<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; BlogRush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/blogrush/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The BlogRush Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/the-blogrush-battle-2007-09</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/the-blogrush-battle-2007-09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal </dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlogRush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=40585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not seeing anything more than a handful of clicks from the <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/blogrush-offers-free-syndicated-blog-traffic.html" title="BlogRush">BlogRush</a> network and the service is <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/blogrush-finally-adds-reports-but-traffic-is-very-poor.html" title="BlogRush struggling">still struggling</a> to deliver the syndication credits it owes us. At least BlogRush has emailed its users acknowledging their concerns and also&#160;admitting that&#160;&#8221;bozos have come out of the woodwork and are trying to cheat the BlogRush system.&#8221; No, really?</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;m still not seeing anything more than a handful of clicks from the <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/blogrush-offers-free-syndicated-blog-traffic.html" title="BlogRush">BlogRush</a> network and the service is <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/blogrush-finally-adds-reports-but-traffic-is-very-poor.html" title="BlogRush struggling">still struggling</a> to deliver the syndication credits it owes us. At least BlogRush has emailed its users acknowledging their concerns and also&nbsp;admitting that&nbsp;&rdquo;bozos have come out of the woodwork and are trying to cheat the BlogRush system.&rdquo; No, really?</p>
<p><span id="more-40585"></span></p>
<p>Here are the steps BlogRush says they&rsquo;re taking to cut down on the spam and increase the quality of the network.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>1. We&rsquo;re moving to a MANUAL REVIEW process. No more automation. We will be reviewing ALL blogs submitted to BlogRush. If the quality of the blog is poor, they will not be allowed to participate. We&rsquo;re going to start reviewing ALL the blogs that are currently in our network and will be disabling the accounts for poor quality blogs.</p>
<p>2. We&rsquo;re continuing to add security measures to our system and we will be mass-removing any and all cheaters that we discover. We will not rest until the cheaters are WIPED OUT and kept from abusing our network. The manual review process will help eliminate most of them as legitimate bloggers that have put in the time to create a decent blog aren&rsquo;t the types that are going to be abusing the system.</p>
<p>All of these changes will only benefit our users ? it wil increase their click-through rates and drive more traffic to their blogs. It will also make sure that the blogs their widget links to are only quality blogs.</p>
<p>For everyone that has signed up for an account and has been testing BlogRush on their blog, thank you for your patience. Please know that we are working as quickly as possible to improve the service.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&rsquo;m going to give them a few more days, but I&rsquo;m not convinced that the service can win the spamming battle. If the number of spammy comments left on our&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?s=blogrush" title="BlogRush Posts">BlogRush posts</a> is anything to go by, this one might soon enter the dead-pool.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/blogrush-battling-bozos.html#comments" title="Comment on the BlogRush battle">Comments</a></p>
<p>Tag: </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/the-blogrush-battle-2007-09/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 190/200 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 03:18:44 -->
