Mark Zuckerberg is a Better Writer Than Paul Ceglia

Linguistics expert says Zuck probably didn't write purported Ceglia emails

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

Mark Zuckerberg is a Better Writer Than Paul Ceglia
[ Social Media]

In the case of the guy who says he owns 84% of Facebook, recent developments have come in the form of a motion for expedited discovery. Last week we told you about the “Declaration of Mark Elliot Zuckerberg in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Expedited Discovery,” where the Facebook CEO once again indicated that he did not sign the purported contracts with Paul Ceglia, who claims to own a substantial part of the social network.

The crux of Ceglia’s argument revolves around alleged emails sent by Zuckerberg that entitle him to a large chunk of the company. These emails surfaced in April, many months after Ceglia initially came forward with the claim.

Naturally, the position of Zuckerberg is that the emails aren’t authentic, and that they were faked by Ceglia. As part of the recent motion for expedited discovery, a linguist has filed a supporting declaration that claims the questioned emails were not written by Mark Zuckerberg, and he can prove it with grammar and syntax.

Professor Emeritus and former Linguistics Department Chair at California State University Fresno Gerald McMenamin analyzed the questioned emails provided by Ceglia with actual email writings by Mark Zuckerberg. He compared 11 different “style markers,” various instances of punctuation, spelling and syntax, and came to the conclusion that “it is probable that Mr. Zuckerberg is not the author of the question writings.”

It is important to note that no single marker of these nine differing features is idiosyncratic to these writers. However, these nine contrasting markers constitute a unique set of markers. It would be improbable to find a single writer who simultaneously demonstrates both the questioned set and the known set.

Based on the contrastingly-distinct style markers which the questioned excerpts and the known-Zuckerberg writings demonstrate, as well as the presence of no more than two minimally-significant similarities between [the two], I conclude that the known writings of Mr. Zuckerberg demonstrate a sufficiently significant set of differences vis-a-vis the questioned writings to constitute evidence that Mr. Zuckerberg is not the author of the excerpted question references.

So this leaves a couple of options. First, if the emails are actually from Zuckerberg, it would mean that he is a wildly inconsistent writer. Second, Paul Ceglia, when crafting the fake emails, could have thought that specific idiosyncrasies would make them appear more authentic (incredibly incorrect, if this is the case). Lastly, Paul Ceglia is just a bad writer.

I say this, because the specific differences all have actual Zuckerberg writing properly, with carefully chosen punctuation and word usage. Questionable Zuckerberg writes more haphazardly.

First, the questioned emails have poor apostrophe usage.  For example, they leave out contraction apostrophes in words like “doesnt.”  Possessive apostrophes are also missing, as in words like “parents” when used possessively.  The questioned emails also say “sites” when using it to mean both “site is” and that the site is possessive.  In the known Zuckerberg emails, he properly places all apostrophes.

The questioned emails also have multiple instances of run-on sentences, while the known Zuckerberg writings do not.  The questioned emails also fail to use commas to separate if/then clauses, while the known emails properly use this comma 85% of the time.  When it comes to spelling and capitalization, the questioned emails say “back end,” “internet” and “can not.”  The known Zuckerberg emails say “backend,” “Internet” and “cannot.”

Other differences include sentence opening words – the questioned emails use a completely different and more formal set like “Further,” “Additionally” and “Thus.”  Zuck’s real emails begin sentences with “Okay” and “Anyhow.”

Among all the differences, there are two similarities, however. Both sets of emails use “Thanks!” as a concluding phrase. Both also begin various sentences with “Sorry.”

Since Ceglia’s entire lawsuit is contingent upon the validity of these emails, this could be a huge blow to it. Putting the actual case aside, this is fun because the word nerd in me just loves a language breakdown and analysis. Plus, it’s interesting to know that Zuckerberg is a very formal email writer. Whoever wrote those disputed emails is not.

Mark Zuckerberg is a Better Writer Than Paul Ceglia
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • newbedave

    Facebook hired a computer forensics firm, a linguistics expert, a document authentication expert and a private detective to battle Ceglia’s allegations. If Ceglia was looking for a quick settlement from Facebook, he may have misjudged his opponent; or is Mark Zuckerberg & his company, Facebook, are just dishonest sociopath scum.

    mark zuckerberg facebook hired a high-profile public relations expert, firm to plant negative stories in major media outlets about its archrival Google; to trying to accuse Google of ‘privacy’ sins. take a lie detector test zuck . all that paul ceglia has to do is take a lie detector test .
    the winklevoss had to take the settlement; zuck new the idea facebook was not the winklevoss idea; and the winklevoss new that mark zuckerberg stole the idea facebook!!…….. BUT FROM WHO

    WINKLEVOSS BS. none of it was their idea, why did FB give them 65 million? That isn’t exactly hush money its fraud and extortion .the WINKLEVOSS new that zuckerberg stole the idea facebook and fb was not there idea or zuck
    In the high-powered atmosphere of Harvard, it wasn’t any trouble for Zuckerberg to steal the idea facebook and probably to the cheers of his professors and classmates DUSTIN+ CHRIS +CAMERON AND TAYLOR WINKLEVOSS AND CHICKENS; PIGS AND GOATS

    Aaron Greenspan says that while he was a student at Harvard, he came up with the idea for Facebook, piss of .
    need to be charged with criminal fraud in connection with facebook; you now how MZ stole the idea facebook !
    You can’t isolate some things you like about the internet, and control other things you don’t like zuckerberg

  • http://eporner.com Amazed

    Wow, you really are a dipshit.

    • http://eporner.com Amazed

      (That’s directed to both the author and the commenter above.)

      • http://www.ientry.com/ Josh Wolford

        good one.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom