Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google Sets Record Straight on Page Speed as Ranking Factor

How Important is the Speed of Your Site?

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 53 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Guest

    hello, google should marketing weblog and can help me,

  2. It seems pretty sensible to penalise slow websites just as humans do by clicking off to another website.

  3. The easier it is for the SE crawlers to identify and index pages the more rewards they heap on a page. Google’s mission “To index all the world’s information”, they reward sites for making their job easier; only stands to reason.

  4. Thanks for the article and latest on the Google page download speed saga. Unfortunately a lot of my sites arewordpresswhich was really giving me a headache overcoming there poor download speed which is due to the build used in most cases. I also came to the conclusion that I preferred to give good content and “user experience” rather than screwing up my sites by trying to download faster. Having said this I have now gotten used to using “Yslow” and “page speed” so the whole exercise was definitely worthwhile.
    Keep up these good articles….

    • WordPress sites are often very slow to load it seems, there are a couple of Gzip plugins however, that do speed them up slightly.

      I have ditched wordpress now having seen my site slide in the results.

      Having a good user experience and quality content is the way it should be, but if people cant find your site because it’s crashed in the rankings, it don’t help much.

  5. I agree with making your site easy friendly, laser focus content, and quick site load.

    • Guest

      I really like that post re: proof that speeding up your websites helps- it validates our experience.

      We found that page speed had a significant impact on search engine rankings when we started to optimize our site for performance a few months ago. I believe it might be at least 10% perhaps higher as we tried to control our experiment and not change our content (just the speed). The ranking system is complex for a reason- many factor should influence placement, including performance IMHO.

      We are a top 3000 ecommerce site- our experiments with speed demonstrated that the benefit was SEO related but more significantly business KPI related (conversion rates, pages/visit, bounce rate etc…). Once we saw this connection we looked around for off the shelf solutions as we found the process very expensive, time consuming and repetitive (like paiting the golden gate bridge- once we finished we had to start again with new code revs, new browser etc…). Our seach is not complete but we have looked at Strangeloop Networks and the F5 Web Accelerator.

      Many great resources exist on these topics: I have always found the stuff from Steve Souders http://www.stevesouders.com to be very helpful. I would also highly recommend the Velocity conference (http://en.oreilly.com/velocity2010).

  6. I would take issue with the claim that page speed doesn’t affect rankings these days. I have several sites, one consistantly ranked within the top 3 results on page 1 for many of it’s keywords over the last 12 months. Since mid-january however it has lost it’s PR of 2 and slumped to page 2 of the results for no obvious reason, Google labs however says the site takes 3-4 seconds to load but continual checking with many tools such as Free Website Speed Test all say it takes between 1 and 1.5 seconds to load.

    It’s my personal feeling that either this is more google mis-information, or quite simply Mr Cutts isn’t as clued up or knowledgeable about googles algorithm and how it

      really

    works and ranks sites as he thinks he is.

    Nice article by the way Chris.

  7. oh joy, googles off on another mission to prat webmasters about!

    The bottom line is that fast loading sites could just as easily be sites with very little to merit visiting them in the first place, And irrelevent garbage delivered quickly is of as little interest as irrelevent garbage delivered a second or so slower.

    will sites that have been ranked/boosted in serp’s due to page load speed, be easily identifiable? maybe with a note or a star beside them? i ask because if they didn’t (or aren’t capable of) attain that position naturally without speed being a factor, i would question whether or not i want my time wasted visiting a site that may be of lower quality, relevence etc than the one below it in the serps.

  8. there is something doesn’t seem to be being discussed in the whole page speed fiasco…

    Everything i have read about this page load speed thing states that the data is taken from computers using the Google toolbar with PR Tool enabled and is the time it takes from clicking the link to your site to when the page is fully loaded on their screen.

    So that means while i’m zipping about on the internet with my super quick broadband cable connection and hi speed computer, i’m very possibly helping someones site rank higher…

    Meanwhile someone could be sat miles from a telephone exchange, on a slow dial up connection with an old 486 computer merrily killing my site in serps, while his connection and computer take a millenium to load my page.

    I guess all that is left to ask is, what do you do for an encore Mr Matt Cutts? neutron bomb juggling maybe?

  9. I don’t think that anyone ever thought that Google will take speed over relevancy. What everyone was talking about is that more emphasis will be put on speed than it was before. Like the rest of the factors in the algorithm, it will just be one small part of it. For example, having great page titles can help you rank, but a great page title alone won’t get you to the number one spot if your content isn’t relevant.

    Whenever people talk about ranking factors, relevancy will always be king. Search engines are attempting to provide users with the most relevant results. Period. To think that any other factor ever will be more important than relevancy is just silly IMHO.

  10. Thanks for the update on google’s Matt cutt interview. Its going to be really helpful

  11. Oho i hope this is not a main reason for the Ranking. What about Usebility or Content;(

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>