Quantcast

Digg Speaks About DiggBar and Your Traffic

Reached Out to Google and SEO Experts on Best Practices

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


[ Search]

Last week, Digg released the DiggBar, a toolbar that sits at the top of your browser as you view content from Digg. It frames the content not only with the bar itself, but with a custom Digg URL. The following clip demonstrates what it does if you have not encountered it yet.


DiggBar from Kevin Rose on Vimeo.

Since the DiggBar was introduced, there has been a great amount of concern that Digg has started hoarding all of the traffic for itself. Some experts have come out and played down the concern. Brent Csutoras for example noted it would only increase traffic. He pointed out the additional sharing features (via Twiter, Facebook, and email) and that content would still receive page views, proper clicks for ads, etc.

Such reasoning has still not been enough to convince some people. Digg has now addressed the issue officially in a company blog post. Digg’s John Quinn writes:

Prior to launching the DiggBar, we reached out to Google and SEO experts to ensure we adhered to the leading best practices, as we framed and linked directly to source content via the DiggBar. This process involved gathering feedback from publishers to ensure the execution was as content-provider-friendly as possible. We took several steps to ensure that search engines continue to count the original source, versus registering the DiggBar as new content. We include only links to the source URLs on Digg pages to allow spiders to see the unmodified links to source sites. These links are overwritten to short URLs in JavaScript for users who have this preference.

Quinn says Digg has already launched additional updates this week to further address "search engine juice" concerns. He adds:

We always represent the source URL as the preferred version of the URL to search engines and use the meta noindex tag to keep DiggBar pages out of search indexes. For those of you interested in the technical details, we also include link rel=”canonical” information to indicate that the original URL is the real (canonical) version. Additional URL properties, like PageRank and related signals, are transferred as well. This is recommended by Google, Ask.com, Microsoft and Yahoo!.

Will this information set some minds at ease, or will Digg’s word about its practices not be good enough? One thing’s for certain – Digg is going to keep a lot of eyeballs on it’s own site with the DiggBar as it focuses users’ attention on what else they can find on Digg.

Digg Speaks About DiggBar and Your Traffic


Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://tomuse.com Kevin

    That’s a load of crud from Digg:

    They are effectively stealing traffic, content, and money from publishers:
    http://tomuse.com/digg-diggbar-facebook-content-theft-traffic-money-publisher

    And they are displaying the DiggBar without user consent which is essentially spamming:
    http://tomuse.com/framing-spam-diggbar-facebook-hijacks-web-need-your-help

  • http://www.tjkwebdesign.com TJ Kelly

    Hey, I initially reacted negatively too. I wrote an article calling DiggBar an “SEO-killer.” But, after reading Quinn’s post, and investigating the technical details he describes, I’ve come around.

    It all seems legitimate, and as far as I can tell, Digg is actually not doing any harm in terms of SEO or pageviews.

    I wrote more about the details and implications of the Diggbar on SEO: http://www.tjkwebdesign.com/2009/04/diggbar-not-seo-killer/ Check it out!

    tjk

  • http://linkdirs.blogspot.com/ Eric from SEO Link Directories

    Seems alright to me. After reading what Quin has said about the “canonical” tag I think they are at least giving a backlink to the websites there. But I am still confused about hits, when people will be browsing the impressions will be our’s our Digg’s?

  • Guest

    The only way to get rid of the digg tool bar is to have an account.Which is a terrible way to do business.annoy people into signing up.

    No matter how they spin it,this is a blatant grab to increase their member count so they can charge more for ads.

    And don’t even start on terrible 1990′s look of that bar.I feel like I’m back on xoom or some other free host from back in the day.

  • http://www.doubleplus.com Susan Petracco

    I believe this is a tremendous step forward for Digg users. The ability to share urls with people that basically go right to the content (versus a Digg.com page that only has the link and a blurb) does two things. First of all, it reduces the click that was originally needed to get from the Digg.com page to the site, a click that many users never took. And it also puts the ability to easily digg right from the header of the page (no more looking all over a busy page for a “diggit”), which will encourage more people to digg the story as they read it.

    I feel that the DigBar is a win-win for both Digg.com and their users.

  • http://digg.thupphotos.com/ digg@thupphotos.com

    free digg website allow for thai and en website to promont youwebsite

  • http://www.bookmarkth.com bookmarkth

    free digg website allow for thai and en website to promont youwebsite

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom