Have you heard about the latest "sport" in dirty online business? It's called Google Bowling and it represents a gaping flaw in Google's system that allows your competitors to sabotage your site to the point of getting it banned or penalized.
This can't happen, right? I mean, Google would have us believe their algorithms are not easily manipulated and that your rankings are safely under your (and their) control. But in fact there's a chink in Google's armor that can have massive consequences for any web business unfortunate enough to have aggressive and unethical competitors.
Here's the loophole, explained
It all began with Google's aggressive attempts to curb link popularity manipulation by penalizing sites that purchase site- wide text link ads to get lots of incoming links in a hurry. (eg: If the ad selling site had 1,000 pages, the advertiser's link would instantly be on 1,000 pages.)
Google began filtering sites that indulged in this kind of linkage and either penalized or flat-out removed the site from its database. Bad news for that business. Excellent news for their competition. Can you guess what's coming next?
Certain scoundrels began thinking: "If buying site-wide text link ads en masse will get my site into hot water with Google, why not buy them for my competitor's site instead? Then just sit back and wait for Google to solve my number one business headache... the competition." (Cue evil laughter sound track.)
This, ladies and gentlemen, is Google Bowling. Simple. Devious. Devastating. And not just in theory; it's really happening out there.
Here at eTrafficJams.com, we are hearing from a lot of businesses whose sites once enjoyed great rankings (ours included) and now don't even show up in Google for their own company name.
A small loophole has turned into a devastating black hole, sucking in and wiping out countless quality websites in the process. And it just may be their competitors sending them into the abyss.
Is your head spinning yet? I mean, it was bad enough knowing that with every Google update, your business may go up or down in the rankings depending on the whims of the Google geeks. But now add into the mix the fact that your competitors also have a hand in your search engine health and wellness... well, Houston, we have a problem.
Although this would be a fortuitous time for me to suggest that the solution to this problem is hiring a reputable SEO firm (like www.eTrafficJams.com) to watch over your rankings, I shall resist the temptation. Instead, I'd like to offer Google - as if they're listening - a simple solution to this nasty problem.
Right now, Google hands out either rewards or harsh penalties for linking strategies - good rankings to reward good linking techniques, and penalties, such as the now-infamous sandbox, to punish un-cool, manipulative linking practices. But there isn't any middle ground.
I say why not create a neutral response... a filter that simply ignores questionable links, neither rewarding nor punishing them?
1) Innocent victims of Google Bowling don't get hurt.
2) If the dubious links actually were perpetrated by the business at the receiving end of them, Google would exclude those links and the site would gain nothing. It would simply be throwing ad money out the window (unless, of course, it was buying site-wide ads in vehicles that generated relevant traffic). And
3) Google's reputation for delivering accurate and fair search results would be restored.
Google needs to do something soon to plug this loophole, not just for the immediate relief of its users but for its own credibility
Although being "Google Bowled" by a competitor and having your site removed from the database could ruin a small business, the consequences for Google could be just as dire. If chatter picks up that Google's results are easy to manipulate and consequently inaccurate, users may be scared away to other search engines.
Fewer users = fewer clicks on ads = lower revenues. Well, I don't have to spell that out for the financial wizards at Google.
But just think: a few stories on the big TV networks, say on MSNBC (*cough* think Bill Gates' MSN Search, a major Google competitor), revealing how the new sport of Google Bowling is sweeping the nation... well, the average user at home may start to have doubts about Google and maybe decide to try out Yahoo! or MSN Search.
Is it really that far-fetched to speculate that someone like oh, I don't know, Mr. Gates, might take advantage of this situation to solve his number one business headache... the competition?
So I suggest a simple solution to Google's link bowling problem: neutralize suspicious links so they are neither helpful nor harmful. Problem solved. Sorry, Mr. Gates. 2005, Michael Pedone
Michael Pedone is the President / CEO of eTrafficJams.com, a search engine optimization and website marketing company <http://www.etrafficjams.com located in Clearwater, Florida that specializes in getting targeted, eager-to-buy traffic to your site. You can catch him blogging at: <http://www.etrafficjams.com/blog/.
