CNN Suspends Roland Martin For Super Bowl Tweets

CNN has suspended commentator Roland Martin after some remarks he Tweeted during the Super Bowl were interpreted as homophobic. CNN issued a statement that read:

“Roland Martin’s tweets were regrettable and offensive. Language that demeans is inconsistent with the values and culture of our organization, and is not tolerated. We have been giving careful consideration to this matter, and Roland will not be appearing on our air for the time being.”

Martin has defended what he said in his Tweets as not being homophobic at all. His comments came immediately after the H&M underwear commercial featuring David Beckham.

Since Martin has not deleted any of the Tweets in question, we can walk through the whole thing in chronological order and see how it played out. First, here is the Beckham ad that ran during the Super Bowl.

Immediately after that, Martin Tweeted:

Ain’t no real bruhs going to H&M to buy some damn David Beckham underwear! #superbowl

— rolandsmartin (@rolandsmartin) February 6, 2012

Followed immediately by:

If a dude at your Super Bowl party is hyped about David Beckham’s H&M underwear ad, smack the ish out of him! #superbowl

— rolandsmartin (@rolandsmartin) February 6, 2012

Here is where things started to go bad for Martin. He was challenged by multiple people on Twitter as to what he meant by the Tweets. Were they homophobic?

@ShelbyKnox @rolandsmartin Hey Roland, why? B/c that might mean they’re gay? @CNNLive fire this homophobe.

— Brian (@briansmith31681) February 6, 2012

Martin responded…

@briansmith31681 @ShelbyKnox @CNNLive no, fool! Look at the underwear! You would be the only fool on my TL to come to that conclusion

— rolandsmartin (@rolandsmartin) February 6, 2012

From here out, Martin tried to explain that his issue was not with a mostly-naked man, or gay men. It was with Beckham being shown in a commercial during the Super Bowl. He went on to remind people that he makes wisecracks about soccer a lot. His assertion was that the Super Bowl (American “football”) was no place to run an ad about soccer (European “football”). His crack was about Beckham the soccer player, not Beckham as a half-naked man.

@onmysoapboxx are you that dumb? I rag on soccer all of the time. David Beckham. Soccer player. Pay the hell attention!

— rolandsmartin (@rolandsmartin) February 6, 2012

@marcslove So when Beckham is in a #superbowl commercial, I crack on him. I always say Americans are into football, not soccer.

— rolandsmartin (@rolandsmartin) February 6, 2012

Martin even made another comment about Piers Morgan that would seem to back his “it was about soccer” defense.

I bet soccer fan @piersmorgan will be in line at H&M in the morning to get his hands on David Bechman’s underwear line! LOL #superbowl

— rolandsmartin (@rolandsmartin) February 6, 2012

And, Piers Morgan responded to him in kind, being jovial and saying nothing about gays.

@rolandsmartin I don’t need all the padding. If you get my drift.

— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) February 6, 2012

Someone else responded to that exchange…

@rolandsmartin @piersmorgan : Oooh. Not nice. .

— Karen Hunter (@karenhunter) February 6, 2012

And, once again, Martin pointed to soccer as the crux of his joke…

@karenhunter @piersmorgan I’m always jacking with Piers about his love of soccer! LOL

— rolandsmartin (@rolandsmartin) February 6, 2012

Flash forward to today. CNN suspends Martin as commentator based on his Tweets. Seems to me like a spineless thing to do. Stand up for the people who work for you if you can tell they are not in the wrong.

This man’s misunderstanding has put Roland Martin’s career in question. This is how an ignorant accusation can get out of hand fast, especially when an organization like CNN refuses to do the right thing. This has nothing whatsoever to do with political ideology. It’s just a matter of decency. Roland Martin explained himself. And, there is at least a whole mountain of reasonable doubt as to whether his statement was interpreted correctly. CNN chose to bow to the invective of ignorant people.

There are 5 Comments. Add Yours.

Justin
February 27, 2012 at 12:36 pm

Another example of getting bashed for having an opinion. He should have that right under the first amendment, but then again, in our modern era of excessive, uber-p.c.ness, this really doesn’t surprise me. For example, I think some people on here are way to wound and uptight and need to lighten up and take the stick out of a very uncomfortable place. I’m sure this will be banned next as well as I for an OPINION. Lighten up jokers.
Joe
February 23, 2012 at 8:54 pm

It was about time. When debating other guests, he is very disrespectful. I wonder what took CNN so long… He is not too smart. The network did the right thing thank God!
Brian R
February 23, 2012 at 5:27 pm

That’s lame that they sacked him for what could be, and seems to be, a misinterpretation by a few people. I agree that CNN should stand up for him.
Annemarie Diffenderffer
February 23, 2012 at 4:42 pm

What a load of crap… I for one, know Roland busts on soccer all of the time and I didn’t for a single millisecond believe his comments were in anything but fun. Shame on CNN for bowing down to the rantings of some idiot on Twitter. With all of the comments made on Twitter every second, any one of them could be twisted to mean something else…is this how people are going to seek revenge nowadays? “Hey, I don’t like John Doe, let’s print this out and tell the boss it was about him!” This could end the livelihoods of so many with the number of vindictive jerks in the workplace. I don’t like how CNN treated Roland. MAN UP. SUPPORT YOUR TEAM!
PEGGY WENDELKEN
February 8, 2012 at 10:08 pm

I think this whole thing is sad. I’m not sure what Roland meant, but I’ll take his explanation. It’s sad that this man might lose his career based on doubt.