<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Andy Greenberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/andy-greenberg/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Forbes Finds SEO Red Light District</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/forbes-finds-seo-red-light-district-2007-05</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/forbes-finds-seo-red-light-district-2007-05#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 16:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Greenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supplemental Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=37366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>SEO is a difficult topic for anybody new to the game. It's proved especially difficult for Forbes, where an article about &#34;Google Hell&#34; had the experts shaking their heads. Not to rag too much on Forbes, the article did present an opportunity for clarification about Google's supplemental index. <br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO is a difficult topic for anybody new to the game. It&#8217;s proved especially difficult for Forbes, where an article about &quot;Google Hell&quot; had the experts shaking their heads. Not to rag too much on Forbes, the article did present an opportunity for clarification about Google&#8217;s supplemental index. </p>
<p>An opportunity so ripe, Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts posts at length about, for those who still have questions. With some luck, we&#8217;ll get two great posts from Matt this week, as we&#8217;re told he plans to blog about Google&#8217;s controversial link-buying spam reports before he goes on vacation. </p>
<p>Forbes&#8217; Andy Greenberg wrote an article &quot;<a href="http://www.forbes.com/home/technology/2007/04/29/sanar-google-skyfacet-tech-cx_ag_0430googhell.html" title="Condemned to Google Hell">Condemned to Google Hell</a>.&quot;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&quot;What the heck is Google Hell?&quot; asks Marketing Pilgrim&#8217;s <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/what-the-heck-is-google-hell.html" title="Andy Questions Forbes">Andy Beal</a>, an industry veteran. Greenberg says &quot;Google Hell&quot; is industry jargon for the supplemental index, and Beal admits he missed <a href="http://www.jimboykin.com/damned-to-google-hell-supplemental-results/" title="The Depths of Google Hell">Jim Boykin&#8217;s memo</a>. </p>
<p>Greenberg cites examples of online businesses losing traffic, business, and money after condemnation in the supplemental index:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>1. One paid $35,000 to a search-marketing consultant who accidentally duplicated 90 listing pages</p>
<p>2. A consultant (who sank himself in eternal text) credited his own pages dropping due to an algorithmic glitch and not because of his duplicate pages</p>
<p>3. A third is baffled why a reciprocal link campaign dumped him into the sandbox for a month. </p></blockquote>
<p>Not sandbox, Hell. </p>
<p>Cutts responded at length on <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-hell/" title="Matt Cutts blog">his blog</a>, first by referring to an earlier post defending the necessity for the <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/" title="Infrastructure status, January 2007">supplemental index</a>. </p>
<p>&quot;It&rsquo;s easy to read the article and come away with the impression that Google&rsquo;s supplemental results are some sort of search engine dungeon where bad pages go and sit in limbo forever, and that&rsquo;s just not true.&quot; </p>
<p>Well, Greenberg did kind of use the word &quot;dungeon.&quot; Matt has pages of his own in the index and says it has more to do with PageRank than penalties. He then hints that if there&#8217;s a sudden drop in rank that sends a page to the supplemental results, then a webmaster might want to check the quality of links. </p>
<p>But the real kicker of Cutts&#8217; response is his examination of an example cited in the article, where a condemned webmaster admits to &quot;grey-area tactics like buying links.&quot;</p>
<p>A little digging, and Matt discovered that the webmaster had employed some pretty big no-no&#8217;s like keyword spamming and excessive, unrelated reciprocal linking. </p>
<p>&quot;Reciprocal links by themselves aren&rsquo;t automatically bad,&quot; Cutts writes, &quot;but we&rsquo;ve communicated before that there is such a thing as excessive reciprocal linking.&quot;</p>
<p>The moral of the story, then, is keep your white hat on when approaching search marketing. Otherwise, Google&#8217;s coming, and Google Hell&#8217;s coming with him.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/forbes-finds-seo-red-light-district-2007-05/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 215/227 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 14:33:59 -->
