<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Blogging Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/blogging-ethics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FM &#8216;Spokesbloggers&#8217; Called Out</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/fm-spokesbloggers-called-out-2007-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/fm-spokesbloggers-called-out-2007-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battelle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversational Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federated Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sand Pounding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=38830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've said it before: Sell out first. That way they expect it from you. Another blogstorm erupted last weekend over Federated Media's involvement with Microsoft's new &#34;conversational marketing&#34; idea. <br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it before: Sell out first. That way they expect it from you. Another blogstorm erupted last weekend over Federated Media&#8217;s involvement with Microsoft&#8217;s new &quot;conversational marketing&quot; idea. <br />
<span id="more-38830"></span> <br />
These storms brew and recede from time to time. The weekend before last&#8217;s storm was about whether 30 was <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2007/06/19/is-30-too-old-to-be-a-web-visionary" title="Is 30 Too Old?">too geezer</a> to think up anything good. </p>
<p>This time, it&#8217;s an <a title="As Seen On TechMeme" href="http://www.techmeme.com/070622/p97#a070622p97">ethics debate</a> about whether or not John Battelle&#8217;s arrangement, whereby bloggers in the FM network answered the question &quot;When did you know your business was People Ready?&quot; on their blogs and, in return, Microsoft placed cost-per-click ads on the network. </p>
<p><a title="Spokebloggers" href="http://valleywag.com/tech/federated-media/microsoft-pays-star-writers-to-recite-slogan-271485.php">Valleywag</a> called them out, specifically Michael Arrington, Om Malik, Paull Kedrosky, Matt Marshall and Fred Wilson (who was in the eye of the last blogstorm), calling them &quot;spokesbloggers.&quot;</p>
<p>And then, the blogosphere went ape. </p>
<p><a title="Om's Mea Culpa" href="http://gigaom.com/2007/06/22/on-the-microsoft-ad-campaign/">Om Malik </a>was quick to respond, apologizing and calling for FM to pull the ads:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>I have requested Federated Media, our sales partners, suspend the campaign on our network of sites, and they have. We are turning off any such campaigns that might be running on our network. Would I participate in a similar campaign again? Nothing is worth gambling the readers&rsquo; trust.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a title="Federated Media's Defense" href="http://www.federatedmedia.net/blog/archives/2007/06/a_follow_up.php">John Battelle</a> agreed:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Well, we certainly stepped in it&hellip;.Microsoft was attempting something new, certainly something entirely new for the company, in any case &#8211; it was inviting authors into the marketing conversation. We tried to do it in a way that was transparent, that had integrity, where no editorial space was purchased.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a title="TechCrunch " href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=409">Michael Arrington</a>, though, was a bit more defiant:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;<em>So here&rsquo;s my position on all of this: Go pound sand. People understand that if there&rsquo;s text in an ad box, someone is paying for it to be there.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><em>The main thing I&rsquo;m pissed off about right now is that they pulled all the ads, which mean we&rsquo;re taking a revenue hit. We&rsquo;re running a business here, and have payroll to make. We run ads to make that payroll. Those ads have now been pulled.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>For those of you that are too Midwest suburban, &quot;pound sand&quot; is explained at the <a title="definition of pound sand " href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pound+sand">Urban Dictionary</a>, which won&#8217;t explain to Arrington&#8217;s employees why their paychecks bounced, or why it&#8217;s not really Valleywag&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>Whichever side you take on the issue, <a title="The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs" href="http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2007/06/new-logo-for-gigaom-or-techcrunch.html">Fake Steve Jobs</a> opines about which side the bloggers took it (complete with illustrations):</p>
<blockquote><p><em>He [Arrington] ends up sounding like a gal who&#8217;s trying to convince you that she&#8217;s not a &quot;prostitute,&quot; she&#8217;s an &quot;escort.&quot;</p>
<p>What makes this delicious is that these &quot;spokesbloggers&quot; are the same sanctimonious tw*ts who are constantly spouting bullsh*t about the glories of &quot;citizen journalism&quot; and patting themselves on the back and congratulating themselves for being so much more ethical and independent than the dreaded &quot;Mainstream Media.&quot; </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Ouch.</p>
<p>Battelle notes in his lengthy post at FM that he still thinks there is a future for conversational marketing, and some of the more objective (if there is such a thing) bloggers have noted that the whole scandal could have been avoided with <a title="Scoble's View" href="http://www.webpronews.com/blogtalk/2007/06/25/dislcose-if-youre-going-to-sell-your-soul">full disclosure</a> about the campaign.</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/fm-spokesbloggers-called-out-2007-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 207/224 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 12:56:39 -->
