| Advertisement |
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Gray Areas of FTC Guidelines
Although the FTC's new advertising guidelines are scheduled to go... -

Increase Your Conversions with New Tool
According to Tim Ash, President and CEO of SiteTuners, landing page... -

Avoiding Information Overload
Although it originated as a search engine for blogs and microblogs,...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising












3 Comments
What they really hate is
What they really hate is when you say, "I googled it on Yahoo®."
That's pretty much it.
They don't want google to be synonymous with search that takes place on sites that aren't named Google.
Google losing trademark status
Quite right, and well-observed. What happened to Kleenex (and nearly happened to Coke) is about to happen to Google, and there's nothing they can do about it.
However, there is a mitigating factor at work that Kleenex did not enjoy. Google is also part of the name of a number of other Google applications, such as Google Mail, Google Ads, Google Desktop, etc. Going generic would hurt Google if it were only a search engine. But with all it has going on, is 'going generic' really going to hurt the company's ability to trademark itself? Probably not. Although "Xerox' and 'Klenex' are now verbs, you still cannot market your product using those names (unless you ARE Xerox or Kleenex). No one else can market their product as "Google" anything.
These days, it seems like less of a handicap for a trademarked name to go generic. Indeed, it's seeming increasingly like a goal, to me.
Post new comment