Read WebProNews
With Friends!

MasterCard.com (and Visa.com) Taken Down By Wikileaks-Supporting Hackers?

MasterCard Statement Blames "Heavy Traffic"

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 10 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Guest

    It is really pitiful what the news media reaports as “hacking” these days. A DDoS attack is not “hacking the Mastercard website” by any stretch of the imagination. Please quit with the sensationalism already.

  2. Guest

    In a “free” country, this is preposterous. Mastercard is a service and if Americans want to support their freedom of speech, they should stay out of this, or else they have LOST YET ANOTHER CUSTOMER

  3. Guest

    3D Secure is down, Every transaction is timing out.

  4. Guest

    In a typical DDoS attack, a hacker (or, if you prefer, cracker) begins by exploiting a vulnerability in one computer system and making it the DDoS master.

    Read more….. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid14_gci557336,00.html

  5. MrAndrewJ

    Businesses are private organizations who – ideally – have obligations only to themselves, their investors, and their clients. However, that agreement between business and client is at the option of both parties. I hope that I am dealing with business people, and I further hope that you understand this much in your own businesses.

    You do understand that, right? You and your clients both choose to do business with each other voluntarily.

    The attacks on these businesses only adds fuel to my own worst fear. The fear is that that too many hactivists involved are less interested in peace through open information than they are seeking glory and/or empowerment through the destruction of others. Spreading information would have meant taking the time to discuss the matter with the payment processors. Spreading destruction meant heading straight for the DDoS route.

    HOWEVER

    The attacks are reportedly coming from a separate and unaffiliated group. It will be important to still consider the Wikilinks crowd a separate group from the hackers until they speak about the attacks for themselves.

  6. So it’s okay for a criminal organization like Wikileaks to practice “free speech” but it’s NOT okay for a law-abiding company like Mastercard to practice “free speech”?

    In other words, free speech really only belongs to those who are strong enough to break the law, right? That’s a great social value that Wikileaks has brought to our society.

    • MrAndrewJ

      The people behind the attacks act as a faceless collective called “Anonymous”, yet issued a statement proclaiming that they stand for transparency.

      They are attacking from the dark rather than having open discourse as proof that they believe in the open distribution of information.

      The group’s early roots were less harmful forms of troublemaking. Unfortunately as they changed in scope, their methods did not. Causing problems for other is their answer to every grievance. Reason has little to do with it.

  7. Hacking? LOL

    I would hardly call a bunch of fat neckbeards from 4chan hackers.

    They attacked a website essentially by pinging it to death, with enough people anyone can do that. Especially with instructions written on a pastehtml dump telling them how step by step.

    lol’d

  8. I’m thinking about stop using visa/mastercards, but not sure what other company can provide those services. Ultimately, if the establishment dont stop their tyranni we, the people, have to opt out and start using cash (only), again.. Or maybe just trade services amoungs each others.. That would save us a lot of tax also.

    PEACE !!

  9. Yes i believe this comes under the title “Script kiddies”

    Children getting scripts or software to do “Hacking”

    I believe a 16 year old kid has been arrested for this?

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>