WebProNews

I'm not convinced that the MS results you described aren't 'better' in the sense that they're more expansive than Google's: they cover alternative interpretations of the word 'dog', which, let's face it, has a lot of alternative meanings, some of which are not very complimentary.

It's predictable that MS felt they had to issue a disclaimer. They can't be open and honest even when it might be to their advantage.

What's surprising is that Windows Vista didn't make it into the top ten in response to your query.