Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Can You “Rank” in Google if Everyone Has Different Search Results?

Google Extends Personalized Search, Adds Real-Time Results

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 62 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. this idea is totally sucks .. google are doing this for their own adward service .. fully selfish program

  2. James113

    Since it is an opt-out feature, I would bet that it will cause a lot of users to start using Bing. I think Google is forgetting one major thing. “Not everyone has there own personal computer” The majority of the people in this horrible economy are sharing a computer with someone else or several people within the household.

    Why would someone continually use a search engine that is serving up results based on what someone else in the house might seem to prefer. The third time I use google to search for “corvette”, and the results contain a bunch of sites selling the latest version of Barbies latest ride made by Mattel because my daughter has been searching for Barbie toys, I will be switching to Bing.

    • Guest

      wow, do you think Bing will be better? That’s news to me. Very interesting

      • Bing may be better for a while or maybe Yahoo! but all three are controlled by major Corporations. Why not support an independent search engine like http://DuckDuckGo.com or http://Zuula.com instead? You can even talk to their developers and unlike the big three they actually listen.

  3. If Google set the standard for this method of searching, will other’s follow or come up with other similar strategies. It is becoming a more difficult process to manage a first page position as it is.

    Please keep us informed on this issue.

  4. SEO webmasters and Google searchers have a different view on using Google.

    As you say yourself, you use Google search also for sites that you already know about and visit frequently. Instead of a bookmark, users use Google Search. If Google shows them in a prominent location in SERPs due to personalized search, it makes your life easier.
    This is different from a search where you do not know already where you want to go. Again Google will show sites you frequent more often prominently.
    BUT THIS JUST REFLECTS “NORMAL” USER BEHAVIOUR. So personalized search just manifests what is already going on.

    Webmasters search for single or short keyword phrases to determine ranking. It is impossible to research ALL actually used search phrases.

    The task for SEO is to optimize for long tail keywords and try to get as many actual searches as possible. This gives you an opportunity to rank high in many searches.

    Google is trying very hard to provide users with RELEVANT RESULTS and will sacrifice revenue for this! This is obvious when more successful ads/sites rank higher in Adwords although they bid less than others. If Google would sacrifice relevance for revenue, users will turn away in hordes.

    What I wonder about (and need to test) is how personalized search changes ranking checks by webmasters. If Google believes we favor our own sites (because we search for them often) ranking tools might give us incorrect results.

    Just like in real life we need to try and win the users over to visit our site(s) instead of the ones they usually prefer. And if we are relevant for what they are searching for, personalized search will not impact our business much. If users like us, we will benefit a lot.

    Thomas
    http://gaidaphotos.com
    http://weihnachten-neu.org

    • The problem is that most people do not know how to use preferences therefore they will get the same old results whether they like it or not. Like you mentioned, I often search for ranking of my own sites and find them in unrealistic positions because google is predicting what I am searching for. If I was a “normal” user this feature would restrict the extent of my search by throwing up the same old results. Why would I be continually searching those key words if I had found what I was looking for. I imagine the people at google are a smart bunch but perhaps they can’t see the wood for the trees as often happens when a group of experts get together. Most people who use technology do so at the most basic level simply because we live in the age of information overload. It seems like every internet tool or site has 1001 preferences and who has the time or inclination to keep up with it all. Their is an old adage KISS “Keep It Simple Stupid”

    • Guest

      I guess, if google messes it up too much, I’ll just skip to page 5 of search results (but I’m looking at this from the point of view of a clicking fool shopper). I am also a novice content writer and I’m not sure if it’s going to freeek me up or help me.

      The changes at google will help long term (stale) writers who say the same thing over and over and are not all that bright.
      It will help big box stores (ick).

      I do hope they find a way to do this without doing what I am afraid that Bing is doing. And, I live near MSFT and my housing values are related to MSFT doing well. I hope Bing goes the way of Bob. I hope Google stays as good old google!

      Is someone trying to justify their job at google by coming out with a “new improved” product when the old google (current google) is the greatest thing in the Galaxy?

  5. If Google is gonna show the results on the basis of users last behavior then the essence of search would be lost. One searches in Google when he or she is not aware where to look that stuff for. If one has a preference for a particular website, he can search using website name, why he needs a generic search

    • I agree with you bhawna garg. People use search engines when they don’t know where to find relative information on particular key words. If they have already visited a particular site and are still using a search rather than a bookmark then surely they are looking for new information. OK perhaps two or three searches may be due to forgetting to bookmark a particular site but any more than that is simply defeating the purpose of continual searches on the same key words. I would imagine if people keep getting the same results they may change search engine.

      • Roger J.

        I agree. MOST of the time you’re searching on Google it’s because you’re looking for NEW information so you’re clicking all around. So many of the sites I’m clicking will not even be relevant to my search. So why do I want Google to start showing those sites on page one?? How will they know what site I clicked on is most relevant and important to me?? I think this is a bad idea all around. Personalized search is fine if you are logged in and you use the ‘promote’ button, but other than that, leave it alone.

  6. IMO this will hurts AdWords revenue. If people find what they are looking for in the natural search results, why would they click an advert? Most people know that the adverts lead to sites that aren’t relevant (most times, as if they were relevant they would be in the natural search results.

