| Advertisement |
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Increase Your Conversions with New Tool
According to Tim Ash, President and CEO of SiteTuners, landing page... -

Latest Features from Digg and StumbleUpon
Although news outlets continually bring reports about new features on... -

What's Next for Twitter API?
Although Twitter's homepage gets a tremendous amount of traffic, it...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising












3 Comments
L.A.Times Lost it
How dare those people we (LA Timea) smear respond in their defense! and how can evil Google give them a forum!!
The L.A. Times reaction and attitude does not surprise me given their lack of ethics
and professionalism. What can you expect from a leftist publication? Arrogance, among many other nasty traits. Did you read about the New York Times illegaly
"editing" facts in Wikipedia to further their leftist agenda?
from china ,the same discuss
from china ,the same discuss。这个周末,《洛杉矶时报》的一则评论文章再次将Google news刚刚推出的新闻评论内容推向了讨论的焦点。很凑巧,刚刚过去的一周里,我、郑昀、郑治、方军,还有IwfWcf,也进行了一场类似的讨论。我前后看了下,发现,其实我们讨论的本质是一个问题,就是如何去发现新闻聚合的价值,当然,这是我总结的,有不同意见,希望大家给我补充。
http://www.caozenghui.cn/?p=210
Is Google Stealing?
While the commenting feature may indeed be quite useful is it right for Google to use content generated and paid for by others any way it sees fit? It's one thing to generate search results (which ultimately send users to the individual sites and help Google build its search, advertising and portal business). It's quite another to use that content to create whole new products and services; services that rip off the content from others and move the center of gravity away from the content providers and undercut their content business.
While some may be excited to take down big media a notch and for the potential for new checks on the power of the media, there are broader implications and risks over the medium and long term. And questions of fairness and property and copyright as well.
Post new comment