iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
CommentMonday, March 19, 2007

Internet Archive V. Shell: The Publicity Aftermath

9 Comments

Internet Archive v. Shell settled

April 25, 2007 - Internet Archive v. Shell settled - Internet Archive, a library of historical Web site content, and Suzanne Shell, author and proprietor of the Web site www.profane-justice.org, jointly announced today the settlement of their lawsuit, which stemmed from the archiving of Ms. Shell’s Web site in Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. full press release at: http://www.knowyourcourts.com/news.htm

you rock

thanks pete!

The Truth Will Set You Free

Although I cannot recall if her home was a "trailer" or not,
You Mean My Picture Could Be True??
I take offense at scurrilous and lascivious claims that are disrespectful of the truth.
He Cant Even Tell The Truth about The Trailer Shell Lives In What The hey :+}
Whether Shell is a "journalists" or not :+} I Told You So :+}
I Think I Said Enough :+}

Con Artist

I've spent the past week reading through Ms. Shell's webpages and public group. To my surprise, I found she has a degree in computer programming and continually brags about her expertise. This leads me to believe Ms. Shell is nothing but a con artist trying to entrap anyone to make an extra buck. I read through page after page of her vicious attacks. She then claimed she was the victim. Her attack on the "iGeeks" was also blamed on others. It is my opinion this woman has no integrity, suffers from multiple personality disorder and should be escorted to the nearest padded cell. Her webpages and group should be shut down for TOS violations as a service to humanity.

sHelScammer

http://www.ppld.org/communityconnections/authors/authors_Download.txt
145|Shell, Suzanne||14053 Eastonville Rd|Elbert|CO|80106||||Freelance Writer, Accountant, Upholsterer, Computer Programmer|BOOK:Profane Justice:A Comprehensive Guide to Asserting Your Parental Rights|Yes||Degree in Computer Programming & Accounting||Lived in Colorado Springs 1975-1978. Returned in 1982. Lived in Elbert County 1991-1996. Now live East of Black Forest.|Roswell, New Mexico|3-7-56

onna Suzanne Ostrum-Strand-Shell

Donna Suzanne Ostrum-Strand-Shell is currently married to a Dennis Gene Shell, who is the epitome of a momma's boy. Donna and Dennis live in his daddy's trailer on a crappy chicken farm in Colorado. They still live with his parents.
Allegedly, Dennis sought greener pastures in the arms of another woman awhile back, and has allegedly kindled some more extramarital bonds just recently.

One William O. Tower of Sacramento California sued Donna Suzanne Shell for putting slanderous information about him on her website www.badadvocates.com. Interestingly, she claims that the site isn't hers, even though it is registered in her name, and all email from the online forms goes to her own personal email account.

Donna is a graduate of the Coon Rapids High School. She got knocked up at age 17 which is the alleged reason for her father, a Mr. Donald Ostrum of Minnesota, punching her in the face. She was a high school cheerleader and alleged floozy.

Donna had two sons from her first marriage, which were the subjects of her involvement with Child Protective Services. While it is true that she got CPS off her back with her tactics of bullying, the boys deigned to reside with their father instead. Thus she allegedly never truly retained custody.

She not only allowed, but condoned, her new husband, Dennis Shell, an upholsterer, to beat her child Jacob with a martinet, which is a cat'o'nine tails. Allegedly this whipping left no marks, and resulted in an acquittal for Mr. Shell.

Since then, Ms. Shell has proclaimed herself to be the expert on how to deal with parents falsely accused of Child Abuse and Neglect. However, her longstanding ability to alienate others who refused to kowtow to her leadership has earned her relentless scorn and ridicule from usenet groups and other areas of the vast internet. Truth be told, her tactics of bullying lawyers guardian at litem (LGALs), CPS caseworkers, judges, and other officials, have only caused woe to her cases and clients rather than weal.

While other groups emerged to combat the false allegations of child abuse and neglect rampant in the United States, Ms. Shell has done everything within her power to discredit, disparage, and disenfranchise those people who worked hard to make a difference in their respective communities. Particularly those who disagreed with her.

Claiming to be a journalist, Ms. Shell, who actually does possess some published works of dubious quality, chose to create what would later be known as the "Bad Advocate List" (BAL). This BAL's purpose was to slander and malign any of her competitors in the Child Protection Reform "Industry". Despite most of her claims, very few of the people on her BAL actually charge any money for their advocacy/activism work. This BAL can be found at the same place mentioned above.

Ms. Shell then tangled with a man by the name of Billy Wiseman, who really is a journalist. His website may be found at www.thetruthistold.com.

Every single person on her Bad Advocate List had not been contacted by her prior to their inclusion on the list, to show their side of the story. Most of her allegations involve some sort of sexual impropriety, such as a California man being a child molester, a Michigan pastor having an affair, and an Illinois woman being a strip club dancer. Also, most of her BAL entries are men, as she has a victim complex and hates men.

To fully relay the details of this poor, sick woman would take as many pages as her huge book of dubious value, "Profane Justice". Let it suffice to say that it shouldn't take a judge long to realize what a scam artist she is, and rule accordingly. However, she is a force to be pitied, not feared, and her evil shenannigans under the auspices of Christianity should not be taken seriously.

Shell

This comment is bullshit and defamatory on it's face. I am not part of Shell's family rights movement (or whatever it's called) and I do not agree with particular aspects of her approach to advocacy and activism (but, of course, that's my personal preference, which I am entitled to). However, I take offense at scurrilous and lascivious claims that are disrespectful of the truth.
I have met Suzanne Shell in her home in 2004 or 2005 and my wife and I found her to be hospitable, warm and industrious. Although I cannot recall if her home was a "trailer" or not, I do know that she raises chickens, turkeys and some other type[s] of fowl. I also know that there were no parents living there with her.
I have no knowledge of her "bad advocates list" and, generally, find it deplorable that such in-fighting exists within a movement that is in desperate need for funding, organization and solidarity. Whether Shell is a "journalists" or not is completely subjective and whether her written works are scholarly or not I cannot say (because I have read none).
The poster's allegations, which address purported incidents of a highly personal nature dating back to Shell's childhood and, which are based on purported personal knowledge of her intimate marital relationship, are indicative that the poster has an ax to grind and is not credible. Moreover, it is highly improbable that anyone could have such inside information to make such claims. Finally, the fact that someone would post such claims of such a highly personal nature is probative of the poster's vitriol and hatred for this woman.
In closing, a poignant and telltale sign that this poster's claims are without merit is his or her allegation that Shell's limited successes, if any, are attributable to, "her tactics of bullying lawyers guardian at litem (LGALs), CPS caseworkers, judges, and other officials." Everyone knows (or reasonably ought to know) that lawyers, CPS caseworkers and judges cannot be "bullied" by a lone chicken farmer.

Shell

Ms. Shell would have the backing of many if it were not for badadvocates.com, her own inspiration, if it were not for the fact that "The poster's allegations, which address purported incidents of a highly personal nature dating back to [their] childhood[s] and, which are based on purported personal knowledge of [their] intimate marital relationship[s], are indicative that the poster has an ax to grind and is not credible. Moreover, it is highly improbable that anyone could have such inside information to make such claims. Finally, the fact that someone would post such claims of such a highly personal nature is probative of the poster's vitriol and hatred for [these [people]."

Suzanne Shell

shell has a degree in computer programming. She left out the robot.txt on purpose she also owns http://badadvocates.com/
just to show what kind of person she is...
my site is
http://www.thetruthistold.com/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info