iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
CommentTuesday, May 1, 2007

Forbes Finds SEO Red Light District

17 Comments

Leverage on Google Search

Why don't you just use google and leverage on them for your own benefit. Instead of blaming google just because it not work like you want it to be.

Just follow their rules and rides on them to your benefits. There are many way to rides on the search results pages both on the right and on the left.

You just need to learn the rope and it would give unfair advantages to you. :=)

http://www.squidoo.com/google-cash-detective-software-suite

SEO Red Light District

Another sensational headline.

SEO Red Light District

Another sensational headline too confuse an otherwise non-issue.

sensational

I thought it was a pretty good headline, too. Thanks for mentioning it.

Thanks, also, for taking the time to comment on the non-issue. Commenting on non-existence is always risky -- very heady stuff the masses have trouble with.  Borges would be proud.

Cheers.

Google Hell

It's been a problem for a number of years being refered to as the google tickle,google hiccup,google slap then the google stomp now google hell. I tried to comply and follow the rules but to no avail. As an affiliate marketer I'm fighting mad and have switched to web 2.0 and not looking back!!

http://www.squidoo.com/onlinegoldmine

*snicker*

nothing like the ol' Google slap and tickle

 

 

Once again, A BS Article

I get tired of seeing these articles..

I run an SEO Firm and I launched a personal web site offering a certain type of hosting. I just bought the domains a month ago, just launched the site a week ago and listed with the search engines two days ago..

I already have Top 10 positions in Google, Yahoo, Msn and many other search engines.

Seo's need to quit blaming search engines because they simply can't provide the proper service.. Forbe's will BooHoo about Google, They should BooHoo about the SEO company who did the work.

Forbes

You might want to read the article again. Forbes is not as you say "boo-hooing" about Google. This is meant to be a informative article and if you run a SEO firm then you should be thrilled that an SEO article ended up on the front page of Forbes.com today - it may get you a new client.

wow

what's the URL? let's see...

Google Search is really a Hell

Google and their stupidty of indexing based linking is a total mess makes no sense and I think it is the root cause of all the mess which is happening now. If Google thinks Supplemental Index is correct they should have first purged their own Google groups listing.

Each website has their own unique nature. Instead of identifying and making algorithm to study that website, Google really attempts to find is some one else find it useful.

There are 100s of logical ways to make the search index better than what they are doing now and begging to people say certain html syntax keywords to be included in their page.

Just don't even listen to what Google people saying.

I could spend some more money and place a tv media or paper media ad and get people than spending the time in researching what Google has to offer for us.

Really Internet is not Search Engine, they are just a piece of entity, They will be more evolutions to handle these stupidity.

Google Hell but...

It seems to us that those of us who are honestly working hard at our business and using white hat tactics are still losing to the black hatted SEO's as well as to those affilate companies.

Case in Point:

Do a search for Website Hosting, Hosting or Web Hosting. You will notice that almost all the top 20's are people who are affiliates of other companies...ie website hosting directory and those with dashes between their names.

They still have 30,000 links pointing into their websites, but they are not penalized, only small companies does the Big G, mess with. It is very difficult to get 200 links more or less 30,000

I took a look at some of their links, and you can buy them in the Christian Science Monitor for $1000.00 a week. We don't have that kind of money.

Tired of wasting my time with Google.

Uncontented

To Hell with Google

True

Google's created something that's growing out of containment. This is a great reason why the algorithms just aren't cutting it, and maybe more manual jobs could help. Even a 10% improvement is an improvement.

Something for Dynamic Website owners to think about

More than one of those articles you pointed at stated that duplicate content could be a cause and that we shouldn't "steal" content. But that's not the only way Duplicate Content can end up on a site.

If your site is script generated, you'll want to make sure your web ap isn't putting you into Google Hell.

THIS is the right

THIS is the right URL:
Getting out of Google Hell

SEORedLight

Google keyword term 'richest women'

My site is # 1

Forbes is # 2

It's been this way for over a year now.

Maybe Forbes needs me as the new CEO....or CMO at the least.

Peace

Your site

Wow, your site has a ton of ads on it! You must make $10.00 per month off of it. Good job.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info