Give up the Google default, search maven says

Text:

| Print

| Share:

8 commentsFriday, June 6, 2008

Danny Sullivan Wants Search Choice In Firefox

Give up the Google default, search maven says

8 Comments

By SEO Tips (WPN reader) - Sat, 03/28/2009 - 10:01

Browser

Now since Google Chrome has arrived,i don't think anyone is going to use Firefox.

By Hair Care (WPN reader) - Sat, 01/03/2009 - 06:10

Each to his own

I have never been a big fan of FireFox, but that is just me. Each to his own, I suppose?

By Legal Forms (WPN reader) - Sat, 01/03/2009 - 06:11

Funny....I was just about the comment the same thing

Yeah I completely agree, I have always preferred IE, and even the new Google Chrome is great too, but never really Firefox.

By Affordable Web Site Design Chester (WPN reader) - Wed, 06/11/2008 - 13:29

MSN and Firefox 3.0

I like MSN Live Search but it seems to take forever to index more than just a homepage of any sites I list through MSN Webmaster tools, does anyone else have the same problem?

Im looking forward to using Firefox 3, it has loads of great SEO and internet marketing tools available. Great for helping with web design.

Carpe Diem Web Site Design Chester Cheshire UK

By Guest (WPN reader) - Sun, 06/08/2008 - 14:34

Microsoft Junks

If I wanted any MS product to begin with, I'd get it myself. I use only what I have to due to the ms saturated environment and no more.

We don't need anyone's "kind" consideration for the choices they want us to have, we're perfectly capable of researching, locating and selecting what we want.

Microsoft ~anything~ is not it.

By Guest (WPN reader) - Sat, 06/07/2008 - 22:22

so for the 3 idiots that actually want live search and have difficulty adding it with a few clicks he wants the millions of people that refuse to use live search to have to do the few clicks to remove it. what a lusr.

By Marketing Minefield (WPN reader) - Sat, 06/07/2008 - 08:08

Live Search not big enough

At the moment Live Search is used far too infrequently for Mozilla to make this change. However, I'm sure if they were to win market share then it would be added to the Firefox browser.

By Asa Dotzler (WPN reader) - Fri, 06/06/2008 - 18:32

best for users

Because we're not a convicted monopolist with a business conflict of interest like Microsoft, I don't believe the same standards should apply, as Danny seems to.

Microsoft, if it was doing the best thing for its users, would put Google in as the default. But they're leveraging IE to push their last-place search engine and they really wanted to put it in as the default.

As a result of Google's justifiable concerns around Microsoft abusing its monopoly to uplift a weaker product and the public outcry that resulted when Google pushed that to the headlines, Microsoft compromised and offered new users the choice of default.

Mozilla isn't in the compromised position that Microsoft is, so we can just do the right thing for users which is to set Google as the default search service for most of our new Firefox users. (Some will get other services if they are in a locale that varies significantly.)

Danny wants to gin up some controvery claiming that this is all about the money. It's simply not. Google is the default search engine for most of Mozilla's users because Google is the best choice for most of our users. We include Yahoo in the list as the second search engine because it is the most beneficial second choice for most of our users. Live Search from Microsoft is not even a contender -- garnering only 5th place in popularity among those seeking out an additional search choice for Firefox.