<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; 10 blue links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/10-blue-links/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Move on to SEO Techniques that Work</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/move-on-to-seo-techniques-that-work-2008-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/move-on-to-seo-techniques-that-work-2008-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Goodman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 blue links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocal linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=42988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="text">SEO techniques typically linger long after their &#34;good til&#34; dates. 2008 should be no exception, but if you're paying attention it's time to move onto the stuff that works.<br /><br />This <a href="http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/7-seo-techniques-that-google-smashed-in-2007">useful review of techniques that Google clamped down on</a> this year included:<br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="text">SEO techniques typically linger long after their &quot;good til&quot; dates. 2008 should be no exception, but if you&#8217;re paying attention it&#8217;s time to move onto the stuff that works.</p>
<p>This <a href="http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/7-seo-techniques-that-google-smashed-in-2007">useful review of techniques that Google clamped down on</a> this year included:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Ho-hum reciprocal linking schemes.</span> I link to you because you link to me. The authors of the article said &quot;time to get one-way links&quot;. What!? Are you crazy? Do you know how hard that is in this day and age? Well, there are a couple of ways to achieve this. Do something cool enough that people really want their friends to know about it. Or, send someone a brown envelope full of cash for a link. Google can&#8217;t track this (yet). Don&#8217;t overpay.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Ye Olde Directories.</span> So-called &quot;directories&quot; that are only in business so lazy business owners can &quot;get links&quot; so &quot;Google ranks them better&quot; have been on the way out for some time. Little wonder; there is no editorial discretion and as directories they are useless to 99.9% of the population. In fact, I bet Googlers (manually looking for trouble) see a JoeAnt link as a red flag for further investigation. So what now? When Ye Olde Directories are gone, something may have to take their place, so it seems we&#8217;re in a bit of a warped phase of widespread soft-spamming of Wikipedia, Digg, Reddit, and &#8211; as long as it&#8217;s a trusted circle of some sort &#8211; you name it. Gray is getting grayer. How Google chooses to weight all the many potential quality and &quot;not-spam&quot; signals out there is anyone&#8217;s guess, but you can guess this much: Google can&#8217;t possibly have perfect answers to combat ever-increasing levels of opportunism in the pursuit of visibility. What I personally see as legitimate in this ethical and practical quagmire? See above, under &quot;Do something cool enough&#8230;&quot;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Bye-bye to 10 Blue Links, Hello Universal.</span> I get the concept, but are we being oversold by a reinvented crop of Universal Gurus eager to create a new SEO sub-specialization for themselves? I&#8217;d love to see some empirical data about how the gradual decline of the &quot;10 Blue Links&quot; concept is actually affecting companies&#8217; search referral traffic, regardless of whether they profess to &quot;get it&quot; or not.</li>
</ul>
<p>(hat tip <a href="http://www.searchengineroundtable.com/">Search Engine Roundtable</a>)</p>
<p>One thing that won&#8217;t change: search marketing professionals will be selling you something this year. With the authors of that article, I hope folks will at least be buying relatively current services, not futile make-work projects.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.traffick.com/2008/01/if-its-hard-do-it.asp">Comments</a><br type="_moz" /></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/move-on-to-seo-techniques-that-work-2008-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 197/209 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 18:19:18 -->
