| Advertisement |
-

Getting Noticed with Google Maps
Are you utilizing Google Maps? If not, you could be hurting your... -

Gray Areas of FTC Guidelines
Although the FTC's new advertising guidelines are scheduled to go... -

Increase Your Conversions with New Tool
According to Tim Ash, President and CEO of SiteTuners, landing page...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising












4 Comments
Superbrand tosh
I live in the UK. For American readers the superbrand judges are a bunch of London based advertising luvvies completely out of touch with ordinary - and particularly young - consumers.
Ok, I don't have a problem with Google being credited as the no.1 brand in the UK. However, I find the whole superbrand concept complete tosh. The comparison between brands in completely different categories is simply meaningless. Is BA such a superbrand when even given the price differential easyjet is a more reliable airline for shorthaul destinations? Is Mercedes such a superbrand when long term Mercedes' owners despair at the fall in quality and reliability? The superbrand judges need to get out more.
What did they based this
What did they based this on? Logo? name recognition?
Official definition
I guess this only further
I guess this only further proves the popularity of Google over other web companies.
Post new comment