| WebProNews

Text:

| Print

| Share:

CommentMonday, May 14, 2007

Cutts (Finally) Answers Paid Link Questions

3 Comments

By Guest (WPN reader) - Sun, 07/13/2008 - 14:17

Free links

No need to pay for links. Add a link for free. Click here.

By Christian (WPN reader) - Mon, 05/14/2007 - 17:22

I'm still detecting B.S. on the shoe, here. Those who practice proper SEO, or design sites without an SEO ability for the sake of best interest of a visitor, still battle enormous faults in the algorithms without worrying about this. All these faults just make a white hat noble effort even more cloudy, and more apt to mistakes/confusion/chaos; this is what drives relevancy crazy. You want to be the the Government - Police the bad guys yourself, and start promoting the noble ones without burying them in your algorithmic excuses.

By Web Master (WPN reader) - Mon, 05/14/2007 - 22:17

Google Advertising

Google is trying to become monopoly of advertising market , trying to scare webmasters. What about Google's adsense? It's ok for Google to sell links as it doesn't alter page rank. Now tell that to Google when they accuse your website of selling links. Matt Cutt your an idiot! I hope this crapp blows your job out of the water. Out with my google search for sure. I have had it with Google and Matt Cutt.