In the article it remarks "85 percent of the panel decisions ordered the transfer of the domain names in question to the complainant and 15 percent of the complaints were denied" What it should actually say is 100% of all respondents do not have a valid reason to own the domain name that they are cyber squatting due to the assumed trademark infringement. Of the 100%, 85% don’t fight it and lose and 15% are fighting it and the trademark infringement is arbitrary. With the added cost to fight a domain name infringement in the thousands of dollars the value of the domain name must be immense to warrant that kind of expenditure. If you have been in this position as I have been you will quickly see what your guidelines on keeping the domain name that you have perhaps painstakingly acquired with no intent of “MALICE”. “Great Article Mike “
Cyber Squatting
In the article it remarks "85 percent of the panel decisions ordered the transfer of the domain names in question to the complainant and 15 percent of the complaints were denied" What it should actually say is 100% of all respondents do not have a valid reason to own the domain name that they are cyber squatting due to the assumed trademark infringement. Of the 100%, 85% don’t fight it and lose and 15% are fighting it and the trademark infringement is arbitrary. With the added cost to fight a domain name infringement in the thousands of dollars the value of the domain name must be immense to warrant that kind of expenditure. If you have been in this position as I have been you will quickly see what your guidelines on keeping the domain name that you have perhaps painstakingly acquired with no intent of “MALICE”. “Great Article Mike “