<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Attachment Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/attachment-size/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Maximizes Maximum Attachment Size</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-maximizes-maximum-attachment-size-2007-05</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-maximizes-maximum-attachment-size-2007-05#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caverly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attachment Size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=37903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If bigger is better, well . . . Gmail&#8217;s definitely better.&#160; The service just doubled its maximum allowable attachment size from 10 to 20 MB, and, in doing so, surely caused a few envious stares (and angry glares) within Yahoo&#8217;s and Microsoft&#8217;s respective headquarters.<br />
<br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If bigger is better, well . . . Gmail&rsquo;s definitely better.&nbsp; The service just doubled its maximum allowable attachment size from 10 to 20 MB, and, in doing so, surely caused a few envious stares (and angry glares) within Yahoo&rsquo;s and Microsoft&rsquo;s respective headquarters.</p>
<p><span id="more-37903"></span><a title="Gmail Attachments (Can) Double In Size" href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/05/gmail-doubles-maximum-attachment-size.html"> Ionut Alex Chitu</a>, who first noticed the upgrade, also pointed out one problem that it creates.&nbsp; &ldquo;[F]ew mail providers will accept . . . such a big message,&rdquo; he writes, but &ldquo;it&rsquo;s safe to send messages bigger than 10 MB to other Gmail accounts, to Yahoo Mail Plus or to other premium accounts.&rdquo;&nbsp; Otherwise, you (or the intended recipient of your email) might be out of luck.</p>
<p>And of course, allowing larger attachments doesn&rsquo;t begin to address some other <a title="Gmail Wants Your Input" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/04/11/gmail-seeks-user-input">Gmail-related issues</a>.&nbsp; &ldquo;It would be nice if Gmail showed a progress bar for the upload and if uploading files to Gmail was faster and more reliable,&rdquo; notes Chitu.&nbsp; &ldquo;But maybe we&rsquo;re asking too much.&rdquo;</p>
<p>It appears that the attachment upgrade will have to suffice for now, anyway; if, by some chance, you want to send an even larger file, <a title="Seven Alternatives For Sending Large Files" href="http://mashable.com/2007/05/23/7-ways-to-send-huge-files-25x-bigger-than-gmail/">Adam Ostrow</a> lists several alternatives.&nbsp; Yet a number of people have pointed out that they don&rsquo;t even want to receive something as large as a 20 MB attachment, so Google seems to have satisfied the general public&rsquo;s needs in that respect.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/gmail-maximizes-maximum-attachment-size-2007-05/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 193/203 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 18:51:20 -->
