material agreements with a specific business partner for a significant portion of our revenue; future internal rates of return on content investment and our decision to invest in different types of content in the future, including premium video and other formats of text content; our ability to attract and retain freelance creative professionals; changes in our level of investment in media content intangibles; the effects of changes or shifts in internet marketing expenditures, including from text to video content as well as from desktop to mobile content; the effects of shifting consumption of media content from desktop to mobile; the effects of seasonality on traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; our ability to continue to add partners to our registrar platform on competitive terms; our ability to successfully pursue and implement our gTLD initiative; changes in stock-based compensation; changes in amortization or depreciation expense due to a variety of factors; potential write downs, reserves against or impairment of assets including receivables, goodwill, intangibles (including media content) or other assets; changes in tax laws, our business or other factors that would impact anticipated tax benefits or expenses; our ability to successfully identify, consummate and integrate acquisitions; our ability to retain key customers and key personnel; risks associated with litigation; the impact of governmental regulation; and the effects of discontinuing or discontinued business operations. From time to time, we may consider acquisitions or divestitures that, if consummated, could be material. Any forward-looking statements regarding financial metrics are based upon the assumption that no such acquisition or divestiture is consummated during the relevant periods. If an acquisition or divestiture were consummated, actual results could differ materially from any forward-looking statements. More information about potential risk factors that could affect our operating and financial results are contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endingDecember 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(</em><em><a href="http://www.sec.gov/">http://www.sec.gov</a></em><em>) on February 24, 2012, and as such risk factors may be updated in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, information under the captions Risk Factors and Management&#8217;s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.</em></p>
<p><em>Furthermore, as discussed above, the Company does not intend to revise or update the information set forth in this press release, except as required by law, and may not provide this type of information in the future.</em></p>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="21"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21"><strong>Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">(In thousands, except per share amounts)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Three months ended</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Year ended</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>84,415</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>103,142</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>324,866</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>380,578</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Operating expenses</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Service costs (exclusive of amortization of intangible assets shown separately below) <sup>(1) (2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">40,198</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">48,865</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">155,830</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">181,018</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sales and marketing <sup>(1) (2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">9,325</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">12,823</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">37,394</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">46,501</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Product development <sup>(1) (2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">9,462</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">9,719</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">38,146</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">40,708</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>General and administrative <sup>(1) (2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">13,803</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">16,171</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">59,451</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">63,025</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amortization of intangible assets</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">16,393</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">9,460</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">47,174</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">40,676</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total operating expenses</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">89,181</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">97,038</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">337,995</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">371,928</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Income (loss) from operations</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(4,766</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">6,104</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(13,129</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">8,650</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other income (expense)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Interest income</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">4</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">8</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">56</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">42</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Interest expense</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(151</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(157</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(861</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(622</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other income (expense), net</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(75</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(34</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(413</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(111</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total other expense</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(222</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(183</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(1,218</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(691</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Income (loss) before income taxes</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(4,988</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">5,921</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(14,347</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">7,959</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Income tax expense</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(1,438</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(1,172</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(4,177</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(1,783</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net (loss) income</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(6,426</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>4,749</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(18,524</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6,176</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><sup>(1)</sup> Stock-based compensation expense included in the line items above:</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Service costs</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>711</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>679</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>2,052</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>2,820</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sales and marketing</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,416</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,597</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">4,857</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">6,118</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Product development</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,364</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,283</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">5,013</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">6,452</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>General and administrative</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">3,263</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">3,823</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">16,934</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">15,978</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total stock-based compensation expense</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6,754</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>7,382</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>28,856</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>31,368</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><sup>(2)</sup> Depreciation included in the line items above:</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Service costs</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>3,770</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>3,663</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>16,075</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>14,452</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sales and marketing</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">127</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">108</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">423</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">453</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Product