<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; affiliate sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/affiliate-sites/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Credibility and Affiliate Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/credibility-and-affiliate-sites-2007-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/credibility-and-affiliate-sites-2007-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=42699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Many Thin Affiliate Sites Look Real</h3>
<p>Some of my friends publish fake review sites which organize product recommendations by using the following quality measurement and rating system (affiliate payout per conversion * conversion rate). If people buy it, it must be good. ;)</p>
<p>I have other friends who do real in-depth reviews, but they use such poor formatting that their content looks less trustworthy and more advertisement-like than fake review websites.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Many Thin Affiliate Sites Look Real</h3>
<p>Some of my friends publish fake review sites which organize product recommendations by using the following quality measurement and rating system (affiliate payout per conversion * conversion rate). If people buy it, it must be good. <img src='http://www.webpronews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have other friends who do real in-depth reviews, but they use such poor formatting that their content looks less trustworthy and more advertisement-like than fake review websites.</p>
<h3>Adding Signs of Trust</h3>
<p>Smart affiliates know how to convey a sense of trust and look editorial to enhance conversion rates. Editorial rating systems, privacy policies, headings, subheadings, security symbols, pricing data, reviews, features, a clean site design, and consumer generated content increase conversion rates. Assume I am only skimming your page. Assume the little things matter.</p>
<h3>A Well Done Affiliate Site</h3>
<p>While I do not agree with all the reviews, I can appreciate how well done Mike&#8217;s Marketing Tools is. Most of the reviews look impartial. And some of the reviews, like <a href="http://www.mikes-marketing-tools.com/optilink.html">the Optilink review</a>, even link out to a thin affiliate site owned by Mike that passes as the official site after Google banned the official site!</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41548/0/cc?z=1"><img width="336" height="55" border="0" alt="" src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41548/0/vc?z=1&amp;dim=41555" /></a></div>
<h3>A Poorly Done Official Site</h3>
<p>&nbsp;Take a look at how spammy and <em>thin affiliate</em> AnnualCreditReport.com looks. It is the official site (required by law) but it looks like crap because Experian does not get paid if you use it. In fact, it even kicks you over to the Experian site before seeing results, requires you fill out identity verification surveys, and tries to upsell you on a paid reporting service before showing you your free report.</p>
<p>Compare its drab look and nasty conversion process to the look of FreeCreditReport.com. Which one looks more trustworthy? Yup, its the one that is charging your credit card recurring for something that is &quot;free&quot;.</p>
<h3>Does Your Site Look Legit?</h3>
<p>Thin slicing information credibility is often about evaluating appearance. Unfortunately many of the people creating real content don&#8217;t put as much effort into formatting and marketing <a href="http://tropicalseo.com/2007/everything-you-need-to-know-about-fro-fake-review-optimization/">as the people creating fake content do</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seobook.com/information-credibility-glance-does-your-site-look-thin-affiliate#comments">Comments</a></p>
<p>Tag: </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/credibility-and-affiliate-sites-2007-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 198/210 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 08:16:45 -->
