Should Twitter Change Its Timeline Feature?

Chris CrumSocial Media

Share this Post

There have been rumors and fears for quite some time that Twitter would one day implement an algorithmic timeline, which would essentially be its equivalent to Facebook's News Feed. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like many users want that.

Would you favor an algorithmic approach to the Twitter timeline? Should they make it an option? Should they just leave things alone altogether? Tell us what you think.

Fueling the rumors, Twitter CFO Anthony Noto recently spoke at the Citi Global Technology Conference about priorities at the company, which according to The Wall Street Journal, include an algorithm-driven content feed, a better search engine, and group chatting. I don't think many will complain about better search or group chatting, but that algorithm-driven content feed part has people up in arms.

The WSJ reports:

Twitter’s timeline is organized in reverse chronological order, a delivery system that has not changed since the product was created eight years ago and one that some early adopters consider sacred to the core Twitter experience. But this “isn’t the most relevant experience for a user,” Noto said. Timely tweets can get buried at the bottom of the feed if the user doesn’t have the app open, for example. “Putting that content in front of the person at that moment in time is a way to organize that content better.”

Some reactions from users:

I'd have included tweets in favor of the change if I saw any.

Suffice it to say, a lot of people are frustrated with Twitter right now, even though the big changes haven't gone into effect yet (if they even do). The company is, however, also responsible for the death of Twitpic apparently.

Twitter has already started to tinker with the Timeline a bit, adding favorites from people you follow, for example, though as CEO Dick Costolo said, these only appear when you refresh your timeline twice and they have no additional content to show you. You're more likely to see that stuff if you don't follow many accounts.

The kind of change Noto seems to be referring to would make Twitter much more Facebook-like, and that means your organic reach will be in jeopardy just as it has been on Facebook. Getting in front of your followers will be at the mercy of Twitter, who is pushing advertising more than ever.

We may see some controversial days ahead.

Of course some tweets would benefit from an algorithmic approach. As Twitter's analytics made clear, most tweets already aren't getting a great amount of reach to begin with. The algorithm approach could mean more visibility for more of your content, which could lead to things like more web traffic and more conversions. But it would still be at the mercy of Twitter, and it would ultimately come down to what kind of content Twitter felt like showing to users. Obviously, they want you to spend money on advertising, so it's hard to imagine the benefits for unpaid content would outweigh the need to pay to play.

What do you think? Is an algorithmic Twitter Timeline a good idea? Let us know in the comments.

Image via Twitter

Chris Crum
Chris Crum has been a part of the WebProNews team and the iEntry Network of B2B Publications since 2003. Follow Chris on Twitter, on StumbleUpon, on Pinterest and/or on Google: +Chris Crum.