WebProNews

Your point that discerning what catches is intuitive is entirely true. On the one hand, when TV execs get together to green-light new shows for the fall line-up, they measure market data on what genres, actors, themes, etc. are being successful. But on the other hand, market data can only go so far - it's nearly impossible to use market data to evaluate a TV show's actor performances, directing, and writing to determine if it will catch on. Only a person with an aptitude for intuitively identifying hits can really judge that with any sort of consistency. That is why you see the same names attached to all the hit TV shows (J.J. Abrams, for example).

On a different note, your error was in reference to Shrodinger's Cat. That particular thought experiment is more about quantum entanglement and uncertainty than the observer effect. I would have used Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle for your example. Interestingly, Wikipedia tells me that even that is not correct for the situation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect

You tube seems to be the one of the best way to do free video campaign about the business, products and services. Secondly youtube videos gains top results in Google Search. But the disadvantage is tracking the visitors from youtube. Daily 1000 times of news visitors coming to youtube. Youtube has twin advantage.

* Youtube is itself is a high traffic generating website
* more chances of visibility from Google Search