development</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">308</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">238</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,466</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,025</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>General and administrative</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">861</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,025</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,994</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">3,728</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total depreciation</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>5,066</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>5,034</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>20,958</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>19,658</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Income (loss) per common share:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net income (loss)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(6,426</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>4,749</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(18,524</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6,176</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cumulative preferred stock dividends <sup>(3)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(2,477</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(6,426</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>4,749</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(21,001</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6,176</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net income (loss) per share &#8211; basic</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(0.08</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">0.06</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(0.27</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">0.07</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net income (loss) per share &#8211; diluted</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(0.08</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">0.05</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(0.27</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">0.07</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weighted average number of shares &#8211; basic</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">83,592</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">86,140</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">78,646</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">84,553</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weighted average number of shares &#8211; diluted</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">83,592</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">88,444</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">78,646</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">87,237</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">____________________</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><sup>(3)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td>As a result of the Company’s initial public offering which was completed on January 31, 2011, all shares of the Company’s preferred stock were converted to common stock.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="11"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="11"><strong>Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="11">Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="11">(In thousands)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Current assets</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash and cash equivalents</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>86,035</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>102,933</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accounts receivable, net</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">32,665</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">45,517</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Prepaid expenses and other current assets</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">8,656</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">6,041</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deferred registration costs</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">50,636</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">57,718</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total current assets</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">177,992</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">212,209</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Property and equipment, net</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">32,626</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">35,467</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Intangible assets, net</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">111,304</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">91,061</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Goodwill</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">256,060</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">267,034</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deferred registration costs</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">9,555</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">11,320</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other long-term assets</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,566</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">20,906</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total assets</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>590,103</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>637,997</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Current liabilities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accounts payable</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>10,046</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>10,471</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accrued expenses and other current liabilities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">33,932</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">40,489</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deferred tax liabilities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">18,288</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">18,892</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deferred revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">71,109</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">75,142</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total current liabilities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">133,375</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">144,994</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deferred revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">14,802</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">15,965</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other liabilities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,660</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">4,847</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total liabilities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">149,837</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">165,806</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stockholders’ equity (deficit)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Common stock and additional paid-in capital</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">528,042</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">562,703</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Treasury stock</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(17,064</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(25,932</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accumulated other comprehensive income</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">59</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">15</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accumulated deficit</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(70,771</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(64,595</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">440,266</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">472,191</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>590,103</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>637,997</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="21"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21"><strong>Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">(In thousands)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Three months ended</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Year ended</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cash flows from operating activities:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net income (loss)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(6,426</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>4,749</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(18,524</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6,176</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Depreciation and amortization</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">21,459</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">14,494</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">68,132</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">60,334</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stock-based