Cheney Again Calls For Telecom Immunity

More BS from the BA

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

[ Life]

Let me preface by saying I think the current administration – from the top all the way down to appointees who blindly cooperate – should be tried for treason. That way we bring any allegations of bias or slant to the forefront and you know where I stand. No need to bring in theories about what lies beneath the words; the words are out in the open.

That doesn’t make me anti-Republican or anti-conservative. It makes me anti-this-administration, which has about 10 months left to screw with everything, and protesting against governmental abuses of power is the American way – not the liberal or conservative way.

So, what’s fired me up this morning is Vice President Cheney’s latest call to expand the government’s ability to spy on the American people whenever it wants for whatever reason without accountability, whether it is Constitutional or not, and his demand that the people be denied their right to even the pursuit of justice via lawsuits against the telecommunications industry for participating in illegal government activities.

Is there anything less ideologically American than the US government not only abusing its power to get around Constitutional authority but also denying the people their right to hold them (and co-abusers) accountable for it?  Wasn’t that the whole point of our break from Britain? The madness of King George, redux.

In a speech to the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank (take "think tank" with a grain of salt – it’s really about agenda-pushing, not thinking, like George Soros’ Center for Public Integrity – it’s all language designed to manipulate you), Cheney called for making permanent the Protect America Act, which is set to expire.

A law called the "Protect America Act" is more of that manipulative language, like calling a bill the "It’s Wrong to Kick Grandmothers Act." No politician in his right mind would vote against protecting America, only to have it lorded over him in the next election season. The Act expanded the executive branch’s ability to conduct warrantless surveillance and removes judicial oversight.

Remember all that talk, along time ago, about the balance of powers? The current administration isn’t too crazy about that provision.

Recently the administration has also pushed for surveillance of all traffic going across the telecommunications networks, not just those suspected of terrorism activities, which basically means everybody, Constitutionally protected or not. Nevertheless, in his speech Cheney still played the al Qaeda card:

"Second, the law should uphold an important principle: that those who assist the government in tracking terrorists should not be punished with lawsuits. We’re asking Congress to update FISA and especially to extend this protection to communications providers alleged to have given such assistance any time after September 11th, 2001. This is an important consideration, because some providers are facing dozens of lawsuits right now. Why? Because they are believed to have aided the U.S. government in the effort to intercept international communications of al Qaeda-related individuals."

So, not only is executive branch above the law, but the executive branch wants private companies to be above the law, too, so long as they’re helping the government break the law. I suppose if the government wants to hire a burglar to break into your house without a good a reason, both the government and the burglar should be immune to accountability, too, so long as they label it as an action against terrorism. But how long until they don’t need a convenient label either?

What’s worse, as Ryan Paul illustrates in his Ars Technica article, the Bush-appointed FCC won’t investigate, the buddy-buddy telecoms won’t disclose information to Congress citing it’s classified, and Bush’s Department of Justice is not cooperating with the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Freedom of Information Act request, also a violation of law from the administration.

This type of behavior and abuse of power on behalf of the government are exactly the types of things the framers of the Constitution were trying to prevent, and the Bush Administration has actively worked to operate outside those confines, breaking laws in order to further their agendas. And when the people try to hold them and those that aid and abet them in law-breaking accountable, they want to deny the right of the people to do that, too.

That’s a betrayal of the country. That’s working against the people and the Constitution. That’s treason in my book. I understand it will never happen, and fortunately, their days in government are numbered. What’s sadder, Congress is doing nothing about it – they have an election to think about right now – and neither are the Bush-appointed courts. Some balance of power we have. 

Cheney Again Calls For Telecom Immunity
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • Guest

    great. take a technology site and make it political! I think you are better suited writing about porn

  • Jason Lee Miller

    perhaps you’re right…but this does fall under the umbrella of technology, the politics of technology, or technology in politics, so we’ll say it’s under that umbrella, and we do branch out occasionally. We even have a “politics” tab…just let it have the usual disclaimer that the my opinions do not necessarily reflect those of the publication or its parent company


  • Guest

    Jason maybe my porn comment was a little hard hitting(although whenever I see a headline on this site that is related to sex, porn etc. I know that you are the author even before I click on it :) ) To your article, you should label it an editorial or something to call out the bias and opinion aspect versus fact based reporting.

    It is comical that you reference Soros. I mean really he is so deep into manipulating people and countries to line his own pockets and those of his billionaire friends it is not even funny. This is like the democratic playbook. Interesting to see how you feel 4 years into the next administration

    • Jason Lee Miller

      Interesting I’ve got that rep…probably b/c the other writers are too afraid to tackle the subject and, as sure as the sun rise, they leave them to me…oh well, I’ll take my lumps…writers always do, especially if they write about politics and sex

      I’m interested in how I’ll feel 4 years from now too…Give me a libertarian for president or give me…aw, shucks…

      • Guest

        Yep, you’re brave as hell to babble about sex and politics on a site called WebProNews.  And a true hero for insulting coworkers who don’t do the same.  Dumbass.

  • Jim C

    Calling out the current administration for its abuses and treason and doing so without the sort of anger and spit in the face rancor is a tough task.. Nicely done.

    What always (well maybe not always) amazes me is that instead of people stopping to reflect on the truth of the matter as you have called it out it serves as the proverbial waving a red flag in front of a bull and of course the correspondent pavlovian response is elicited.

    The nitwits respond with their usual ….

  • http://attackonamericain2001.com/webmy233.htm Guest

    "Let me preface by saying I think the current administration – from the top all the way down to appointees who blindly cooperate – should be tried for treason."

    Thank you Jason, I have been saying this for the last 7 years, but I want to include the entire Congress, and Senate for allowing the bastards so much control of our Country.

    I don’t just want them tried for Treason, but found guilty as they certainly are; and last I heard, Treason during time of war was punishable by death.  Face up to the gullotine blade so they can see the blade falling would be fitting punishment.

    "Give me a libertarian for president": I only wish that we had a libertarian candidate strong enoug to take the election away from the lying dweebs that are the current crop of crap we have to choose from.

    If our elected officials were chosen by the People rather than the news media we might get a fair shake. 

  • Photobug 48

    I agree that the Bush & Cheney administration is the most corrupt and criminal ever in our history.  And their use of language, as in the "Protect America" Act, is right out of George Orwell’s writings "Animal Farm" and "1984"- I think he called it "right speak" where his characters used words in opposition of their true meanings to hide what the characters were relly doing or saying.   I say  IMPEACH THEM ALL!!!

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter