Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Do You Respect DMOZ After 11 Years?

Are You Listed in the Open Directory Project Yet?

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 279 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. I dont now. It’s ridiculous, what does one have to do in order to get listed? Well, I’ve pretty much just given up on listing there.

  2. Whe have to sarch for another rising star?
    There are always stars, believe me.

  3. Dmoz is of no use in today fast growing internet media.

  4. Respect can be shown through behavior and it can also be felt. We can act in ways which are considered respectful, yet we can also feel respect for someone and feel respected by someone. Because it is possible to act in ways that do not reflect how we really feel, the feeling of respect is more important than the behavior without the feeling. When the feeling is there, the behavior will naturally follow. To understand more about What Is Respect Really Means,visit pdfpal.org for more information.

  5. I get my site in DMOZ directory and still get any traffic fro there. :p

  6. I guess you can say they have good content -links to good sites. But hey have no real relevance in todays world.

  7. DMOZ still earns respect..else we’ll not be here writing about it.

  8. Good post.. Like everyone else, our company has been waiting for a response for about 6 months now.. still nothing. Submitted and just waiting and afraid to resubmit… can’t do anything at all. Hope DMOZ staff can provide better service to their users soon.

  9. I Tried for years to get my website listed, but the moderator has no interest.
    It’s very frustrating, but I managed a top 10 ranking for my major keyword, without the DMOZ ranking. But I think if they would add our site, we would even get a higher PR.

  10. Violin Student

    I’ve tried to get a website listed in DMOZ for several years. More than 700 pages of original content. 40 years experience in my field. No luck. I’ve even tried volunteering to edit categories which relate to my field, and categories where I have expertise but have no web presence. I’ve never been accepted. I still attempt to get listed once every six or eight months, but I’ve never had a single page listed. Naturally, there is no response to inquiries, so I don’t ask questions any more. It’s interesting, though, that numerous websites relating to my field which are simply advertisements and have no actual content are listed. I have a hard time figuring that out.

  11. Guest

    We have been trying (within recommended rules) to get listed for 8 years!! With no joy. Given up as DMOZ seems irrelevant now.

  12. Dmoz could be an incredibly powerful and useful site if it wasn’t full of corrupt, self-serving, and unqualified editors. As far as we’re concerned, Dmoz is dead.

  13. I completely agree with the progress of DMOZ. No longer updating and no longer accepting web site submission as far as I can tell.

    Not sure what they want us to do; we have followed instructions to the letter to get numerous web sites listed.

    My client base is all over the board, the type of client web sites we manage fall under a number of categories

  14. Non so quale sia esattamente la posizione degli altri lettori… dando per scontato che sia una utilissima risorsa in rete, sicuramente esistono altri strumenti altrettanto utili..

  15. Dmoz still gives a lot of weight to Your site, but how the editors decide: I do not know.

    I think they are still important. But they still have technical issues – I still get proxy errors when submitting a new site. They should work on that.

  16. LP

    Dmoz may have been regarded as an authority site. But their service sucks. No reply what so ever. I dun even bother to look at Dmoz after awhile. I am happy to see that they got trample all over by other sites now. Respect and you will be respected.

  17. I have never like Dmoz. I am kind of happy to see that it is loosing its shine. All my submissions have never receive a reply from these damn staff. Not even some courtesy to inform people on the submission result. They dont respect the public, and people will not respect them. Better to see they crash.

  18. DMOZ grew to become a large and respected (in the past) directory due to the fact that it was accepting good submissions in the past. Now they don’t. That’s why their numbers are declining.

    Ah, poor editors, overwhelmed by bad submissions… Well, that’s their job and they took it voluntarily. It is evident that many submissions are being declined because of the cranky attitude or ulterior motives.

    If we just will end up blaming spammers for downfall of DMOZ we will not help it. If DMOZ haven

  19. Poor DMOZ. They’ve been over-run by non-ethical editors (not all of them, but most of them) who like many have said simply “block out their competitors” by either not allowing their competition to be listed, or by blocking editors that may list their competitors.

    It’s so bad, but nothing that’s biased ever lasts long with Google. DMOZ has been dead for sometime, and it’s declining traffic numbers are demonstrative of this. People stopped caring about a DMOZ listing.

    The problem for DMOZ is that most of the editors thought they could just deny sites forever without the internet community at large eventually finding out about what was happening.

    Well now, the cat’s out of the bag. The results are showing (declining traffic volume), and people are getting Top 10 listings on Google frequently without being listed in DMOZ (in fact there is a 98% chance that if you do things properly on site, and get enough inbound links, you can get a Top 10 listing for your keyword).

    So that means DMOZ is starting to slowly lose its reason for existence in the first place. People use directories to find information in a different way than with Search Engines. But as search engines become more modern it is slowly eating away at directory usage at all.

    I have Google Search in my car’s NAV system, even on my PS3 and My Wii. . .I’ve never had a directory search capability in any electronic device, and it’s pretty obvious as to why. The DMOZ search generally doesn’t work well anyway. I end up going to Google to search for what I need.

    The reason why Google is so popular is because for the most part Google has remained neutral on the sites that they index, and the content of those sites. People know that they can rely on Google for a realistic result listing, that isn’t biased (well aside from “safesearch” which is designed to filter listings some may find offensive) for the most part.