compensation</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">6,741</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">7,382</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">28,730</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">31,368</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,128</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,134</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">3,491</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,717</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">4,322</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(1,722</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">3,520</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(8,612</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net cash provided by operating activities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">27,224</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">26,037</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">85,349</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">90,983</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cash flows from investing activities:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Purchases of property and equipment</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(4,222</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(5,283</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(18,246</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(17,708</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Purchases of intangibles</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(5,294</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(4,647</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(49,283</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(13,237</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Payments for gTLD applications</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(18,202</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash paid for acquisitions</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(38</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(16,200</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(31,010</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(17,480</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(855</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net cash used in investing activities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(9,554</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(26,130</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(98,539</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(67,482</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cash flows from financing activities:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(145</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">78,480</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Repurchases of common stock</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(13,336</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(4,913</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(17,064</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(8,869</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Proceeds from exercises of stock options and contributions to ESPP</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">3,242</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,451</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">7,599</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">12,467</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net taxes paid on RSUs vesting and options exercised</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(364</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(6,151</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(725</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(9,496</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(168</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(258</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(1,354</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(668</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(10,771</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(9,871</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">66,936</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(6,566</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Effect of foreign currency on cash and cash equivalents</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(18</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(19</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(49</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(37</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Change in cash and cash equivalents</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">6,881</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(9,983</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">53,697</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">16,898</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">79,154</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">112,916</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">32,338</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">86,035</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash and cash equivalents, end of period</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>86,035</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>102,933</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>86,035</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>102,933</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="21"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21"><strong>Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures to Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">(In thousands, except per share amounts)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Three months ended</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Year ended</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Revenue ex-TAC:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Content &amp; Media revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>53,032</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>68,633</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>205,450</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>246,399</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Less: traffic acquisition costs (TAC)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(3,111</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(6,332</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(12,495</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(19,441</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Content &amp; Media Revenue ex-TAC</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">49,921</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">62,301</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">192,955</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">226,958</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Registrar revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">31,383</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">34,509</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">119,416</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">134,179</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Revenue ex-TAC</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>81,304</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>96,810</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>312,371</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>361,137</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Adjusted EBITDA</strong><sup><strong>(1)</strong></sup><strong>:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net income (loss)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(6,426</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>4,749</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(18,524</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6,176</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Income tax expense</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,438</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,172</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">4,177</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,783</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Interest and other expense, net</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">222</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">183</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,218</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">691</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Depreciation and amortization<sup>(2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">21,459</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">14,494</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">68,132</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">60,334</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stock-based compensation</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">6,754</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">7,382</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">28,856</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">31,368</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Acquisition and realignment costs<sup>(3)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">271</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">314</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,099</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">446</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>gTLD expense<sup>(4)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,061</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,650</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adjusted EBITDA</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>23,718</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>29,355</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>85,958</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>103,448</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Discretionary and Total Free Cash Flow:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net cash provided by operating activities</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>27,224</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>26,037</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>85,349</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>90,983</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Purchases of property and equipment</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(4,222</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(5,283</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(18,246</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(17,708</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Acquisition and realignment cash flows</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">602</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">25</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,670</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">25</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>gTLD expense cash flows<sup>(4)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">974</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,198</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Discretionary Free Cash Flow</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">23,604</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">21,753</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">68,773</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">75,498</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Purchases of intangible assets</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(5,294</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(4,647</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(49,283</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(13,237</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Free Cash Flow<sup>(4)(5)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>18,310</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>17,106</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>19,490</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>62,261</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Adjusted Net Income:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GAAP net income (loss)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(6,426</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>4,749</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>(18,524</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6,176</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(a) Stock-based compensation</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">6,754</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">7,382</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">28,856</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">31,368</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(b) Amortization of intangible assets &#8211; M&amp;A</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,974</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,572</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">12,773</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">10,904</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(c) Content intangible assets removed from service<sup>(2)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">5,898</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">237</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">5,898</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,055</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(d) Acquisition and realignment costs<sup>(3)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">271</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">314</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,099</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">446</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(e) gTLD expense<sup>(4)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">1,061</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">—</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">2,650</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(f) Income tax effect of items (a) &#8211; (e) &amp; application of 38% statutory tax rate to pre-tax income</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(2,707</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(5,473</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(9,229</td>
<td>)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">(19,262</td>
<td>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adjusted Net Income</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>6,764</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>10,842</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>21,873</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>34,337</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share &#8211; diluted</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.08</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.12</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.25</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>0.39</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shares used to calculate non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share – diluted<sup>(6)</sup></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">86,758</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">88,444</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">88,541</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">87,237</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">___________________</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>(1)</td>
<td></td>
<td>Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA. While the dollar value of each measure does not differ, a comparison of the historical reconciliation of both measures is provided in our supplemental financial schedules available on the investor relations section of our corporate website.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(2)</td>
<td></td>
<td>In conjunction with its previously announced plans to improve its content creation and distribution platform, the Company elected to remove certain content assets from service, resulting in accelerated amortization expense of $5.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, and $1.8 million and $0.2 million in the first and fourth quarter of 2012, respectively.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(3)</td>
<td></td>
<td>Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these costs to be indicative of the Company&#8217;s core operating results.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(4)</td>
<td></td>
<td>Comprises formation expenses directly related to the Company&#8217;s gTLD initiative that did not generate associated revenue in 2012.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(5)</td>
<td></td>
<td>In 2012, the Company invested $18.2 million in gTLD applications, which did not impact its recurring Free Cash Flow metric.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(6)</td>
<td></td>
<td>Shares used to calculate non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share &#8211; diluted include the weighted average common stock for the periods presented and all dilutive common stock equivalents at each period. Amounts have been adjusted in 2011 to reflect the revised capital structure following the Company&#8217;s initial public offering which was completed on January 31, 2011, whereby the Company issued 5,175 shares of common stock and converted certain warrants and all of its previously outstanding convertible preferred stock into 62,155 shares of common stock as if those transactions were consummated on January 1, 2011.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="21"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21"><strong>Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">Unaudited GAAP Revenue, by Revenue Source</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="21">(In thousands)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Three months ended</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Year ended</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Content &amp; Media:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Owned and operated websites</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>39,172</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>48,796</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>157,089</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>178,511</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Network of customer websites</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">13,860</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">19,837</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">48,361</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">67,888</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Revenue – Content &amp; Media</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">53,032</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">68,633</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">205,450</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">246,399</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Registrar</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">31,383</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">34,509</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">119,416</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">134,179</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>84,415</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>103,142</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>324,866</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$</td>
<td>380,578</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="7"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="7"><strong>Three months ended</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>Year ended</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="7"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="8"><strong>December 31,</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"><strong>2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Content &amp; Media:</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Owned and operated websites</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">46</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">47</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">48</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">47</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Network of customer websites</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">16</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">19</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">15</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">18</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Revenue – Content &amp; Media</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">63</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">67</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">63</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">65</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Registrar</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">37</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">33</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">37</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">35</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">100</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">100</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">100</td>
<td>%</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2">100</td>
<td>%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img src="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=bwnews&amp;sty=20130219007014r1&amp;sid=acqr4&amp;distro=nx" alt="" /></p>
<p>Source: Demand Media, Inc.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-media-to-split-into-two-public-companies-earnings-released-2013-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Factors To Consider When Choosing A Domain Name</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/seo-factors-to-consider-when-choosing-a-domain-name-2013-02</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/seo-factors-to-consider-when-choosing-a-domain-name-2013-02#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ainsworth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=216408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The old saying “a stitch in time saves nine” couldn’t be more applicable than when it comes to launching a new website. It pays to take the time “make your list and check it twice.” Making the right choices before &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old saying “a stitch in time saves nine” couldn’t be more applicable than when it comes to launching a new website. It pays to take the time “make your list and check it twice.” Making the right choices before you launch a website can save a lot of time later.</p>
<p>Obviously, one of the of the most important decisions you’ll need to make when launching a new site is your domain. Since <a href="http://econsultancy.com/us/reports/habits-and-motivations-of-consumers">about ⅔ of consumers use search engines to help make buying decisions</a>, search engine traffic is critical to the success or failure of most websites. This results in SEO being a common decision-making factor for choosing a domain.</p>
<h3>How will my domain name impact SEO?</h3>
<p>There are two primary ways your domain will impact your future SEO efforts and search rankings:</p>
<ul>
<li>Keywords</li>
<li>  Branding</li>
</ul>
<p>Let’s examine each of these in more detail.</p>
<h3>Keywords</h3>
<p>Historically, many SEOs chose domain names that included their target keyword phrases. For example, if you wanted to rank for the keyword green widgets, you might use a domain such as greenwidgets.net (exact match domain or EMD) or greenwidgetsshop.com (phrase match domain or PMD). The presence of the keyword phrase in the domain made it easier to gain a high ranking for that keyword phrase.</p>
<p>With the introduction of recent algorithms such as the Penguin update and the Exact Match Domain (EMD) update, Google has changed how they view domains that include keywords. Is it still worthwhile to choose a domain that includes your target keyword phrase? Let’s look at the data.</p>
<p><u><strong>Should you choose a domain name with your keywords in it?</strong></u></p>
<p>Our recent <a href=http://www.highposition.com/blog/googles-emd-update-the-numbers/">Google&#8217;s EMD Update study</a> found that after the Google EMD Update:</p>
<ul>
<li>Average EMD site ranking decreased from #13.4 to #26.6</li>
<li>Average PMD site ranking decreased from #39.7 to #47.7</li>
</ul>
<p>Dr Pete also has some excellent data on EMDs in his article <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/are-exact-match-domains-in-decline">Are Exact-Match Domains (EMDs) in Decline?</a></p>
<p>From this data, we can draw the conclusion that EMDs (and PMDs) no longer provide the same ranking boost that they used to. However, EMDs can, and in many cases do, still rank well. Our advice regarding keywords in your domain is:</p>
<ul>
<li> If you already own an EMD or PMD, you don’t necessarily need to get rid of it</li>
<li> If you’re buying a new domain, an EMD or PMD isn’t necessarily bad, but branding factors are more important</li>
<li> If you can buy a domain that includes one or more of your keywords <u>without sacrificing any branding considerations</u>, that may be a good choice</li>
</ul>
<h3>Branding</h3>
<p>It may interact with SEO in a less obvious way, but branding is actually the most important SEO consideration for purchasing a new domain. Your online brand (how people perceive and remember you) will directly impact your SEO efforts and results. Why? It’s simple:</p>
<ul>
<li> &#8220;Brands are the solution, not the problem. Brands are how you sort out the cesspool.&#8221; ~Google CEO Eric Schmidt</li>
<li>    Google likes brands, because users like brands. Which site would you rather read, link to, or share with your friends &#8211; NYtimes.com or your-ny-news-stuff.com ?</li>
</ul>
<p>See <a href="http://www.seobook.com/learn-seo/infographics/brand-branding-brands.php">The Rise of Brands in Google&#8217;s Relevancy Algorithms</a>.</p>
<p>A strong online brand means users are more likely to click on, read, share, and link to a website&#8230;all of which will help the site gain higher Google rankings.</p>
<p><u><strong>Choosing a domain as the foundation of your online brand</strong></u></p>
<p>The first step in building a strong online brand is choosing a good domain. Choose a domain that is:</p>
<ul>
<li>Memorable. You have no hope of building a brand if users can’t remember your name.</li>
<li>Unique. A generic sounding name, such as musicsite.com won’t have the same impact as a unique domain name.</li>
<li>Relevant. Some domains are industry-neutral, whereas others are clearly relevant to a specific industry (example: WebMD).</li>
<li>Not error-prone. For instance, a domain such as example.ws is a branding nightmare, because users will tend to type example.com instead. <a href="http://www.quora.com/Why-did-del-icio-us-change-its-domain-name-to-delicious-com">Delicious changed its domain name</a> because so many users got confused by their non-standard domain.</li>
<li>Short. Most well-known online brands are 1-2 words or less. <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/domain">SEOmoz suggests sticking to a domain of 15 characters or less</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Remember that your domain is just the start of building a brand &#8211; an essential step, but only the first step.</p>
<p><strong>Bonus Tip: Avoid Hyphens</strong></p>
<p>If mysite.com is taken, should you buy my-site.com? No. Here are 3 reasons to avoid hyphenated domains.</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.highposition.com/blog/hyphenated-domains-google/">Domains that include hyphens may be a negative SEO ranking factor.</a></li>
<li>Many users will type the domain without the hyphens and end up on a different site.</li>
<li>Hyphenated domains are often perceived as lower quality. </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/seo-factors-to-consider-when-choosing-a-domain-name-2013-02/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demand Media&#8217;s eNom Teams Up With Parallels On TLDs</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-medias-enom-teams-up-with-parallels-on-tlds-2013-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-medias-enom-teams-up-with-parallels-on-tlds-2013-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eNom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLDs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=213742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demand Media announced today that its domain registrar eNom&#8217;s Top Level Domain (TLD) program is included in the latest version of Parallels Plesk Panel and in Parallels Domain Name Network. “The Internet is undergoing an historic change, and our valuable &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demand Media announced today that its domain registrar eNom&#8217;s Top Level Domain (TLD) program  is included in the latest version of Parallels Plesk Panel and in Parallels Domain Name Network. </p>
<p>“The Internet is undergoing an historic change, and our valuable relationship with eNom enables us to provide solutions and information to educate customers who want to be on the forefront of this revolution,” said John Zanni, VP of marketing and alliances for Parallels.  “Access to the new TLD space will tremendously benefit our customers, and eNom makes this possible.”</p>
<p>Parallels customers will be able to participate in &#8220;all aspects of the initial phases&#8221; of the new TLD launch, the two companies say. That means during the &#8220;sunrise&#8221; and &#8220;landrush&#8221; periods. </p>
<p>“The excitement around new TLDs is growing, and our integration with Parallels helps validate this,” said Chris Sheridan, VP of business development for eNom.  “Through these integrations, we’re opening up the opportunity for a new group of businesses and consumers to become actively involved in the innovative new TLD market.  eNom’s session on new TLDs is aimed at educating attendees on this exciting time for the web.”</p>
<p>The services, called “eNom New TLD Extension for Parallels Plesk Panel”, will be available through the Server Management Extensions in the Service Provider interface or from the Parallels Partner Products site.</p>
<p>Sheridan will be speaking about the new TLDs program at Parallels Summit next week in Vegas. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/demand-medias-enom-teams-up-with-parallels-on-tlds-2013-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
