Well, most of them | WebProNews

Text:

| Print

| Share:

288 commentsSunday, November 30, 2008

Google Answers Some Tricky Questions

Well, most of them

288 Comments

By Tonny Watson (WPN reader) - Sat, 11/21/2009 - 05:29

Agree. It's a good article

Agree. It's a good article that I can apply this for my routine. I loved it, so usefully.

http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2218817

By Back Muscle Pain (WPN reader) - Fri, 11/20/2009 - 17:03

Awesome post. Answers a lot of questions that have been hanging around in like forums being "answered" by so called gurus. It's good to hear some of these answers straight from google, and the translations you gave were very helpful as well.

Thanks!

By Morgan180807 (WPN reader) - Mon, 11/16/2009 - 03:55

feww..... "Great info"

Thank you for the great post. This has cleared most of my questions. I am sure going to bookmark this post for further changes in the future. Finally "big G's" spilling some of its secret out. Are there going to be more changes in the future? If so will some of the questions be answered.

Thanks for the heads up Jason!

How to turn a girl on

By poem essay (WPN reader) - Thu, 10/15/2009 - 02:23

Thanks for providing the

Thanks for providing the useful information about CEO!

By Ecommerce Design (WPN reader) - Wed, 08/05/2009 - 15:10

450 algorithm changes...

450 algorithm changes in a year? Now that's interesting...

By gaper (WPN reader) - Wed, 08/05/2009 - 14:23

Ilegal??

Its mean ilegal??

By Home Solar Power Systems (WPN reader) - Wed, 07/29/2009 - 23:40

Its great to info out of

Its great to info out of Google.

By Evolution isnt science (WPN reader) - Tue, 05/26/2009 - 07:11

Oh well

Too much attention is given to what google wants and does. If everybody is paying attention to Matt Cutts then how shall you gain? Just make a good site, its not rocket science, and its what google wants.

By free games (WPN reader) - Mon, 06/22/2009 - 09:48

yep

agreed, there are many more search engines out there...

By Clotheslines (WPN reader) - Tue, 05/26/2009 - 07:08

So

I dont know why ppl obsess about what google reveals. Just make a site user freindly and forget the algo. Sure we can learn little tips in order to not make mistakes but google will always ensure good results a returned and so far they have beaten the spammer largly.

By Onsite Early Childhood Training by DVD (WPN reader) - Thu, 05/14/2009 - 20:15

Thanks for the

Thanks for the article...Pagerank has always been one of those grey areas for me and I found you did a great job of explaining it better..thanks heaps!

By grace (WPN reader) - Wed, 05/13/2009 - 15:07

articles

thans for summering it up . simple neat and clean

By Walter (WPN reader) - Thu, 04/16/2009 - 07:12

SEO

I'm glad to see that Google emphasizes on original content and user experience. But what I would like to see in the future are higher rankings for articles that are current, since a lot of content out there is extremely out-dated.

By Meeting rooms (WPN reader) - Fri, 05/01/2009 - 11:01

You know, I can't say about

You know, I can't say about those sites specifically. I think Google probably takes it on a case-by-case basis and you probably should too. If you're getting benefit from it why stop? I think the emphasis was on low quality article directories and, apparently, syndication across multiple directories...the user-experience doesn't seem great on those types of things, but I'm just one user. The only thing I can say, from a writer's perspective, it's usually not just THAT you are published, but WHERE you are published and how many people are able to access what you write...some write for the purity and love the obscurity and others actually want to be heard...for most it's the latter. So the question is likely, are you being heard? If so, don't fix it if it ain't broke.

Meeting rooms Manchester

By Eric (WPN reader) - Tue, 04/14/2009 - 05:03

Answers by Google

Some of these answers have come as a surprise to me because I used to think the other way around.
Specially these:
1) How often does your search algorithm change?
2) Could sharing an IP address with a bad site get my site penalized?
3) Is there PageRank boost from .edu or .gov links?

While the others were quite according to my expectations.

By Guest (WPN reader) - Tue, 04/07/2009 - 08:06

Nice info, thanks! Custom

Nice info, thanks!

Custom essay

By Guest (WPN reader) - Sun, 06/07/2009 - 05:31

Great information for my

Great information for my project about google! Thx you very much, snore relief

By Thesis (WPN reader) - Tue, 04/07/2009 - 08:43

Thanks for the good post.If

Thanks for the good post.If your site loads fast, your users will be happy; if it loads slow, users will be less happy. Make your users happy, right?it's hard to even find original content on the site. The user experience for a lot of those article directory sites

By Free advertising (WPN reader) - Sun, 04/05/2009 - 10:55

This is great information

This is great information for me, i never thought before that so many and complex factor in determining ranking with Google. I learn alot from this article, thank you.

By Custom Essays (WPN reader) - Tue, 04/07/2009 - 00:54

This is a good post for

This is a good post for me.It's hard to even find original content on the site. The user experience for a lot of those article directory sites can be pretty bad too. So you'd see users landing on those sorts

By Resume Writing Service (WPN reader) - Mon, 04/06/2009 - 05:24

Thanks for providing the

Thanks for providing the useful info.If the .edu or .gov page is linked to, then yes, because that webpage now has some authority, just like with any (non-.gov or .edu) page.

By Lucas (WPN reader) - Sat, 04/04/2009 - 11:27

Great content

Thanks for the advice. It would be of great help to us, since we rely so much on search engines.

Lucas
Noble Store
Blog

By FLV Converter (WPN reader) - Sun, 04/12/2009 - 22:07

sOUNDS great for more gogole

sOUNDS great for more gogole users.seos are working harder on this pro too.

By Graviditetstest (WPN reader) - Tue, 03/31/2009 - 14:23

Still many questions!

A lot of good "answers". But the most interesting part is that google changing the Algorythm will keep raising questions and keep us working..

By Dissertation Writing (WPN reader) - Sat, 04/04/2009 - 06:00

It is a good info.Lot of

It is a good info.Lot of info has been provided.This does not mean no action is being taken on the offending sites. Also, the TLD of the sites should not be a factor being taken into an account. For this reason reporting both, web spam and PageRank passing link selling makes sense and contributes.Thanks for sharing.

By Packed (WPN reader) - Fri, 04/03/2009 - 03:29

By jammy (WPN reader) - Thu, 03/19/2009 - 17:58

hi

asdf

By louis vuitton (WPN reader) - Fri, 05/22/2009 - 02:22

Those of us who run honest

Those of us who run honest sites with honest and valuable content have nothing to be concerned about - in fact, all this should be great for us. wonderful