    Can the DMOZ say the same thing?? Nope.

    With biased editors, and editors who have “cronny” attitudes (only let my friends in, or let my friends become editors), and less than 1% of all sites that are submitted being listed, DMOZ is on its way to a slow, and quiet death. Websites are what keep the internet alive. Even Google would be dead without anything to index! DMOZ without listing sites, and having the same old stale sites in its directory will only suffer more.

    Google only supports DMOZ for now, until they create their own super directory, which is in the works from what I understand. The same way Google decided to stop working with FireFox after their current contract expires, when they decided to go forward with Chrome (their current contract together expires soon).

    Without Google, DMOZ will die for sure, as it’s MAIN source of respect will disappear.

    The only way AOL can breathe any life back into that beast, is to fire all the editors, and get some PAID editors from their own base of staff. That is how they will insure that listings are accurate, sites actually GET listed regardless of the editors personal opinion, and there will be no biased listings or listing rejections without explanation.

    I have done over 300 clients websites (possibly more) since 2001, and I stopped submitting to the DMOZ altogether back in 2003 when I came across an article that suggested the editors were biased, and rejected competitor sites.

    When I applied to be an editor (in a category that had nothing to do with SEO, or Website Design) for a category I was HIGHLY familiar with (Boy Scouts, something I VOLUNTEER FOR, and have NO INCOME from), and they declined me (even though the category had NO editors at the time), and didn’t explain why, I knew then that something was wrong.

    Since 2003, whenever clients ask me about submitting to the DMOZ, I tell them it’s un-necessary. I explain that DMOZ gets less traffic each year, and that they can easily obtain a Top 10 listing on Google for their keywords on their own without a good amount of inbound links to their site.

    I predict within the next 2-3 years, the DMOZ will die completely. If it doesn’t, it will completely be “gutted” from the inside out, and transformed into something new, and more robust that fits the needs better of today’s modern internet users.

    When you lose your respect on the internet, you’ve already lost the battle.

    The DMOZ turned 11, and no one showed up for the birthday party — some people even through eggs. I think that’s clear evidence that you’ve alienated the very community that created the possibility for you to become as popular as you were. Game over.

  20. Unfortunately Dmoz is run by “your competitors” who have been on the internet longer than you. Or just in the right place at the right time. They don’t want to approve your sites because well, you are their competition so they tend to not list them. Some of you will be lucky enough to get your sites in so it’s worth a try. But many see the problem as their sites don’t get listed.

    Dmoz does still have value even though their traffic has declined.

  21. I too have been trying to list with DMOZ. I have given up!
    Somethings are just not worth stressing about. They practice bad business which is something I would rather not be associated with.

    Alysehia

  22. Guest

    I have tried for several years to get 2 websites listed on DMOZ to no avail. They are of no hope to small businesses and maybe with the offhand approach they seem to take, they are now their comeuppance that the drastic drop in numbers of unique visitors show.
    Am I naive to think that DMOZ were supposed to be helpful or maybe I am living in cloud cuckoo land.

    • Ken Davis

      DMOZ does not exist for Webmasters, their sites or for businesses. It exists to provide a service to Internet users, the business’ clients, if you will.

      It’s always easy to put down what you do not understand, or perhaps MIS-understand. I see a plethora of misunderstanding about DMOZ, its goals and why it exists. It’s no wonder so many Webmasters and site owners are miffed at DMOZ. They just don’t get it. They expect DMOZ to be what they demand of it instead of accepting it for what it

      • DMOZ does not exist for Webmasters, their sites or for businesses. It exists to provide a service to Internet users, the business’ clients, if you will.

        COMMENT: Webmasters represent the business clients, webmasters assist business owners in getting their web site designed as well as assist (businesses) in getting indexed in the search engines, so am not sure why you are discounting the people who do the work for these businesses. Actually I

    • Guest

      DMOZ does not exist for Webmasters, their sites or for businesses. It exists to provide a service to Internet users, the business’ clients, if you will.

      It’s always easy to put down what you do not understand, or perhaps MIS-understand. I see a plethora of misunderstanding about DMOZ, its goals and why it exists. It’s no wonder so many Webmasters and site owners are miffed at DMOZ. They just don’t get it. They expect DMOZ to be what they demand of it instead of accepting it for what it
      is.

  23. Chieftain

    Proxy Error

    The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
    The proxy server could not handle the request POST /cgi-bin/add.cgi.

    Reason: Error reading from remote server

    —-

    Ahaha , the crap is falling apart.

    Sadly almost all web directories look like crap, but dmoz is the dumbest of them. That is the biggest garbage and I’d better list my sites in porn directories, than that, they sure have more traffic.
    Is incredible that such an autdated “site”(!?!?) is still on today. It should be flushed away by some “internet garbage cleaners” cause garbage it is. It don’t even works and is heavily biased, not reliable, outdated, colapsed, exploded and edited by wankers who dream at getting rich from being editors of crap. No more words, that is it, dmoz is garbage.

  24. Maybe some gaint company should go for accquiring ‘DMOZ’ to improve the situation a little bit.

    On the other hand, I think they should have clear policy for approving/denying site submission based on ‘Neutral’ and ‘Fair’ view so which means that if an editor is running his/her own website under whatever niche, he/she should not deny the submitted site just for being a competitve.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>