| Advertisement |
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Increase Your Conversions with New Tool
According to Tim Ash, President and CEO of SiteTuners, landing page... -

Latest Features from Digg and StumbleUpon
Although news outlets continually bring reports about new features on... -

What's Next for Twitter API?
Although Twitter's homepage gets a tremendous amount of traffic, it...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising












3 Comments
On the battle with Google
I liked the last comment- Google is business no matter how much we would like to think otherwise, or how Google tries to convince us it's all in our best interest.
However, I would like to comment on paid-for links. For many people Google is the ultimate source of information, thus often, the less experienced would take the first few entries for the best information available. And if those are just paid content, or Adsense templates with little copy and paste from here and there-it's definitely against people's interest to see the paid links first. I think Google should separate them entirely from the search and put all of them to the right. This way the users will always know what they click(and btw, they will, i'm sure, if they are positioned right-for example if google switch the places-paid to the left, unpaid to the right). Or the other alternative-the sites with paid links should be under constant checks for relevancy of the content.
As much as people who use adwords to drive traffic to their sites would dislike it, for me, this is the right way. If you're site has good content, it'll gain visitors probably. If it you want more- use normal ads on similar sites. Or paid links could be only for sites that sell something as it'll make sense then. But for serious stuff, seeing paid links is real pain in the ass.
And just one example-I checked my analyst and for some keywords my site was after 10 or even number 40 and it was clicked!!! What that tells me-people are very unsatisfied with the way Google shows them results. And you know,unhappy user adapt very quickly.
Paid Links Are Not Evil...
Great article.
However, why can't you point out that the $14 billion in profits that Google is set to generate this year is all from Paid Links.
Matt Cutts spewing the corporate line is just another example of Google trying to control the public relations debate and make everyone believe they are a search engine when in fact they are the worlds largest online advertising agency.
The bottom line is the bottom line.
It is perfectly acceptable for me to pay Google for traffic Google. But God forbid I choose to pay some other website for exposure.
How in the world can anyone take a word Matt Cutts says seriously?
They don't even come up on the first page of their own search engine for the keyword "search engine."
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=search+engine
Their results are pitiful. Paid link would help them out quite a bit.
The ultimate hypocrisy.
Google more evil than before
I completly agree with what Harald said. The core business of Google is not creating a good search engine, but selling links. In two years I have seen my income going down on Google in relation with the number of pages I hand coded, with 60 %, and all my content is relevant to the keywords title of page, and description . Also the result they deliver are less good than before in my eyes, with less relevant results. I have seen a heavier weight on
scolarly results, but ofte
n the results are absolutly not going to the essence of the question. They still don't understand the questions like a human do, and the semantic indexing they claim is not working.
Proof is that if you ask a plain clearly to understand question, they still don't get it, see the first result at:
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&rls=GGLG...
I guess it won't take two years to see some new search engine appear that will deliver much more usefull results, and that don't penalyse webmasters for irrelevant things.
If I have a site on a specific topic, and I sell links about this topic to people who want to promote a product I can stand behind I don't see what is wrong doing.
When I see that 90 % of the paid results in Google are going to clickbank products, and other linkshare affiliates or paid inclusion result pages, you can ask yourself who is doing wrong things. The paid results from Google are absolutly not in relation with relevance of content.
David Norden
http://www.secretmarketinglinks.com
Post new comment