    The only reason AdWords have traditional drawn the small amount of clicks that they have drawn is because the natural search results on Google were so poor. since they recently devalued (partially) IBL’s and increased their relevancy, we’ve seen traffic go up and AdWords costs go down.

    The reason for these changes is probably because of Bing. But bing is already starting to screw with their listings by making them too commercial. Bing isn’t so bad yet, but it’s Microsoft, you know they will.

    When they do, look for Google to do something to make their SERP’s less relevant so to increase their AdWords revenue.

    • Guest

      You’re missing the point. Google will make MORE money on adwords now because companies will have a more difficult time gaining that page on visibility on the natural results…therefore more companies will look to Adwords to get that ‘guaranteed’ exposure. I’m sure Google knows what they’re doing and they realize that this will increase their Adwords revenue.

    • Guest

      I agree with the post: why would people click on ads when they’ve already found their product. Absolutely! I was just thinking of it from my own point of view

  7. While the news of yet another major change in the Google algorithm conjures dire thoughts of murder (Google) or suicide (webmaster), it doesn’t mean there’s no hope. I believe that tried and true methods will still prevail.

    Build a great page with informative content, proper title & meta data, researched keyphrases, and H tags. Syndicate the page via bookmarking, articles, and/or Press Releases. Lather, rinse, and repeat. Give your site more chances to be found with fresh, new, and relevant content and your site will weather the storm.

  8. Anything that may potentially infringe on another persons privacy should be an opt-in deal only, that’s common sense, ethics, and the neighbour principal in action. Guess Google is more interested in bumping it’s shares than being just.

  9. Guest

    I have a web site and I also use the Internet to do research and to buy things. This note is from the shopper.

    I use the internet to learn and to research items that I want to purchase and simultaneously I determine which vendor offers the best value for that purchase. Since I am a webmaster I know that the most highly rated products and retailers will be on the first pages of the organic listings. If the Google search engine modifies my search results based on where I

    • John

      Personalized search results based on history are closer to bookmarks than to a real search. If I’m looking for new information or alternative product sources, personalized search results will only make Google less useful.

  10. I the think the problem is your SEO campaign in need of a boost? It’s happened to every marketer — we grow occupied with other matters of urgency and our SEO and other marketing campaigns begin to fall behind. Don’t worry, it’s not a permanent state. You can let your SEO fall behind a little and get back to it with a rejuvenation campaign, but it has a tendency to be heavy on the pocket and hard on the website. Sure, you’ll get back up to the top, but you’ll spend your way thin getting there.

  11. Guest

    I think that this change to “personal relevancy” or whatever they call it is terrible for most people. It’s a barrier to entry. Read about economics – google folks.

    The sites with tons of hits, like Walmart (ick) or Amazon (yay) are going to stomp the little guy (or gal)… though I agree with the guy in the article. We will find a way around any changes that are made by google.

    I would prefer to have my choices in a search made by ME not some robot spider thing (technical term). I don’t mind going in 50 pages deep, but I’d like to find my own info, my own products, and I would prefer to use smaller companies for purchases. I like indie companies and they may be more difficult to find now.

    Just my thoughts. PS I love you google. I saved my own life by googling for weeks until I found something that matched my symptoms and I’m still here! I’d be dead w/o google.

    • Guest

      I agree. The little guys are not going to have a fighting chance. Maybe we should support the ‘little guy’ search engines instead of Google.

      • Yes! Let’s support little guy search engines. I recommend http://DuckDuckGo.com and http://Zuula.com. You can read more about what Google is doing and what their CEO publicly announced about their intention is to “clean up” search and favor brands (read Corporations) at http://www.seobook.com/google-branding.

        If you believe in keeping small businesses viable so we don’t all end up depending on the “company store” made popular in movies about the coal mines and other captive employee/consumer relationships it is time to vote with your actions.

  12. Guest

    ohhhhh your gonna burn in spammer hell for this!!!

  13. Although google would like to increase sales and profits, they also have to focus on their customers. It is hard to see how 1 or 2 websites out of thousands of websites being ranked higher on a keyword would have any negative impact on people searching. I doubt the average person will switch to another search engine as a result of this change, and I am sure google would have conducted focus group research, prior to making such an important move. As a result, other search engines are more likely to follow then to buck the trend.

    On the other hand, this can have a huge impact on SEO experts, who are trying to get a site highly ranked, if they can not influence the outcome. I am putting anyone who is doing their own seo work in the same category. If as a side consequence, this will force more companies to spend more on PPC to get the same amount of traffic, well all the better.

    There are ways to counter google’s effect, but these techniques will require a larger investment in organic SEO, making the higher cost of PPC more acceptable.

  14. I am just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on how this affects (if at all) companies that source customers from countries around the world. Is there ways that this functionality could be leveraged, or anything done to turn this into an advantage?

    About all I can think of is trying to encourage repeat visits. If it does in fact rely on the cookie that stores 180 days of usage, my thought is that the more times they have visited your site, the more relevance Google will place on it.

    Am i on the right track here?

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>