Quantcast

Network Solutions Suit Clarified

Lawfirm accuses NetSol of price-fixing

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:
[ Technology]

The information below also appeared as an update to an earlier article about the class-action lawsuit against Network Solutions filed by Kabateck Brown Kellner.

[Brian] Kabateck said it was unclear how many plaintiffs would ultimately particapate in the lawsuit and therefore damages sought at this point are unknown. He estimates, though, that the number of plaintiffs is potentially in the thousands, and that the suit will seek a refund of about $25 per plaintiff, or the amount they allegedly were overcharged.

"In our mind, this is a very subtle form of price-fixing," he said. "People don’t know how long the domain is going to be held up for, and people are going to be scared into paying a higher price now. They should have notified the customer. People should know they have other options." 

As to why ICANN was brought into the suit and how much he felt ICANN was liable for, Kabateck said the suit was not seeking monetary damages from ICANN. "It’s not so much that they have monetary liability. We simply want a declaration that they can’t set the rules for how long you can or can’t lock up domain names." 

When asked who should set the rules for that, Kabateck said that should be the government’s responsibility. 

Though ICANN is a quasi-independent nonprofit organization, it was established by the US Dept. of Commerce to act on behalf of the government. Though the United Nations has pressured its cause that ICANN be placed under UN control, the contract between ICANN and the US was extended until 2011. Nevertheless, some argue ICANN lacks the authority to decide domain policy.

Kabateck says ICANN lacks such authority and also denies that ICANN is a government body.

 

Network Solutions Suit Clarified
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://www.blogcontentprovider.com Chris McElroy

    I’d love to hear what people think about the 5 day grace period and how it is abused by domain tasters. It’s not about the money. It’s about the fact there are millions of domain names being held as unavailable because of companies, not just NetSol, abusing the 5 day grace period.

    With some domain tasters, Guy 1 registers the name for 5 days. Guy 2 who knows guy 1, picks it up for 5 more days, then Guy 3 who knows them both picks it up for 5 days, etc. They never pay for the domain name.

    I find nothing wrong with domain speculation where someone registers a name with the hope of selling it for a profit. They at least paid for the domain name registration and have a legitimate interest in the name.

    There were more than 260 million domain names tasted and dropped during the grace period in the last 6 months according to some sources. I don’t know how accurate that is, but if it is 1% accurate, 2.6 million domain names, it’s way too many domain name being held up from legitimate registrants.

    ICANN has been asked to do something about this and they have waited for years to do so. Now their best solution proposed is to charge 20 cents per domain name dropped during the grace period. That is not stopping domain tasting. That’s declaring that ICANN wants to profit from the practice along with the tasters.

     

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom