iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
CommentWednesday, November 21, 2007

Unvalidated Robots.Txt Risks Google Banishment

3 Comments

Experimental robots.txt syntax

Thanks for the coverage Dave. :)

Joshua, folks not familiar with the REP syntax often leave garbage or experimental statements in robots.txt. As long as the crawlers ignore those, such forgotten stuff is not a big deal. It becomes risky when a search engine experiments itself, and the engine's interpretation doesn't match the webmaster's thoughts.

robots.txt

When you put noindex is is to be excluded, so this presents no threat. In fact it accomplishes your goal. It's those spiders which ignore your wishes that you need worry about.

Noindex:

Not to be a smart a**, but why would it be surprising if Google deindexed a site/page that include Noindex: in the robots.txt??

Why would you have it in there in the first place if you didn't want to be excluded?

Maybe I missed something?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info