Quantcast

Secret Photos Of Residents Subject Of Art Exhibition

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


<
[ Life]

An L.A. artist is on the receiving end of some backlash this week after his exhibition opened in New York, because the subjects are none too pleased about the way they turned out. Mostly because they weren’t aware they were being photographed.

Arne Svenson took the pictures with a telephoto lens through his loft window, aiming the camera into the apartments across the way…and therefore, into strangers’ lives. The exhibition, titled “The Neighbors”, is drawing criticism and outright outrage this week as the subjects have realized just how much Svenson saw.

“This is about kids. If he’s waiting there for hours with his camera, who knows what kind of footage he has. I can recognize items from my daughter’s bedroom,” one resident said.

The gallery owner, Julie Saul, is surprised at the anger she’s seen from some of the subjects and says most of the feedback she’s gotten about the pieces is positive. As for Svenson, he never shows the faces of his subjects.

“For my subjects, there is no question of privacy,” he said in the exhibition statement. “They are performing behind a transparent scrim on a stage of their own creation with the curtain raised high. I am not unlike the birder, quietly waiting for hours, watching for the flutter of a hand or a movement of a curtain as an indication that there is life within.”

Of course, many artists are controversial in what they do and for some, that is just the point. Last year, Damien Hirst found himself on the receiving end of some backlash of his own after using live butterflies in an exhibit and inadvertently killing 9,000 of them. But some say that filming others without their knowledge is pushing more boundaries than an artist should.

For now, Svenson’s show is on display at the Julie Saul gallery in Chelsea.

Secret Photos Of Residents Subject Of Art Exhibition
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • Abuse

    This ‘artist’ should be taken to task. I don’t give a rat’s a$$ if he doesn’t show people faces. Evidently he’s drinking the bozo bloomberg’s koolaid about how people should have no expectation of privacy and places an excessive number of cameras/cctv around NYC so that everyone knows he’s watching them drink their extra large beverage, salty fries and smoking a self-rolled smoke. This guy (and king bloomberg for that matter) is a peeping tom and trying to get paid for doing it. Does he get any pictures of kids “inadvertently” that he then has to delete/destroy? From the article, it doesn’t appear that he’s taking pictures of birds and rendering the people in the windows to bocah. He is invading their privacy where they have a right and more than reasonable expectation to it, whether the curtain is drawn up or not.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter