| Advertisement |
9 commentsMonday, January 28, 2008
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Search + Social = Better ROI
Are you utilizing search and social media together? According to Lee... -

Yahoo Reveals SEM of Re-Brand
Near the end of September, Yahoo began a new branding campaign in an... -

Marketing in the Age of Google
Former Googler Vanessa Fox has written a book entitled Marketing in...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising












8 Comments
what???
Thats crazy.
Nothing wrong with nudity
The American people need to get over nudity as an issue. Everyone was born nude and I believe most everyone bathes nude in the shower or tub. I find nothing offensive regarding that film clip. People have worse things to see on TV than waste their time and taxpayers dollars on something as plain and common as taking a shower. GET OVER IT and move on.
Richard Erckman
Get over it!
Sorry, but I find this article the reviewers comments more appalling than the rather frank and modest shots that tell the story of a young woman who has a small child walk in her as she is about to enter the shower. This scene is NOT about sex or violence or some sort of perversion, unless you concider taking a shower perverse.
What I don't like is the sense of dread the child is made to show - children are not born with a fear of the naked body. This has to be drilled in by pathologically insecure adults, like the reviwer. Most young children would have gigled and shut the door. In many parts of world families bath, vacation, and live naked without doing any psychological harm. Only in this country, thanks to it Puritanical heratige, do people get so upset over such a harmless thing.
I say, get over it - no harm done!
No credibility for FCC
Until the FCC cracks down on violence instead of simple nudity, they have no credibility with the general public. This agency has the mindset of a fundamentalist preacher, and the timing of FEMA. No real surprise in the neo-conservatives America.
NYDP
To think anyone would even think to take the trouble to start a 1.5 million dollar court case.
I guess if your a maniac like Bush you could.
I apologize for polluting the airwaves with this trivial goo.
Alex Amsterdam
Sure glad I live in good old Canada.
Why is this such an issue?
Isn't it itnteresting? A woman drops a bathrobe to get ready to enter her shower as just about everyone does in America. A boy walks in inadvertently and, after a few awkward moments, steps out of the room and closes the door. And the FCC goes wild and levies a fine on numerous television stations years after the fact.
Meanwhile, CSI, Law and Order, and countless other programs show bullets ripping through multiple people during one hour episode. It's not enough to just have a body slumped in the corner like they did on Matlock or something. Oh no. There must be vivid detail, we've gotta see the victim's eyes bulge as they're being strangled. A - okay. Not likely to raise a murmur.
And if it's morality we're talking about I'm equally puzzled. If this woman is a stranger in the apartment is it because she spent the night with dad? That would certainly be consistent with about a thousand tv programs too. Nothing wrong with sleeping with someone on the first date and bringing her home. No reason for a fine there.
It's just a crime if we depict someone in their birthday suit in a non-sexual context like bathing. We would literally raise more ire with a commercial of a nude mom bathing with her baby for a baby shampoo than with a promo that degrades women (or men for that matter) or in which a person is diced up like a holiday turkey.
If you're ready for a more sensible approach to the human body try visiting http://www.aanr.com .
Status Quo
There are places in the world where people still walk around without clothes on. Perhaps just as shocking as this video clip - there was a time we westerners did the same thing. Raises the philosophical questions: 1/ Why have we associated shame and regret with our natural state? There is a propensity toward abuse of nudity and what it might suggest, but is not the very scandolous nature of nakedness a symptom of our prudishness? If we didn't create such a premium on it by making it so overtly suggestive and rare would there be such a clamour to exploit it? Is the Parents Television Council and the FCC investing as much time and energy on real issues like the serious, raw violence, horror and fear-mongering that is shown on TV indiscriminately? Or do these things somehow fall under our charter of rights and liberties?
Dean Unger
Sigh
I think ABC did itself in when it showed the kid's response in a shot framed between Ross's legs. That was perhaps a bit much for 9 o'clock -- though it would have been just fine an hour later. Indecency enforcement is a funny thing, but ABC should perhaps, at this stage in its long existence, be aware of exactly how funny it is.
And what Europe thinks is really neither here nor there. Though one might note that a lot of European TV is American TV, so obviously they don't have that big a problem with how uptight we are, or aren't.
Post new comment