Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google’s Matt Cutts Does Some Myth Busting

Will verify legitimacy of blog comments via Twitter

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 4 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. If it really happens will be a problem because it will make our website does not make a good impression in front of search engine google

  2. Audrey

    Some sad characters have too much time on their hands so kudos to handsome Matt Cutts for debunking these time-wasting myths.

    On Digital Point I was spammed with “buy Adwords to get out of Panda” private messages. According to that non-nonsensical theory, targeted traffic lowers the bounce rate for your site. Google would never do such a thing, I trust Matt Cutts.

  3. This is very interesting. However its very absurd in terms of credit cards via adwords is a ranking signal. Tats pretty immature, but i can say its like one type of paid link lol.

    However adwords do play a better role in terms of traffic via different set of keywords. And if you are talking about ranking, then its not a signal but its like a referral type of traffic via a trusted source. Where google does belive that if you get traffic from trusted sources by google itself then it will give importance, but that doesn’t means that ranking depends on google adwords.

  4. If anything you’d almost expect that if you did buy Adwords ads that your rankings will drop to keep you buying Adwords ads. But I know that’s not true either. What I found interesting about the video response by Matt Cutts was that he said “organic or editorial” when referring to the organic results. I mean you can’t say they are entirely organic if Google can put whatever it wants where it wants for whatever reason it wants. Yes, I know that’s what an algorithm is, but “organic” to me means there is a level playing field for all, which was thrown out of the door the second Google decided to add it’s own website stuff where it wanted to, plus take manual action against sites where it sees fit (instead of fixing the algorithm if it needs to be). Google needs to slow down and take more time to test before they launch something. I just find it hard to believe they do their due diligence with all the algorithm changes they claim they do every year. Not to mention that Google outsources it’s QA to companies who then outsource that job to other people. So it’s a contractor of a contractor doing the job. It’s funny how to be hired for a position at Google you have to go through all these interviews and testing before they’re hire you, but an important job of QA is basically outsourced to companies that outsource to others. I wonder how many interviews the QA people go on for Google to insure they are the right people to be doing QA testing in the first place.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>