Quantcast

Resurrect Jeeves, Ask How Not To Slam Google

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


[ Search]

Here’s the thing about boldness: you’d better have the chops to back it up. While Ask.com’s anti-Google guerrilla marketing campaign in London’s Underground was outed in record time, indexing of its own campaign site was even close to a record.

Background

Ads appearing in the Tube encouraged bystanders to fight Google’s "information monopoly."

At the same time, searching for the term "Google" on Ask.com’s engine brought up a "Smart Answer" (here, it takes on the sardonic wit of a soon-to-be-back-handed teenager) featuring a man in a business suit, carrying a briefcase, on puppet-strings. "Don’t be a droid," read the snippet, "use different sources to get information."  That admonition came equipped with a link to Information-Revolution.org.

Following that link leads to the bemoaning of the fact that three-quarters of the UK use just one search engine. The authors call it "sleep searching."

The puppet Smart Answer was pulled shortly after criticism ensued.

The Cat-and-the-Canary Aftermath

Don’t believe Matt Cutts when he acts like he wasn’t dying to point out why three-quarters of UK surfers were picking Google. It’s just a Southern thing – delaying the mention of unfortunate unpleasantries until there’s no getting around it.

"Okay, I’ve been waiting for someone else to notice this," writes Cutts, "but it’s been several days now, so I guess I’ll have to be the snarky one." You know, if he absolutely has to. "The whole point of information-revolution.org is to remind people to try out other search engines, right?"

Cutts pitted the two search engines against each other to see which one had better results for the site information-revolution.org. Though his first test was confounded by the wrong command, Cutts did find that Google had 19 results for the site, compared to Ask’s one indexed page.

And it appeared to be an older version of the page, the language of which is a bit different than what shows up now.

But really, guys, he just hated to have to point that out.

Resurrect Jeeves, Ask How Not To Slam Google


Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • AcaiFruitMLM

    How would we list this website with both?

    http://acaiplus.com/1

  • Andrew

    Did you not notice that Cutts retracted this when he found out that it was his error to use the wrong site operator? Ask had the site the whole time. Since this is the premise of your post, JLM, you may want to point this out.

    Would have made a great gotcha though had it been true.

  • Andrew

    Did you not notice that Cutts retracted this when he found out that it was his error to use the wrong site operator? Ask had the site the whole time. Since this is the premise of your post, JLM, you may want to point this out.

    Would have made a great gotcha though had it been true.

    • Jason Lee Miller

      Yes I did notice that, which is why I didn’t report that part. When Cutts adjusted his test, he did find that Google had indexed more of the site’s pages and the versions of the pages Ask had cached were older and (to my understanding) not visibile anymore. The second test still showed the slowness and limits of Ask’s spiders compared to Google’s.

      Hence the info monopoly Google has in the UK.

      So I still think it’s a great gotcha.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom