<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; BOTW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/botw/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:55:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rumor: Dmoz Selling To BOTW</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/rumor-dmoz-selling-to-botw-2008-09</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/rumor-dmoz-selling-to-botw-2008-09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Ord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMOZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=47044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy Schoemaker, of the popular <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com/">Shoemoney</a> blog, <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/09/13/botw-in-talks-to-take-over-dmoz-from-aol/">posted</a> that the owners of <a href="http://botw.org">Best of the Web Directory</a> are in talks to buy Dmoz from AOL and that a &#34;deal could be reached fairly soon.&#34;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy Schoemaker, of the popular <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com/">Shoemoney</a> blog, <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/09/13/botw-in-talks-to-take-over-dmoz-from-aol/">posted</a> that the owners of <a href="http://botw.org">Best of the Web Directory</a> are in talks to buy Dmoz from AOL and that a &quot;deal could be reached fairly soon.&quot;</p>
<p>It is unknown whether a sale would change Google&#8217;s use of <a href="http://www.dmoz.org/">Dmoz</a> for its own directory or would prompt Google to reconsider how much weight it gives the sites linked within Dmoz. For those who don&#8217;t know, Google is still relatively cozy with Dmoz in that it maintains a <a href="http://www.google.com/dirhp">Google Directory</a> that is a duplicate copy of the dmoz.org content. Dmoz also is still considered a great place for your site to be listed to gain premium Google link power that helps your PageRank.</p>
<p>Over the last year Google has made it clear they don&#8217;t like the selling of links from anywhere, especially directories. Google has also made clear that it considers the selling of inclusion in a directory tantamount to selling links. Many directories have experienced a severe lowering of their PageRank that have effectively made links (and inclusion) less valuable to potential buyers.</p>
<p>Since Dmoz is a free directory with moderators who decide whether a site is included or not, Google still gives their coveted Google juice to sites listed in Dmoz.&nbsp;</p>
<p>A listing in BOTW.org is not free. It charges a hefty $249.99 review fee which is a prerequisite for <a href="http://botw.org/helpcenter/submitcommercial.aspx">inclusion</a>. BOTW makes the point in bold font that their review for inclusion is not a guarantee of inclusion in their <a href="http://botw.org/helpcenter/submitterms.aspx">BOTW Submit Terms of Service</a>. Apparently Google believes there is enough editorial value in these reviews because BOTW.org still has good PageRank within its categories.</p>
<p>However, Google has penalized many other directories that charge for inclusion reviews. Many website owners feel that even the appearance of selling links leads to PageRank reduction. BOTW is an old, established directory with lots of quality listings similar to Yahoo, which also sells inclusion reviews and suffers no repercussions from Google either.</p>
<p><b>A few questions &#8230;</b></p>
<p>- If BOTW buys Dmoz, will it merge the directories and charge for inclusion reviews?</p>
<p>- Will Google continue to mirror the Dmoz results for its directory?</p>
<p>- Will any of this impact the Google juice your sites get from Dmoz?</p>
<p>One thing is certain, the concept of volunteer editors that Dmoz uses is flawed. BOTW and its paid editors may be exactly what Dmoz needs to turn its quality around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/rumor-dmoz-selling-to-botw-2008-09/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Directories Battle For #1 Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/web-directories-battle-for-1-spot-2008-04</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/web-directories-battle-for-1-spot-2008-04#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Janet Meiners</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMOZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Directory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=44942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Web directories, especially high quality ones, are coveted links for search engine marketers. The holy grail is a link on <a href="http://www.dmoz.org/" linkindex="84" set="yes">DMOZ</a>, but it&#8217;s pretty much unreachable. I know of someone who took great lengths to become an editor so he could get his site included. A few months later he resigned in frustration.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web directories, especially high quality ones, are coveted links for search engine marketers. The holy grail is a link on <a href="http://www.dmoz.org/" linkindex="84" set="yes">DMOZ</a>, but it&rsquo;s pretty much unreachable. I know of someone who took great lengths to become an editor so he could get his site included. A few months later he resigned in frustration.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMOZ" linkindex="85" set="yes">DMOZ</a> is known to be backlogged and highly political. You stand more chance of getting a link on Wikipedia. Now <a href="http://botw.org/" linkindex="86" set="yes">web directory Best of the Web (BOTW.org) </a>says they are going to compete with DMOZ, starting with <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/best-of-the-web-adds-dmoz-editors-to-directory-team/6666/" linkindex="87" set="yes">hiring over 30 of the directory&rsquo;s top editors</a>.</p>
<p>DMOZ boasts over 79,476 editors but the ones recruited for BOTW were part of the original team that started in the late 90s. BOTW was actually started before DMOZ &#8211; in 1994. The names of the new hires are well known in the directory industry. They even have a nickname &#8211; &ldquo;The Nerd Herd.&rdquo; They&rsquo;re tasked with improving the site and adding new sites and blogs.</p>
<p>Directories are edited by people who look for quality sites and list them by topic. They&rsquo;re not only a resource for people to find sites, but it&rsquo;s a way search engines find new content that is spam-free. And if BOTW can grow into a larger directory, while avoiding a lot of the politics of DMOZ, this is welcomed news.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/best-of-the-web-aims-to-be-the-next-dmoz.html">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/web-directories-battle-for-1-spot-2008-04/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 240/258 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-12 12:00:09 -->
