Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Rumor: Dmoz Selling To BOTW

Will this change your Google juice?

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 88 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. So this is not true? oh ok.

  2. I own many domains (about 40), and only one of them is actually listed in DMOZ, and in my opinion the reason why is simple: most of them don’t deserve to be in DMOZ. I may not want to admit it, and it would be easy to point the bony finger and cry corruption, but the truth is that most of my sites don’t belong in the directory and I think many others who are firing off here probably don’t have sites that make the cut either. It is tough to chew on and swallow, but no one said the truth would taste good.

  3. I think the DMOZ is overrated nowadays anyway, i am not listed there and although all my competitors are i still do well in the rankings. Too many people put to much emphasis on getting listed, at the end of the day it still only adds up to one link.

  4. I know it does seem to take a long time to get a client list in DMOZ but do think it’s worth the effort.

  5. Seems like a conflict of interest to me. The fact that only a few websites can gain access to DMOZ and the 95% of other websites around the net can’t. I think you have to paid big dollars to get yourself listed on that directory.

  6. Google only punishes smaller competition, They say they dont put up with site’s that sell’s link’s, but they are full of it. BOTW sell’s links for a hefty price and says it’s for a review, nothing more the a disclaimer. Let a smaller directory try that as see how fast they get black listed.

    As far as DMOZ it’s hard to believe that most of the editors are not corrupt. Most of the editors there probably couldn’t get any of their site’s listed, and what better way then to become an editor. For the few editor’s that are not corrupt, they act like it’s there duty to turn down site’s, as if being an editor comes with alot of prestige and their poop dont stink.

    Maybe they should sell DMOZ to BOTW, that way they can get rid of these so called “editors” and start charging for links as they always have been.

  7. Yay im included in both but i was a bit worried about having to pay money to join botw due to googles veiw of it but i did it anyway. Something i dont normally do. Im releived to hear that google doesnt mind as they dont mind with yahoo dir.

  8. There is some interesting feedback in this thread, although I can’t say I agree with a lot of it. I have never accepted money to list a site, and I am not an SEO guy. I have a day job that is completely unrelated to the internet and the category I edit at DMOZ. I review sites in my category pretty regularly, submit new sites and clean up old ones, and I try to answer all inquiries. Although I can not speak for every last person who volunteers at DMOZ, I find it difficult to believe “they” are all corrupt because I am one of “them” and I consider myself to be a person of strong integrity and I do the best I can in the spare time that I have.

    I own many domains (about 40), and only one of them is actually listed in DMOZ, and in my opinion the reason why is simple: most of them don’t deserve to be in DMOZ. I may not want to admit it, and it would be easy to point the bony finger and cry corruption, but the truth is that most of my sites don’t belong in the directory and I think many others who are firing off here probably don’t have sites that make the cut either. It is tough to chew on and swallow, but no one said the truth would taste good.

    Is DMOZ perfect? If they were, then they would be the first on the net to be perfect. .. meaning no one is. For those who are genuinely concerned, I would suggest that they apply as an editor, for the right reasons. I did, and I didn’t have any problems getting picked up. BTW: That I know of: I have never met or spoken to another DMOZ editor, in person or on the net. … if there is a secret circle then I must be standing on the outside of it.

    • When you say most of the sites don’t make “the cut”, your tone epitomizes the very core of what “most” people are complaning about. I believe that most of the people complaining about DMOZ are speaking from common sense experience rather than being bitter about “not making “the cut”. Most of the catagories i’ve experienced are littered with sites that just simply should not have made “the cut” while many worthy sites lye in cue. I suppose you would have to belong to the “secret circle” to understand WHY?

  9. I think the sale would make sense to be honest. Although not as possible as DMOZ, BOTW has done a great job listing mostly high quality websites, and I believe they are authority in their own right.

  10. Well sounds like a lot of others have had the same experience with DMOZ that I have. We have been trying to get our site, Tribal Sports Wear’s Blank Wholesale T-Shirts Club listed with them for about a year now. With of course no luck, I have even emailed the editor for my catagory asking for advice and what I should change (if anything) to make my site appropriate for listing. Would you believe that I have received no reply as of yet. I’m not sure if BOTW buying them is good or not. I do know that I still don’t like paying to have my site included in a directory. It’s really simple, search engines bread and butter are site links. With out quality sites indexed in their system they have nothing to feed their users. So if I have to pay to get in, then they just lost 1 more quality site link for their index.

    Tribal Sports Wear

    Blank Wholesale T-Shirts and Apparel Club and we are open to the public!

  11. I have been trying for several years

    to get listed not working

    What are they protecting ?

    the internet or is someone paying them to keep

    some sites out

    just type nitenet on any search you will find my sites

    google yahoo all

    type     fresh life ministries       same here

    to get listed just blog about them they will list you

    search robots love blogs they look for them

    there should be a ruling that if you offer a search site you should

    index a site when asked first time free

     

  12. I hope they will help revive DMOZ…Because it has been dying for years now…

  13. Jen

    I was trying to post my unique e-cards website at DMOZ since 2002. But not a single time it was accepted. Whereas, I could find links in DMOZ directory which were just parked pages or died domains. Does any DMOZ editor ever reviews his page for broken links?

  14. I submitted my site DMOZ about two years ago, and was listed within 30 days. And with 30 days of that was #1 for my main keyword and have been since.

    However, my PR  did not change from before I was included to after.  My site traffic did not increase, nothing changed… I honestly can’t see any effect.

    • I’m tryong to include my website into DMOZ dir from 2 years, but nothing… i receive visits anyway!

      • Hopefully any takeover will make DMOZ entry alot easier and give us poor SEO lot reasons for when sites arent listed!

  15. Dan

    Dmoz died a long time ago.

    Can only see this as a good thing that someone sorts out The ODP that Google still places too much weight on.

    BOTW is probably the best directory out there currently, so makes sense.

  16. This could be a good move if BOTW owns DMOZ. BOTW has good name and I think they will bring some new ideas for DMOZ. I hope DMOZ inclusion will be quicker once BOTW take over this.

  17. Shoemacher is a liar who is just intersted in earning money with ad-nonsense. This guy has just found the easiest way to do nothing in his life.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>