WebProNews

well...but in many search phrases, when using Wonder wheels I got irrelevant result....may be Google is working on it...who knows.

Thanks for sharing your insight. I look forward to more posts from you.

good idea
The best nike shox shoes you can find on the shopping online , not only men nike shoes and nike shoes women but also Nike Shox Shoes NZ ,Nike Shox Shoes Torch ,Nike Shox Shoes Turb and so on are great choices,we give you the cheap price and make sure the quality keeping high .

Great blog here. Keep it up! Please try to include more information if possible.
regards
weber grill recipes

good post,thank you!
cheap uggs,you can buy ugg mini boots and cheap ugg coquette sale

actually, I did not know much about seo .. but in the end thanks to a little understood your writing, thank you

informative information, thanks for sharing.........

I use Google to search for information and am always amazed at the irrelevant information returned for the keywords I have used, it can mean trolling through several thousand pages and even searching within search results proves useless.

Have Google got us running round in circles in the belief that they are the best search engine in the world? Is Google really that good, from experience I think not and am beginning to wonder if the real aim of Google is to keep relevant sites out of searches so that they can generate advertising revenue.

I manage some 50 websites, all use Google Analytics as well as other visitor counting software. Many of the visitors to these websites are from other sites or personal recommendation. For every 15 visitors sent by Google 1 visitors is sent by Yahoo. Of the 15 Google visitors 51% leave visiting only one page, 49% read between two and 20 pages and may remain on site for between 2 minutes and 30 minutes. Many visitors return within a few days or even two or three times the same day.

The visitors who arrive via Yahoo read around 10 pages a visit, they register with the site and return. It appears from our figures that Google send more irrelevant visitors and their search works poorly or is that intentional? Yahoo and several other search engines and directories perform better for us than Google.

There was a point when we were tempted to advertise on Google because we were persuaded that we were missing out on business. The advertising increased visitor numbers by over 130%, bounce rate by over 80% and we estimated that nearly 50% of the visitors shown clicking through to the site never arrived. When we asked Google why they responded by saying that these visitors were searching between the ads for a better deal so several clicks would be one person surfing the ads and would not show up on analytics. We stopped advertising.

We are very lucky in being able to meet in person many of the visitors to our websites and they confirm the number of visits they make and that our websites are either bookmarked or they take up a feed. We are also linked with dozens of websites that are highly ranked by Google or are government sites yet the Google webmaster tools do not show the links or feeds.

In my opinion Google is over rated and the quality of visitors are poor reminding me of the old adage, “Quantity or Quality.” Another interesting figure is Google list around 300 pages for each of our websites, Yahoo list an average of one to two pages per website suggesting the Yahoo search is more accurate.

Many of the visitors to one of our websites complains that our website shows up on page 20 and a site using the same keywords shows up on page one and has no relevance to the search and the content is rubbish. Perhaps Google should concentrate on relevant content rather than the science of search engine listing.

I'm still not seeing the new "Options" field in the Google search engine, am I missing something?

I think these options are long overdue, but I am thankful they have finally arrived. I think this could be a big step in the right direction, allowing users to search by date will drastically reduce the irrelevant material often found from years gone, about a subject that has changed so much since a certain page was created.

Some websites have been around for years with vast content, and this is hard to compete with. By having similar but more up to date content relased more recently, may allow new internet marketers and new websites more of a chance in a very big pond.

Of late-with SEO becoming a more necessity- new entrants have been focussing too much on the SEO aspects they learn in classrooms like on page optimization and the like. With these changes and additions, Google has once again sought to gently remind them that content is indded still the king.

We ought not to forget the webpages have to be written with the customer/visitor in mind and not for search engines. I believe this paradigm has to be remembered by SEO consultants too. Usually we see they play around with keywords and rite their content around that, but it must be the other way around. And this is what google wants too!

Manish Pahuja

In South Africa Internet access and bandwidth isn't cheap, and we know many people avoid video because of its size and download time.

We believe content will always be king and this is how our own website, and websites of our clients are designed. At times we've been too busy to quickly get around to correctly coding the HTML of our own website regards meta keywords and meta description, and have been pleasantly surprised when notice those pages are coming up on page one of Google search results merely for the content on the page.

However, we have also noticed that having a page one search result for various keywords or key phrases does not necessarily mean it results in a lot of visits to one's website. It's difficult trying to explain this to new website owners who want guarantees from web designers and SEO specialists that their site will be found on page one of search results, as what's the point if no further marketing is done?

Target markets need to be reached in many other places (websites), and we have found posting appropriate content (appropriate to both the website one is posting on and your own website) on blogs, forums, social networks, and the like, definitely increases traffic to one's own website (and as long as a link back to your own site is allowed on that website).

We don't think the new Google search format will change anything, other than making it a little more difficult for the man on the street to simply and quickly find what they're looking for, because of too many choices being offered - people who don't spend hours and hours every day on the Internet, and just want to use it for quick results from time to time - and there are millions of these people, who are potential customers of every website out there.

I agree that the same technique and advice is still good, thank god.

These recent changes in search should be analyzed by all SEO companies to really improve their offerings.