About the author:
Michael Pedone is the President / CEO of eTrafficJams.com, a search engine optimization and website marketing company <
http://www.etrafficjams.com> located in Clearwater, Florida that specializes in getting targeted, eager-to-buy traffic to your site. You can catch him blogging at: <
http://www.etrafficjams.com/blog/>.
Comments
Very much so!
Indeed, what you said is very much scary. I would like to see Google not counting the suscicious links. Even I had the same fear when the announcement came that paid links and sitewide links may get penalty. That's quite unfair and very much deplorable.
And as you say, crooks are not only in small firms, the large ones have huge amounts of money and any competitor arises against them, they can easily shower hell on them through this manipulative strategy, I guess. Also, by link building to the competitor from wrong neighborhoods like adult sites can be another headache right? I hope Google does as you say.
Lenin Nair
Creative writing blog
link exchange request
ARTEL provides systems for pipette calibration, liquid handler verification and optimization, pipette technique training, certification, training seminars, multichannel pipette calibration integration and automation support for liquid handlers
Google Bowling
I don't think Google Bowling is possible. I have seen no material that states that this will remove you from the search engines or apply a penatly. If anything those links are probably just ignored. I think it would make no sense for google to penalise sites that buy links in. They probably reduce the value of sites that sell links though.
Google Bowling in theory should not be possible.
Even simpler.......why not
Even simpler.......why not implement a tool within webmaster tools that allow a site to tell google to ignore any links that a webmaster wishes!!
Update
For the previous readers, I think Google has already implemented his suggested strategy or something similar. Linking to a 'bad neighbourhood' definitely will affect your rankings, but not getting a link from one. You can control who you are linking to, but not who is linking to you.
Argh
Why hasn't Google done anything about this yet?
Great Idea
That is a great solution... rather than penalizing.. they just don't count sites that are marked as text link sales sites... then this whole google bowling thing would go away...
penalizing for bad links isn't the answer... because anyone can get links to any website.. they should just ignore!!
then inevitably... people would figure out that its a waste of time trying to manipulate the algorithims and focus on making a helpful site lol
So what is left to do?
Great Article
This is a great article. I have written an article called 20 Bad Ideas - Black Hat SEO Practices, at http://btw73.blogspot.com/2007/11/20-bad-ideas-black-hat-seo-practices.h... and linked to this post as a reference. Take a look!
Thanks,
Brian
Valid proof?
SEO theories are often hypotheses. Are there other resources related to the issue? Did Google penalize for site-wide links or those links got penalized because of the irrelevancy to the links?
Linking counter attack is not possible, IMO unless links are exchanged. No one can lower someone's website ranking as far as I know. Rumors and "seemingly-right" theories are rather weak. I just wanted to know if there are any back-up information on this.
James
http://www.xtremelinkbidding.com
Very good article
I think with time Google's business model and algorithm will get bloated which means that there is going to be much more room for problems, issues, failures and so on.
So far Google has been pretty incredible. Their search results have been the best in my opinion, even though at an odd occassion I have managed to find more material with MSN search.
If what you are saying here proves to be true Google will be under major threat, however so far they have proved that they can deal with any issue, especially when it comes to fixing search problems and exploits.
Regards,
Jason Grant
www.flexewebs.com
Isn't it already working?
I thought that Google already does like Michael has advised. Because I was surprised to once find out that Google has a special form to report sites that sell links.
And the first idea that got into my head was - it's a safe way to kill any competitor. And as I am not super-clever, I think the very idea came to Google's 'head' as well.
And the best solution, simply not to count the backlinks from pages that are highly possible to be selling backlinks. It's a lot easier than penalizing anyone.
Nick
http://www.AutoLinkExchanger.com
Post new comment